You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Jayf19
- Start date

- Joined
- Aug 24, 2010

- Messages
- 4,695

- Reaction score
- 4,120

#2

- Joined
- Jan 5, 2016

- Messages
- 36

- Reaction score
- 0

Thanks, I realized my picture was bad once it was too late!

- Joined
- Mar 10, 2021

- Messages
- 1,449

- Reaction score
- 1,034

1.058 will give you 6.30% ABV

1.060 will give you 6.56% ABV

And even if it's 1.062 then that will be 6.80% ABV.

Will it make any bigger difference for efficiency calculations to be more accurate with what you read?

Approximately1.05824863518983

More accurate measurements will allow more accurate calculations of efficiency. Due to the way measurement errors affect the accuracy of calculations, the least accurate measurement (error as a percentage of measured value) will have the largest effect on the error of you calculation. For example if your liquid volume measurements are +/- 4%, and all your other measurements (grain weight, grain potential, grain moisture content, SG, etc.) are all +/- 0.5%, your calculated efficiency will have an uncertainty of slightly more than +/- 4% of the calculated efficiency value. So, you want all of your measurements to be equally good. Making some extra good, doesn't help much.

1.058 will give you 6.30% ABV

1.060 will give you 6.56% ABV

And even if it's 1.062 then that will be 6.80% ABV.

Will it make any bigger difference for efficiency calculations to be more accurate with what you read?

Brew on

I don't measure.

It is what it is.

It will be beer.

It is what it is.

It will be beer.

I understand you're the official math and chemistry guru, but when figuring attenuation from OG and SG, no other measurements are used. It would be unaffected by volume - no?More accurate measurements will allow more accurate calculations of efficiency. Due to the way measurement errors affect the accuracy of calculations, the least accurate measurement (error as a percentage of measured value) will have the largest effect on the error of you calculation. For example if your liquid volume measurements are +/- 4%, and all your other measurements (grain weight, grain potential, grain moisture content, SG, etc.) are all +/- 0.5%, your calculated efficiency will have an uncertainty of slightly more than +/- 4% of the calculated efficiency value. So, you want all of your measurements to be equally good. Making some extra good, doesn't help much.

Brew on

Correct. I used volume in my previous post just for illustration. The math for determining the potential error is the same no matter which measurement you are looking at.I understand you're the official math and chemistry guru, but when figuring attenuation from OG and SG, no other measurements are used. It would be unaffected by volume - no?

When looking at ABV calculations, you need to realize that the formula used is just an approximation, so you will have calculation uncertainty due to the formula as well as the measurement uncertainty. I haven't looked into the ABV formula enough to know just what the potential errors are.

Brew on

- Joined
- Nov 24, 2017

- Messages
- 111

- Reaction score
- 56

Looks like 1.058 to me. I would even agree with the 1.0582.

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 745

- Replies
- 17

- Views
- 1K

- Participate in both public and private conversations with people that share your interest
- Start new threads
- See less ads

Enter your email address to join:

Thank
you! Please check your email inbox to continue.

There's already a member associated with this email
address.
Please log in or retrieve your
password.

Already
a member? Click here to log in
Register today and take advantage of membership benefits.

Enter your email address to join:

Thank you! Please check your email inbox to continue.

There's already a member associated with this email address. Please log in or retrieve your password.

Already a member? Click here to log in