melanoiden malt vs. munich malt

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

justclancy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
45
Reaction score
1
Location
Bologna
I was wondering about the differences between Munich malt and Melanoiden malt. I can only get munich malt in 5 kg increments, but can get melanoiden malt in 1 kg increments. For upcoming recipes I will only need a small amount of these types of grains, so I would like to get the melanoiden.
My problem is that I have never used melanoiden malt, so I would like to know how it is similar to, and different from, munich malt. I have used munich malt in high percentages, up to 50% of the grain bill, and have liked the results. To get a similar type of effect from melanoiden malt as I get from munich malt would I have to use significantly less melanoiden malt?
For example, if I had a recipe that was 80% pils and 20% munich, could I substitute the melanoiden for the munich, use 90% pils and 10% mel, and get a similar tasting beer?
Any thoughts on these two malts?

Edit: the lighter, about 8L munich, not the darker 20L munich.
 
Weyermann recommends use of Melanoiden up to 20% of total grist. From experiance I have learned to use 10% for a nice malty profile that you can balance with finishing hops. If I want a very malty style with less or little hop finish I will go to the 20%. I started using 5% and was disapointed with the malt profile. All that said it is going to be determined by your taste.
 
Interesting. So would you say that Munich and Melanoiden give the beer a similar flavor, and a similar type of body, but that you need less of the Melanoiden than you would Munich?
 
IMO there's a flavor difference between the two. I might replace some of the Munich with melanoidin, but definitely not all of it.
 
Whatever it is in Melanoidin (it may actually be called Melanoidin) that gives it the very malty flavor is also present in large amounts in Munich and in Vienna. The first difference is that it is in higher concentration in Melanoidin than in the others. Melanoidin was developed (by Weyermann I think?) as a specialty grain to add the malty taste without having to use larger ammounts of other malty base malts, Munich and Vienna in particular. Both of the others can be used as a base malt and are often used as a specialty.
That all being said Munich and Melanoidin are not the same. Munich has other flavors and even other malting temps (Munich I and Munich II) that add other flavors.
As far as mouth feel, they are not malted to enhance mouth feel. That can be enhanced with mashing technique and with the addition of a half to 1 lb of Cara-Pils
 
I believe Melanoidon malt is most similar to Aromatic malt, and then Biscuit malt. I find Munich to be much richer and melanoidin to be more "neutral" flavored, but adding nice body
 
Melanoiden can give a very slight "fruit" character. I believe I was Denny who posted that somewhere, and it perfectly described a lager I had just done. It was a good, subtle flavor, not "fruity", just a weird kind of sweetness.
 
As it has been explained to me, melanoidins, formed as a result of the Maillard reaction (think bread crust), are best extracted from malt especially kilned malts (Vienna, Munich, victory, biscuit) by decoction mashing. Double and triple decoctions assumably achieve even better results in big well-rounded bready malt flavors. However, since homebrewers may not want to add 2-3 hours of extra brew time, you have melanoidin malt produced commercially as a substitute. However, there's never been a perfect substitute for hard work and extra waiting in brewing. Especially German brewing. :D

Someone please correct me if any of this is erroneous.

Cheers

Peter
 

Latest posts

Back
Top