Norselord
Well-Known Member
I want to test how different water profiles effect beers by doing two 1-gallon BIAB batches with the following recipe:
9.6 quarts of water (Atlanta profile from beer smith - very very very soft)
2lbs of pale 2-row (152F mash for 60minutes, 168F for 10minutes)
4oz caraamber
1oz corn sugar
1/8 oz galaxy @ 60mins
1/8 oz galaxy @ 5mins
1/4 oz galaxy @ flame out
Ferment at 67F with Pacific Ale (White Labs #WLP041)
The difference between the two batches will be the water chemistry
1st batch: 2.6g gypsum, 1.5g table salt, 0.3g calcium chloride, 0.8g chalk
2nd batch: 1.0g gypsum, 1.2g salt, 0.9g calcium chloride, 0.9g chalk
The question i have is this:
Since i have 1 gallon of boil-off per hour, and i will start with 2.4gallons and end up with a 1.4gallon post boil volume. The math says that the concentration of ions will be doubled by the time yeast is added.
Should i try to achieve a target profile concentration that is post-boil, pre-boil, or mash? Another way of asking this question, is when do the various ions effect beer? Do they facilitate the enzymatic breakdown and work mostly during the mash? Do they effect the biology of the yeast by providing a certain nutrient balance? Do they directly effect the taste and mouthfeel of the beer?
Palmer is not very clear on how the ions work. For example, the only real notes i get on sulfate is that higher levels produce a cleaner and accentuated hop bitterness, that at levels over 400ppm a beer becomes astringent, and that at levels over 750ppm it can cause diarrhea.
I know that in larger batches the minerals do not get as concentrated (a 1 gallon boil-off in an 11-gallon boil is not going to impact mineral content as much)
Just imagine if you are trying to brew an authentic IPA using an initial water profile matching Burton-on-Trent (725ppm SO4) in your mash volume of 2.4gallons and at the end of the boil you get 1.4gallons will have increased the sulfate content to 1240ppmv...
9.6 quarts of water (Atlanta profile from beer smith - very very very soft)
2lbs of pale 2-row (152F mash for 60minutes, 168F for 10minutes)
4oz caraamber
1oz corn sugar
1/8 oz galaxy @ 60mins
1/8 oz galaxy @ 5mins
1/4 oz galaxy @ flame out
Ferment at 67F with Pacific Ale (White Labs #WLP041)
The difference between the two batches will be the water chemistry
1st batch: 2.6g gypsum, 1.5g table salt, 0.3g calcium chloride, 0.8g chalk
2nd batch: 1.0g gypsum, 1.2g salt, 0.9g calcium chloride, 0.9g chalk
The question i have is this:
Since i have 1 gallon of boil-off per hour, and i will start with 2.4gallons and end up with a 1.4gallon post boil volume. The math says that the concentration of ions will be doubled by the time yeast is added.
Should i try to achieve a target profile concentration that is post-boil, pre-boil, or mash? Another way of asking this question, is when do the various ions effect beer? Do they facilitate the enzymatic breakdown and work mostly during the mash? Do they effect the biology of the yeast by providing a certain nutrient balance? Do they directly effect the taste and mouthfeel of the beer?
Palmer is not very clear on how the ions work. For example, the only real notes i get on sulfate is that higher levels produce a cleaner and accentuated hop bitterness, that at levels over 400ppm a beer becomes astringent, and that at levels over 750ppm it can cause diarrhea.
I know that in larger batches the minerals do not get as concentrated (a 1 gallon boil-off in an 11-gallon boil is not going to impact mineral content as much)
Just imagine if you are trying to brew an authentic IPA using an initial water profile matching Burton-on-Trent (725ppm SO4) in your mash volume of 2.4gallons and at the end of the boil you get 1.4gallons will have increased the sulfate content to 1240ppmv...