This is because at the lower pH the (PO4)-3 ions convert to H(PO4)-2, and H2(PO4)- ions.Palmers book = Brewing Elements Water. I was surprised to learn that the more acid added, the less calcium precipitates.
Below is the example for 100 ppm.
Forgot this one is on my web site.The charts come in increments of 50 ppm. Hope you don't mind I posted it AJ, found it in a google image search...click to enlarge:
That doesn't seem right. The chart says that to acidify to pH 5.5 for most reasonable starting water pH's (down to 6.5) you should be able to have up to 600-700 ppm Ca++.I stopped using Phosphoric for this reason. I was having to use more than was needed (for last runnings pH control) in the sparge water, just to keep the calcium I wanted....With Phosphoric, the safe zone to keep the calcium was under 10 ppm which I think was overkill with respect to final runnings pH control.
Yes, for the most part but it is something brewers should be aware of. For example, taking water with alkalinity 100 and acidifying it to pH 6 for sparging will result in a threshold calcium level of 25 mg/L. If the water contains more than that there will be precipitation. The obvious fix is to continue to acidify until pH reaches 5.75 where the calcium threshold is 50 mg/L or 5.5 where it is 160. Adding the additional acid should re-dissolve the precipitate but it may take some time for the system to come to equilibrium.Calcium precipitation via phosphoric acid addition is a red herring.
That doesn't seem right. The chart says that to acidify to pH 5.5 for most reasonable starting water pH's (down to 6.5) you should be able to have up to 600-700 ppm Ca++.
The second time I used Pauls Mild Ale Malt and missed mash pH high at 5.47 (typical for this malt I've found) so I added 1 mL Phosphoric which brought it down to 5.38 (5.40 target). Assuming the water had 39.6 ppm Alkalinity and pH of 8.00 and with the goal of keeping 135 ppm Calcium in the sparge water, I added 0.18 mL 85% Phosphoric per gallon to target 5.65 pH.
Sounds reasonable.After sparging, wort pH rose to 5.41.
Sounds reasonable too. And I don't think you would reach calcium/phosphate saturation at those levels. Even if you did the precipitation of some apatite shouldn't result in harshness.I've been targeting a pre-boil pH of less than 5.40 so I added 0.34 mL Phosphoric which resulted in a pre-boil of 5.38.
This beer had a very harsh astringent bitterness. I added a bit more hops to the whirlpool compared to last time but I can't believe that harshness came just from the hops. Other hoppy beers have turned out harsh and coincidentally, I used phosphoric acid in them too.
Calcium concentration has to be somewhat high in order for phosphoric acid to have any effect on precipitating that calcium. Therefore, there is plenty of calcium left over for precipitating oxalate. Don't worry about using phosphoric acid.
!00 ppm Ca should not be a problem. There are some curves in the back of Palmer's book. Remember that at mash pH there is much less phosphate (PO4-3) than there is at nominal pH (7) so that any "calcium phosphate" that did precipitate can redissolve.
There is one reason to use lactic and that is that you may like the flavors it imparts. This would especially be the case where the lactic is added by means of sauermalz.
Enter your email address to join: