• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Yet more evidence that commercial brewers do not mash at 5.2 to 5.6 pH ...

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Silver_Is_Money

Larry Sayre, Developer of 'Mash Made Easy'
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
6,462
Reaction score
2,226
Location
N/E Ohio
... but rather mash at 5.5 to 5.8 pH.

See page 416 at the link provided below to yet another peer reviewed commercial brewing research document. I quote the relevant section:
The first worts of oats and barley did not show significant differences regarding pH values. However, in pre-boiled worts the oat pH values again were slightly higher than the ones measured in barley. Nevertheless, both mash pH values lay within the pH range of 5.5–5.8, which is commonly observed in commercial brewing.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2011.tb00487.x
 
i didn't read the link but, i know when i get my mash ph to 5.3, tested at mash temp...i get a few points better efficiency...and i don't brew with oats?...
 
A room temp pH of ~5.5-5.8 is a mash temp pH of ~5.2-5.5.

As is usually the case in these mash pH debates, I'm guessing there's some apples/oranges comparisons being made....
 
5.2 to 5.5 mash pH as measured at mash temperature is fully apples to apples with 5.5 to 5.8 mash pH as measured at 20 degrees C. (68 degrees F.).
 
i didn't read the link but, i know when i get my mash ph to 5.3, tested at mash temp...i get a few points better efficiency...and i don't brew with oats?...

This would be commensurate with a pH measurement of ~5.6 at room temperature. And also within the range of 5.5 to 5.8.
 
Temperature isn't mentioned in your first post....

Yes, in retrospect the title of this thread should have more properly been "Yet more evidence that commercial brewers do not mash at 5.2 to 5.6 pH when measured at room temperature, but rather when measured at mash temperature".
 
5.2 is way too low and starts inhibiting alpha-amylase resulting in low attenuation values. No commercial operation would target such a low PH.
I guess the notion that 5.2 is OK came from the use of PH stabilizers (only used by homebrewers) that will stabilize mash PH at exactly that value.
 
5.2 is way too low and starts inhibiting alpha-amylase resulting in low attenuation values. No commercial operation would target such a low PH.
I guess the notion that 5.2 is OK came from the use of PH stabilizers (only used by homebrewers) that will stabilize mash PH at exactly that value.

The Alchemist Brewery reportedly targets a mash pH of 5.1-5.3 for Heady Topper....
 
Measurements are always performed at 20°C.

I've come to seriously doubt that home brewers mantra. And particularly more so as it relates to commercial brewing (unless the 5.2-5.5 at mash temp to 5.5-5.8 at room temp adjustment is applied).

I will however accept that post mash and pre-boil Wort pH is to be measured and adjusted at 20 degrees C., as there is an EBC standardized procedure which defines that measurement.
 
Last edited:
He actually told you that? In that case, did he mention at what temperature they measured?
 
In the expectation that it will come up at some juncture, ATC does not compensate for what is being discussed here. It would be more true to say that thanks to ATC a mash temperature pH of ~5.2 and a room temperature measurement of the very same sample at ~5.5 pH can both be assured to be correct.
 
Our club just brewed a collaboration Triple IPA at Red Tank Brewing in New Jersey and their head brewer definitely does target 5.0-5.5 ph range. I don't think it's a good idea to lump all brewers into a single category when it comes to their brewing process.

As far as I know ATC gives the most accurate results when both the calibration and mash pH reading are done at the same temperatures. Which is not the case in all instances, where the calibration is done at room temperature and the pH sampled at mash temperature.
 
Last edited:
Our club just brewed a collaboration Triple IPA at Red Tank Brewing in New Jersey and their head brewer definitely does target 5.0-5.5 ph range. I don't think it's a good idea to lump all brewers into a single category when it comes to their brewing process.
I totally agree. Brewers shouldn't automatically be lumped into the "professionally competent" category. :cool::p
Some commercial beers I've had the misfortune of tasting are strong proof to the contrary...
 
Our club just brewed a collaboration Triple IPA at Red Tank Brewing in New Jersey and their head brewer definitely does target 5.0-5.5 ph range. I don't think it's a good idea to lump all brewers into a single category when it comes to their brewing process.

As far as I know ATC gives the most accurate results when both the calibration and mash pH reading are done at the same temperatures. Which is not the case in all instances, where the calibration is done at room temperature and the pH sampled at mash temperature.

At this juncture we might want to consider that many small commercials were once home brewers, and also that many to most of them do not receive formal larger scale commercial brewery level training before or after making the transition. Thus their home brewing level training (be it ideal or less than ideal) makes the leap to small scale commercial. Commercials (larger scale at least) also more typically can be expected to adjust their Wort pH just prior to or perhaps part way into the boil step such that post boil and pre-fermentation pH comes in at between 5.0 and 5.2 pH as measured at 20 degrees C.
 
