kwiley
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2020
- Messages
- 32
- Reaction score
- 5
This fall is my first season making cider -- and my first season making any kind of alcohol. I've never brewed of fermented or distilled anything before. My main motivation is that I have a large apple tree that I can't keep up with via baking and or freezing to bake over the year. So I tried cider this year. I've made three batches so far and apples for a fourth batch are currently "mushing" in the freezer. I'll press (I have a 20-ton hydraulic press, so that's a lot of fun) and ferment them later this week.
My first and second batches, yielding two gallons each and pitched with S-04 and L. Nottingham, have been fermenting very slowly. My basement has been running about 64F, dipping to 62F as the fall sets in (although it rose to nearly 70F for a day or two when I ran heaters to dry up a huge cider spill, described below). I add sugar to my cider as the pasteurization is cooling down, so it would make sense that fermentation will take a while, but it isn't just goin a long way: it's going slowly. The airlocks were bubbling 2-3 times per minute at their peak and are slower than that now. The first batch started at 1.107 and after 30 days is down to 1.056. A linear projection would take 9 weeks to reach 1.0. The second batch started at 1.073 and after 20 days is down to 1.040, which will take a little over 6 weeks to reach 1.0. These seem very slow to me.
My third batch began as 5.5 gallons distributed between a 3-gal carboy and 3 1-gal jugs. This batch had Cotes de Blancs and included yeast nutrient and pectic enzyme. Days two and three showed practically no activity, not only from the airlock but in terms of "fizz" rising through the brew to the surface. It seemed utterly unstarted in all four containers. I attempted to stir up the jugs to reaerate them and kick the yeast into action, and in the process shattered the 3-gal, spilling 2.5 gallons of fresh cider across my basement floor. I saved half a gallon in the large basting tray the carboy was sitting in and distributed it to the remaining 1 gal jugs, particularly to the last jug which had only been half full to start with. The brew was still essentially dead the next day so I pitched Cider House Select. That had a remarkable effect. By the next day all three jugs were fermenting madly, with the airlocks bubbling every few seconds and the "fizz" visibly aggressive relative to the first two batches in their respective four jugs, still slowly simmering away.
Three days later, tonight, this third batch is utterly done. Two jugs were essentially dead this morning, one was dramatically slower. By this evening the third jug was dead too. I tested them and they came out to .996 +/- .001 per jug. So they simply blew the first two batches away, which are still sitting there very very slowly descending, almost stalled in my opinion (a 9 week projection seems insane to me; should it take that long?). I'm worried the first two batches are sitting on the lees so long that they will accumulate off-flavors before the fermentation runs its course, and yet they aren't truly stalled. They are very slowly proceeding, so I'm not sure what to do with them.
Tonight, I added 1/2 tsp nutrient to one jug of each of the first two batches as an experiment. I will explicitly not do that to the other jug of each of those first two batches, and I am curious to see how the two jugs of each batch differ as a result. As to the third batch, clearly, it is extremely done at this point and I'm wondering what to do with it next, which brings me to the subject line of this post. All three jugs smell horribly of sulfur (curiously, one is worse than the other two). This is the first time I have encountered this, as all four jugs of the first two batches have smelled rather pleasant each time I have tested them over the past month. I am rather disappointed that this third batch fermented so vigorously but has now resulted in an insufferable sulfurous aroma. I don't want to mess with copper, so I'm tempted to let it age to see if the sulfur resolves itself with time. But I have some questions as to how to do this properly. Should I age it in the primary fermentation or should I rack it? I have read that the lees actually absorbs the sulfur, but I thought most of the sulfur elimination came from degassing, so I'm not sure if leaving it in the primary is good, bad, or inconsequential. I have three jugs from this batch, so I could experiment, leaving some in the primary on the lees and racking some to a fresh jug. But I'm curious what others think is the best approach. I'm also unsure whether the aerate it. Some reading suggests I should intentionally slosh it as I rack it to help push the sulfur out of the solution, but of course the main wisdom concerning secondary and long-term aging is to avoid oxidation (and headspace in general), so those two lines of advice are contrary to one another. What do you think?
Lastly, as I said, I will start a fourth batch very soon and I would like it to go well if at all possible. Right now, it almost seems like adding yeast nutrient and achieving a fast fermentation, although very pleasing during the process, may have caused this situation. Should I not add any nutrient? The first two batches are barely alive, so I thought the lack of nutrient in the first two batches might be their problem, but now I'm worried that using nutrient to propel the fermentation causes more trouble than it's worth. I'm not sure what to do now.
