Early Review: Jasper Yeast JYO-37 ESB, the Fullers Strain/WY1968/Imperial Pub

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Bramling Cross

Supporting Member
HBT Supporter
Joined
Apr 5, 2020
Messages
1,583
Reaction score
8,555
Location
The 51st State
Before anything else, I should make it clear that I am a US brewer that hasn't had a pint in the UK in over twenty-five years. Take everything that I write about UK ales with a substantial pinch of salt. I'm a US-based admirer of UK ales, not a UK brewer. I'm hardly an expert.

I recently started using Jasper Yeast's version of the Fullers strain and, although I only have two pitches under my belt, I'm excited enough about my results that I wanted to post my results as early as possible. We're all familiar with WY1968/Pub: it makes unambiguously UK-esters, is easy to work with, and it floccs like a lead ball. It's the UK's version of the Chico strain or 34/70, it wants to make excellent beer and you have to screw up spectacularly to keep it from doing so.

Nevertheless, WY1968 and Pub have a reputation for pulling up a bit short in the attenuation department, especially when you compare it to the wild attenuation rates described by Ron Pattinson's amazing blog. I certainly recall reading a few frustrated posts about this in the past and I've absolutely experienced it myself. Pub will eke out a few more points than WY1968, but both of them punk out around 75% on their best days.

Enter Jasper Yeast. As mentioned above, I only have two pitches under my belt and only one keg in my fridge with this strain, but it's already clear that Jasper's take on the Fullers strain is a more aggressive attenuator. On the first and second generation pitches (an ordinary bitter and a dark mild) Jasper's JYO-37 has hit 79% attenuation. Wow!

Jasper's take on the strain delivers the esters and, like '68 and Pub, it makes an unambiguously UK ale that has those big, fruity esters. Jasper's esters are just a bit more restrained, maybe because the greater attenuation cuts into the sweetness that helps define the concept of "fruity?" That greater attenuation also allows your water adjustments to cut through a bit more cleanly, which is really nice and might also contribute to the slightly restrained esters.

You don't get all that for free: Jasper's take on Fullers is fractionally slower to hit TG compared to '68 or Pub--but that's still blazing fast. Both my pitches hit TG in four days. It's also more reluctant to flocc, but that makes sense given its higher attenuation rate. More bothersome, it seems to hang around much more persistently in the serving keg than '68 or Pub. Nah, it's not chill haze: you can taste the yeast in the ale. On the plus side, it's a very pleasant yeast taste, nothing bitter or bite-y. It plays nicely with the hops, malt, and water salts. I'm a stickler for clear beer, but my tongue does not object to its presence.

Going forward, I'm really eager to put this strain to work on some UK IPAs. The Thames Valley strains have never impressed me, but I think the Jasper strain might get the job done in spades. Its propensity to clear the way for your water salts makes that a no-brainer. I also think this will excel in stouts and porters where it's drier finish will highlight the dark grains and clear a lane for them to play a bigger role in the ale's finish.

I'm very excited about this strain and, like all Jasper strains, it's a bargain. Their pitches are packaged for 10gal batches and they cost the same as Imperial or Omega. RIP White Labs and Wyeast.

Here are the fermentation curves for the first two pitches:

Ordinary Bitter that is kegged an pleasant.
Bods.png



Dark Mild, crashed today no flavor impressions yet.
Mild.png
 
Last edited:
If the beer comes out cloudy and tasting of yeast maybe you should use finings like gelatine.
I like my bitters as clear as possible. Using Pub A09 and gelatine does just that. And I don't really care for that little more attenuation. I like to keep some of the sweetness in there in my ales.
 
I’m glad to see some feedback on another Jasper strain. I’ve only heard good things from others and had good experiences myself with their products. Just ordered their Munich lager strain for a string of lagers.

When I hook the beer engine back up I’ll have to consider using a Jasper English strain!
 
