... Appreciate your constructive input ...
And I for one appreciate you digging up the subject!
Three weeks on, and I'm still busy grinding the subjects discussed here into my "water treatment" mechanisms. For too long I've forgotten about these "add 'hardness' minerals to kettle" options (did I ever have an opinion?). Instead, I'm on the same "water treatment travelator" as everyone else (it seems), weighing out salts to ludicrous accuracy to attain concentrations to fractions of a part-per-million ... and I'm still getting mash pHs of less than pH5.0!
Your post has triggered a long overdue reset of how I go about water treatment.
Out (of the mash) is going treatment salts. They'll just go in the sparge water ... or the kettle! I "full-boil-length" mash when using AIO systems ... no sparge water to add treatment salts to. Except for alkalinity salts in the mash which regulate the mash pH, and a minimal addition of calcium salt to get the mash water up to about 30parts-per-million Calcium (I have water with a very low TDS): Using your "only about 40% of the mash calcium carries over to the kettle" (50ppm seems to be the minimum accepted
total concentration, hence "30ppm" above), which I whinged about 'cos it wasn't quantitative remark (i.e. 40% of what), but 40% might well refer to a representative amount, and any "error" will be so small as nothing to give a fig about.
With the remaining salts going to the sparge water or direct to the kettle, measuring them to "ludicrous accuracy" becomes ... ludicrous? ±0.1g should be close enough, or nearest ½g, or even nearest whole gram. Heck, why not use a teaspoon! Alkalinity salts will still need more careful weighing depending on the pH accuracy trying to attain for the mash, be it pH5.2-5.6 will be close enough or a more specific mash pH is sought. With low Calcium (and Magnesium) the amount of alkalinity salt should fall dramatically (not depending on it to counter the acidity sparked of by those salts)?
A knock on might be mash water quantity. Fixed quantities should allow more accurate prediction of mash pH. And pH is considered as having most impact over efficiency than water/grain ratio? Not really an argument for me, I've already stated: I Full-boil-length mash (i.e. no sparge) which should indicate what I think of regarding "water/grain ratio".
Fixed mash water quantities? And ... Other than alkalinity the other water salts (added to the boiler) can be worked out in respect of the
batch size*. It had always bothered me that I was weighing out salts to two decimal places, then boiled the wort, concentrating those salt to an undetermined quantity. Strange behaviour.
Well, if any of this is dodgy, I'll be shouted down soon enough.
(Can I hear people shouting me down already? ... And I haven't posted it yet!).
* Batch Size plus unrecoverable boiler losses, including hop absorption, if trying to be spot on. Same with mash water; if "no-sparge" any additions it contributes shouldn't include any mashtun losses, including grain absorption.