Reno_eNVy
Well-Known Member
Anyone ever told you you look like someone?
Tim Howard?
Nah, nah, you know who you look like? The goalkeeper for Everton.
Anyone ever told you you look like someone?
Speaking of Tim Howard, he is taking a 1 year hiatus from US Soccer. Thankfully he's not retiring yet. Hopefully he'll be around for the next World Cup.
Tim Howard?
Nah, nah, you know who you look like? The goalkeeper for Everton.
I'm not going to panic.... I'm not going to panic. He's probably just bogged down and wants to focus on the club side. There are capable backups.Brad Guzan is just as good but Timmy get's the start because he is only that hair-widths better. I'mtotallynotworriedthathewilldecidedtoretireafterthatyear. DO I LOOK LIKE I'M PANICKING?!
I think it should be stressed that Timmy was given the blessing to do this by Klinsmann. This isn't like Landon's sabbatical. Given Klinsmann's eye to the future I expect him to use a lot of keepers and in a way he probably considers this a blessing as now Guzan gets to be tested under the fire of the Gold Cup.
Somehow, I think Klinsmann won't be as negative about Howard's sabbatical than he was about Landy's
Sent from my iPad using Home Brew
Jones, as a designated player of a certain threshold, was not subject to allocation ranking for dispersal to an MLS team. The Revolution and Fire expressed an interest in Jones, and had the available salary budget and a designated player slot to accommodate him. Following a blind draw between the two clubs, Jones was assigned to the Revolution.
Soooo Jermaine Jones is going to New England. And for some reason the allocation order means dick for him, even though the policy has been Yanks joining the league have to go through the order. MLS be MLSin'
From the article:
See this is part of my frustration with MLS.
Apparently the fire lodged initial interest and were working on getting him over. Jones preferred Chicago. MLS get involved and have to run his name through the league. Revolution are interested and tick the requisite boxes. MLS tell Jones they can't guarantee a destination if multiple teams are interested. Jones balks because he wants to go to Chicago. MLS ups the ante and guarantees his salary at either destination provided he drops the demand to go to Chicago. Jones does and Revolution win the draw...
So the Fire wanted Jones and Jones wanted the Fire but because it's MLS he ends up in New England. Can anyone explain this to me?
MLS be MLSin'
See:
- Donovan to LA (though I'm not complaining about that)
- The sudden shift to Yanks having to go through allocation order
- "Discovery Rights"
- The sudden shift to some Yanks having to go through allocation order
- "If you're going to join the league as an expansion team you must have a comprehensive stadium plan in place.... except you, NYCFC."
- etc.
- etc.
- etc.
- et al
Don't get me wrong, I love the league and sometimes I don't care that they fudge the rules (i.e. as stated above Landy to LA, as well as the DP rule) if it results in a better on-field product.
First off, so I don't hurt feelings, I enjoy watching some MLS games.
But I often feel like the policies of MLS are similar to playing soccer with my 3 year old son. Everyone gets a turn to score a goal, and if someone is having trouble scoring a goal, the goalie has to move out of the way.
Yea, I like the league to, but involving an envelope draw in determining where a player lands doesn't project the greatest image of MLS.
First off, so I don't hurt feelings, I enjoy watching some MLS games.
But I often feel like the policies of MLS are similar to playing soccer with my 3 year old son. Everyone gets a turn to score a goal, and if someone is having trouble scoring a goal, the goalie has to move out of the way.
I think we're seeing policies still in place to protect teams and a league just trying to get on its feet that aren't necessarily needed anymore. The everyone gets a turn thing helps at the beginning to spread the wealth so you don't end up with some power teams while others whither and die on the vine.
I think the push for parity is still a necessity. At the very least, until we hit 24 teams and (likely) stay at that number for a while.
But changing USMNT allocation rules isn't a way to do it, IMMHO.
I think the push for parity is still a necessity. At the very least, until we hit 24 teams and (likely) stay at that number for a while.
But changing USMNT allocation rules isn't a way to do it, IMMHO.