johnsnownw
Well-Known Member
How long has it been fermenting, and at what temp?
Also, this yeast is known to fast ferment and to quickly drop krausen.
Also, this yeast is known to fast ferment and to quickly drop krausen.
johnsnownw said:How long has it been fermenting, and at what temp?
Also, this yeast is known to fast ferment and to quickly drop krausen.
View attachment 139720
Got it in secondary right meow
johnsnownw said:Why did you decide to put it in secondary early, and when you had fermenting concerns?
It was done with active fermentation so I racked it over.
johnsnownw said:In the future I would recommend not doing that. The yeast clean up after themselves, which can take care of any off-flavors that may have been created during primary. This is especially a concern if you don't have a ferm chamber, as during active fermentation the wort temperature can raise as much as 8-10° warmer than ambient.
Just a suggestion though.
Not exactly sure if I understand. If there was no yeast activity why would I want to keep it in the primary?
johnsnownw said:There is yeast "activity" all the time...even if that isn't reflected in your samples. Also, at 1.030 the yeast were most likely still eating sugar, albeit slower than I would expect. Pitching another vial into primary, if the yeast were indeed going dormant for whatever reason, would have quickened the process of fermenting, and clean-up.
You do not want to bottle that beer anywhere near 1.030.
I'm sure it will be fine, but most brewers would leave the beer in primary for at least 2 weeks, regardless of the gravity readings.
I used to rack to secondary after a week or after the krausen fell, as well, but my beer has improved quite a bit since leaving it for at least 2 weeks in primary.
Here's a good read, note that the 1st commenter is wrong:
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f163/primary-only-vs-secondary-effect-yeast-clean-up-396266/
Well it was in there for 10 days. Maybe I should've been more patient. I checked the gravity and it had dropped to 1.022. So we shall see how it turns out
johnsnownw said:It will turn out just fine, and unless you did a side-by-side comparison to one that you let sit a little longer...you probably wouldn't be able to tell a difference.
I was just giving suggestions for future brews.
What did you decide to use for your vanilla addition?
I used 5 vanilla beans soaked in JD for a couple days. The vanilla beans came from a Mexican company called Orlando. My family has always used their extract so I assumed there beans will be great quality.
Guidry said:I've used both and in my opinion the Madagascar have a much better flavor! If you can get good quality Madagascar beans, spend an extra couple bucks and get 'em.
Where do you get the Madagascar?
Guidry said:12-16 beans? How many gallons? Holy crap! Cant imagine that much vanilla.... 3 was plenty in 5 gallons.
johnsnownw said:In the future I would recommend not doing that. The yeast clean up after themselves, which can take care of any off-flavors that may have been created during primary. This is especially a concern if you don't have a ferm chamber, as during active fermentation the wort temperature can raise as much as 8-10° warmer than ambient.
Just a suggestion though.
The last time I cracked one open, 4 weeks ago, the vanilla flavor was quite a bit stronger. This would have been at approx. 5 months since bottling.
After bottle conditioning for 5 weeks, it has spent the rest of the time in the fridge.
Maybe that's my problem -- I can't make a batch last five months!