Last edited:
5.2 is way too low and starts inhibiting alpha-amylase resulting in low attenuation values. No commercial operation would target such a low PH.
I guess the notion that 5.2 is OK came from the use of PH stabilizers (only used by homebrewers) that will stabilize mash PH at exactly that value.

Or it came from some very knowledgable water experts Aj and Martin https://www.homebrewtalk.com/forum/threads/a-brewing-water-chemistry-primer.198460/

the problem with those pH stabilizers is that they can't possibly do the exact thing you just said: stabilize every mash at an exact value. Wort parameters vary from beer to beer in water buffering capacity, grain buffering capacity, etc so no single additive can possibly buffer all mashes at the same pH, nor is pH a stable value at any point and rises throughout the mash.

The commonly stated values of 5.2-5.4 (now revised to 5.1-5.5) should be as measured in a 68F sample, approximately 10 minutes into the mash for consistency.
 
Charles Bamforth had this to say about mash pH:
There have been surprisingly few (if any) detailed studies of the precise impact of pH on mashing performance and wort composition. Textbooks of brewing make reference to “optimum” pH’s for parameters such as extract and “wort filtration”, though they are conspicuous by the lack of references. One textbook refers to a previous textbook! It seems that a largely empirical approach has been employed. How the data has been generated and on what scale (lab mashes are not always good mimics of commercial mashes) is unclear.
Per Wikipedia: Charles W. Bamforth is the Immediate Past President of the Institute of Brewing and Distilling and Anheuser-Busch Endowed Professor of Malting and Brewing Sciences at University of California, Davis.

My take on this is that much of what we think we know as fact with regard to mash pH comes from nothing more substantial than circular reasoning as opposed to hard science. The home brewers mantra that beer should be mashed at 5.2 to 5.6 pH as measured at room temperature is as likely as not to have its origin in such circular reasoning.
 
Last edited:
5.2 is way too low and starts inhibiting alpha-amylase resulting in low attenuation values.

if it inhibits alpha-amylase, wouldn't that cause it to be more attenuatble? being that beta is what makes it more attenuable... or maybe i'm not understanding what you're saying?

Unless they were targeting 5.2 pH as measured at mash temperature.

everything i've read about mash ph says 'at mash temp'.....(not that it's that much, i just check it and go with what works)
 
Good article.

Couple points.

1. pH is clearly tested at 20C. Page 412, column 1 near the bottom: The pH values, colour, viscosity, TSN, FAN and β-glucan were analysed according to the EBC-methods 8.17, 8.5, 8.4, 8.9.1, 8.10 and 8.13.1. Here is a link to EBC 8.17 https://brewup.eu/ebc-analytica/wort/ph-of-wort/8.17

2. The article states "The first worts of oats and barley did not show significant differences regarding pH values. However, in pre-boiled worts the oat pH values again were slightly higher than the ones measured in barley. Nevertheless, both mash pH values lay within the pH range of 5.5–5.828, which is commonly observed in commercial brewing."

Pre boil wort - what is that? I assume this is kettle pH at the end of lautering before boiling. Again this would be a room temperature pH. This is not a 5, 15 or 30 minute pH. They only looked at 5 min on the barley mash and 15 min on the oat mash. The number silver focused on was preboil.
 
Head brewer of a brewery in the region told me they mash their Pils at 4.8 (not sure the temp that's read at). My jaw dropped. He said be was skeptical too, got the advice from some German brewers (don't know who), and it worked. I'm still not sure how much I believe it. It's a decent Pils though.
 
Charles Bamforth had this to say about mash pH:
Per Wikipedia: Charles W. Bamforth is the Immediate Past President of the Institute of Brewing and Distilling and Anheuser-Busch Endowed Professor of Malting and Brewing Sciences at University of California, Davis.

My take on this is that much of what we think we know as fact with regard to mash pH comes from nothing more substantial than circular reasoning as opposed to hard science. The home brewers mantra that beer should be mashed at 5.2 to 5.6 pH as measured at room temperature is as likely as not to have its origin in such circular reasoning.

https://sites.google.com/site/brunwater/water-knowledge

Martin cites:

Briggs, D.E., J.S. Hough, R. Stevens, and T.W. Young, Malting and Brewing Science, 2nd Ed. London, Chapman & Hall, 1981.

De Clerck, J., A Textbook of Brewing, Chapman & Hall, 1957.


Charlie also published this - which showed similar findings to Briggs, with some differences.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2552/99b3074831c08880ad72ccd67844d2d64adb.pdf
 
Back
Top