By all means, try it if you want to... However...
Most people don't understand FWH'ing. It has very little to do with reducing bitterness or adding flavor. It was developed by German brewers as a way to increase bittering utilization. When analyzed in a lab beers that that were FWH'd contained higher IBUs and lower concentrations of flavoring/aromatic compounds than control beers with a traditional bittering addition.
The acrid harshness that some American IPAs can possess is due to a poor understanding of brewing IPAs and the fault of the brewer. The FWH technique is not required to correct it. Rather, revisiting the recipe, the ingredients used, and the procedure as a whole will likely result in harmonizing the quality of the beer.
Smooth bitterness in an IPA can be achieved by using less of a bittering charge and implementing a 90 minute boil whereupon the first charge is added at the 75 or 60 minute mark, or after the floc is formed.
The polyphenols in hops are actually the harsh bitter culprits. They are very eagerly attracted to the non-coagulated protein which is present in the kettle during early boil. Once the hops are bound up with formed proteins, there is much less surface area exposed. These tannins/polyphenols are then mostly eliminated in the hot break. For this reason, many pro brewers add the bittering addition 15-30 minutes after the boil begins or after floc is formed. This produces a smoother bitterness without destroying the desirable hop bite in an American IPA, which is by design, an unbalanced beer style. There is nothing balanced about an American IPA. They are inherently bitter. Yes, that bitterness can be tamed a bit. But by definition, American IPAs are not supposed to be 50/50 on the sweet/bitter spectrum, or even close to that ratio.