Hi, I am planning to brew my first higher gravity, hoppy beer.
Would you give me feedback on the grain bill and check out my questions around yeast selection?
OG 1.067
74% Light Maris Otter (1.5L)
8.5% Munich (15L)
5% Wheat malt
5% Carapils (2L)
1.3% Crystal (90L)
6.2% Dextrose
Planned mash temperature is 148F (64.5) for at least 60 min.
I initially planned to ferment using WLP002 however, when I punched the numbers in the Brewersfiend calculator, FG was predicted 1.020.
If instead I select WLP007, FG is predicted at 1.015. I do not know how accurate the prediction is, but I am now worried about my initial yeast selection.
I want the beer to finish on the dry side and still preserve a good deal of malt backbone. I don't know what FG I should be looking for given the OG of this beer.
For comparison:
I fermented a 1.046 beer down to 1.010 using WLP007 and I liked it, full of flavour (78% attenuation)
I fermented a 1.050 beer down to 1.007 using US-05 and I also liked it, it was very drinkable although a slightly on the thin side (85% attenuation)
I have not used WLP002 before.
thanks,
p_p
Would you give me feedback on the grain bill and check out my questions around yeast selection?
OG 1.067
74% Light Maris Otter (1.5L)
8.5% Munich (15L)
5% Wheat malt
5% Carapils (2L)
1.3% Crystal (90L)
6.2% Dextrose
Planned mash temperature is 148F (64.5) for at least 60 min.
I initially planned to ferment using WLP002 however, when I punched the numbers in the Brewersfiend calculator, FG was predicted 1.020.
If instead I select WLP007, FG is predicted at 1.015. I do not know how accurate the prediction is, but I am now worried about my initial yeast selection.
I want the beer to finish on the dry side and still preserve a good deal of malt backbone. I don't know what FG I should be looking for given the OG of this beer.
For comparison:
I fermented a 1.046 beer down to 1.010 using WLP007 and I liked it, full of flavour (78% attenuation)
I fermented a 1.050 beer down to 1.007 using US-05 and I also liked it, it was very drinkable although a slightly on the thin side (85% attenuation)
I have not used WLP002 before.
thanks,
p_p