Any thoughts on this are much appreciated. There are several issues swirling here. What should I do about my first two batches that seem confounded to finish at all? Should I be worried that their long-term primary lees will ruin them before they finish fermenting? How should I save the third batch with its strong sulfurous odor? What should I do as I go into the fourth batch? Any other general advice around this whole topic?
Thanks!
My first and second batches, yielding two gallons each and pitched with S-04 and L. Nottingham, have been fermenting very slowly. My basement has been running about 64F, dipping to 62F as the fall sets in (although it rose to nearly 70F for a day or two when I ran heaters to dry up a huge cider spill, described below). I add sugar to my cider as the pasteurization is cooling down, so it would make sense that fermentation will take a while, but it isn't just goin a long way: it's going slowly. The airlocks were bubbling 2-3 times per minute at their peak and are slower than that now. The first batch started at 1.107 and after 30 days is down to 1.056. A linear projection would take 9 weeks to reach 1.0. The second batch started at 1.073 and after 20 days is down to 1.040, which will take a little over 6 weeks to reach 1.0. These seem very slow to me.
My third batch began as 5.5 gallons distributed between a 3-gal carboy and 3 1-gal jugs. This batch had Cotes de Blancs and included yeast nutrient and pectic enzyme. Days two and three showed practically no activity, not only from the airlock but in terms of "fizz" rising through the brew to the surface. It seemed utterly unstarted in all four containers. I attempted to stir up the jugs to reaerate them and kick the yeast into action, and in the process shattered the 3-gal, spilling 2.5 gallons of fresh cider across my basement floor. I saved half a gallon in the large basting tray the carboy was sitting in and distributed it to the remaining 1 gal jugs, particularly to the last jug which had only been half full to start with. The brew was still essentially dead the next day so I pitched Cider House Select. That had a remarkable effect. By the next day all three jugs were fermenting madly, with the airlocks bubbling every few seconds and the "fizz" visibly aggressive relative to the first two batches in their respective four jugs, still slowly simmering away.
Three days later, tonight, this third batch is utterly done. Two jugs were essentially dead this morning, one was dramatically slower. By this evening the third jug was dead too. I tested them and they came out to .996 +/- .001 per jug. So they simply blew the first two batches away, which are still sitting there very very slowly descending, almost stalled in my opinion (a 9 week projection seems insane to me; should it take that long?). I'm worried the first two batches are sitting on the lees so long that they will accumulate off-flavors before the fermentation runs its course, and yet they aren't truly stalled. They are very slowly proceeding, so I'm not sure what to do with them.
Tonight, I added 1/2 tsp nutrient to one jug of each of the first two batches as an experiment. I will explicitly not do that to the other jug of each of those first two batches, and I am curious to see how the two jugs of each batch differ as a result. As to the third batch, clearly, it is extremely done at this point and I'm wondering what to do with it next, which brings me to the subject line of this post. All three jugs smell horribly of sulfur (curiously, one is worse than the other two). This is the first time I have encountered this, as all four jugs of the first two batches have smelled rather pleasant each time I have tested them over the past month. I am rather disappointed that this third batch fermented so vigorously but has now resulted in an insufferable sulfurous aroma. I don't want to mess with copper, so I'm tempted to let it age to see if the sulfur resolves itself with time. But I have some questions as to how to do this properly. Should I age it in the primary fermentation or should I rack it? I have read that the lees actually absorbs the sulfur, but I thought most of the sulfur elimination came from degassing, so I'm not sure if leaving it in the primary is good, bad, or inconsequential. I have three jugs from this batch, so I could experiment, leaving some in the primary on the lees and racking some to a fresh jug. But I'm curious what others think is the best approach. I'm also unsure whether the aerate it. Some reading suggests I should intentionally slosh it as I rack it to help push the sulfur out of the solution, but of course the main wisdom concerning secondary and long-term aging is to avoid oxidation (and headspace in general), so those two lines of advice are contrary to one another. What do you think?
Lastly, as I said, I will start a fourth batch very soon and I would like it to go well if at all possible. Right now, it almost seems like adding yeast nutrient and achieving a fast fermentation, although very pleasing during the process, may have caused this situation. Should I not add any nutrient? The first two batches are barely alive, so I thought the lack of nutrient in the first two batches might be their problem, but now I'm worried that using nutrient to propel the fermentation causes more trouble than it's worth. I'm not sure what to do now.
Any thoughts on this are much appreciated. There are several issues swirling here. What should I do about my first two batches that seem confounded to finish at all? Should I be worried that their long-term primary lees will ruin them before they finish fermenting? How should I save the third batch with its strong sulfurous odor? What should I do as I go into the fourth batch? Any other general advice around this whole topic?
Thanks!