Sparging

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

jikastew

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Location
Omaha
Batch Sparger here:

1. Easier to make
2. Cheaper to make
3. Efficiency acceptable at 80%
4. Easier to brew
 

davesrose

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
967
Reaction score
11
Location
Atlanta, GA
Fly sparge here. I find it easy, and with step mashes I'm averaging close to 90%.
 

bradsul

Flyfisherman/brewer
Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Sep 12, 2006
Messages
4,889
Reaction score
42
Location
Ontario, Canada
Do you have that on speed-reply? :D

I do both batch and fly sparging (mostly depends on the weather). I get usually about 89% efficiency with my fly sparging rig and ~85% batch sparging. If I was all about the numbers I'd fly sparge all the way, but I only like to do that when it's nice outside and I can sit around in the sun drinking some beers.
 

Bytor1100

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2008
Messages
544
Reaction score
3
Location
Utah
All I have done currently has been batch sparging. Due to lack of fly sparge setup, ease, and 80% efficiency with batch. Don't see a real reason to switch.
 

menschmaschine

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
3,259
Reaction score
51
Location
Delaware
I fly. Always have for no real reason (initially) except that with my 3-tier keggle set-up, I thought it would be easier because the only thing I need to keep an eye on volume-wise is my boil volume. For sparge water, I can just fill up the HLT, heat it up to ~170 and sparge until I hit boil volume. This, coupled with the fact that I get 92% efficiency, will keep me fly-sparging. As for a complicated set-up, I don't think mine could be much easier. All I do is sprinkle the water coming out of the tubing from the HLT. Yes, it's labor-intensive, so to speak, when I could be doing other things for 45 minutes instead of sprinkling a hose of 170 degree water, but I don't think it's a big deal. I enjoy brewing and taking my time with it for now. But a sparge-arm contraption is on my mind.
 

missing link

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
650
Reaction score
4
Location
Highland, MI
I fly sparge because that was how I set my equipment up. I have a $5 PVC manifold in the bottom of the MLT and I have a $5 manifold that sits on top of the grain.

As a previous poster said, I over add water to my HLT by a gallon or so and then just watch my pre-boil target volume and stop when I get there. Last 2 brews have been right around 90%. Though I am more happy about 2 batches having similar efficiency than I am about the actual efficiency. I'm brewing tomorrow and I have adjusted my recipe for 85% this time.

I've never batch sparged, I suppose I should try but there just aren't as many gadgets involved!!!
 

Alemental

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2007
Messages
122
Reaction score
1
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
I fly sparge, or, more correctly, I do the hybrid fly sparge discussed in BYO a bit back. (Adding 1/3 of my sparge water at a time, & draining it off at normal sparge rates) I recirculate during the mash, and I can maintain the clarity achieved this way. It takes longer, but is actually less work. I seem to enjoy it more as well.
 

FSR402

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Supporter
Joined
May 30, 2007
Messages
2,808
Reaction score
30
Location
Jenison, MI
I have only batch sparged. Mainly due to no fly setup and it's fast and easy to do.
But I am thinking of building a fly mainifold this weekend just so I can do it if I feel like it. Maybe on a day when I have a lot of extra time and some friends over to brew. It will give more time to relax and have a brew.
 

Hopgarden

New Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I fly sparge. The sparge arm I cobbled together at Lowe's from a large shower head, the type that mimics rainfall, and a barb fitting for the hose to attach. I just clamp it on my cooler MLT and adjust the flow rate. Cost less than $20 and it's easy.
 
Top