If the beer comes out cloudy and tasting of yeast maybe you should use finings like gelatine.
I like my bitters as clear as possible. Using Pub A09 and gelatine does just that. And I don't really care for that little more attenuation. I like to keep some of the sweetness in there in my ales.
Like you, I like my UK ales brilliantly clear. What I'm talking about is a slight haze, and a complementary yeast flavor. Each of the ales I've produced with this strain have been crashed and fined. The Jasper strain floccs quickly, but it leaves a slight haze for a week or two. Kinda like the Chico strain: there's Chico clear, then there's (wait for it) Chico brilliant. Does that make sense?

With three pitches under my belt, more on that in a subsequent post, I agree with you regarding keeping some body and sweetness in lower gravity UK ales. With this in mind, going forward I intend to use Pub for sub-1.045 ales and Jasper for anything bigger. I'm also tempted to try blending the strains, but I've done that before and I'm not all that interested in trying to maintain mixed strains again.
 
Here's the third pitch on this strain. Again, really wild attenuation for a UK strain. This batch was a UK pale ale with no funny stuff. It's just Otter, 10% homemade invert #1, and EKGs. This was mashed at 148F (64.5C) for 60min, then underlet to 158F (70C). I was going for maximum fermentability because it suited the style and it was a great opportunity to see what this yeast is capable of producing.

Jasper III.png


That's pretty wild attenuation for a UK-sourced strain. In fact, I was very concerned that it might be infected, but I pulled a sample yesterday and it's clear as a bell. I'm eager to get this kegged this week.

So, here's what I've learned about this strain so far: 1) It's a UK strain that tastes like a UK strain but isn't afraid of attenuating. 2) Like Chico, it has a primary flocculation which results in a clear but slightly hazy ale, followed by a secondary flocculation after 1-2 weeks in the keg resulting in brilliant ale. 3) If you're going to make a mild with this strain, it pays to mash high. This strain's attenuation will suck the body out of a mild. 4) It doesn't throw esters quite as exuberantly as Pub/'68, but it's unambiguously a UK strain on the tongue. 5) Apart from being a better alternative to the Thames Valley strain, my experience with the mild ale has me thinking that this might be an exceptional dry Irish stout strain.

I'll mention more when I learn more, but it'll be a while. I'm out of Otter and the LHBS won't have any available for several weeks.
 
View attachment 858996

That's pretty wild attenuation for a UK-sourced strain. In fact, I was very concerned that it might be infected, but I pulled a sample yesterday and it's clear as a bell. I'm eager to get this kegged this week.
What - 1.047 to 1.007? Not really - and that's before we get onto some of the Northern yeasts like Boddies....

People have this idea that British yeasts have low attenuation when it's just not true. Some individual strains isolated from UK multistrains may have low attenuation, but that's seldom true of the multistrain as a whole. In particular, any brewery sending beer for export to places like India needed all the fermentable sugars to be fermented out before the beer went to the tropics, as otherwise you're setting up not bottle bombs, but barrel bombs...

And you need the dryness to keep the drinkability, which keeps people coming back to the bar. Sugar sates them.
 
What - 1.047 to 1.007? Not really - and that's before we get onto some of the Northern yeasts like Boddies....

People have this idea that British yeasts have low attenuation when it's just not true. Some individual strains isolated from UK multistrains may have low attenuation, but that's seldom true of the multistrain as a whole. In particular, any brewery sending beer for export to places like India needed all the fermentable sugars to be fermented out before the beer went to the tropics, as otherwise you're setting up not bottle bombs, but barrel bombs...

And you need the dryness to keep the drinkability, which keeps people coming back to the bar. Sugar sates them.

Perhaps I didn't make it clear enough in my prior posts, but the aspect of this yeast that is interesting and prompted me to start this post was its much higher attenuation rate than Pub/1968. For those of us in the States that follow the work of Ron Pattinson and other writers that have documented the very high degree of attenuation in UK ales, Pub/'68's low attenuation has been a source of frustration. For those of us in the States, the Jasper strain opens the door for more, as the Belgians like to say, "digestible," UK ales at higher gravity.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top