I just got back the results from a Belgian Tripel entered into a competition. I'm not complaining about the score(30.5), I know it wasn't perfect. My main issue is with some of the comments. Both score sheets mentioned a lack of alcohol taste. One judge even checked the Solvent box on the left side and wrote "missing" next to it. Looking at the BJCP guidelines, "High alcohol content adds a pleasant creaminess but little to no obvious warming sensation." Is this indicative of a blind spot in the judging process? One of the great things about drinking this style, IMO, is knowing the ABV and appreciating the sneakiness.
One even went so far as to tell me the beer was under attenuated. If the judge doesn't have access to the specs of the beer, why is he commenting on this. By the way, the O.G. was 1.077 and F.G. was 1.004. Beersmith comes up with Apparent Attenuation of 94.4%. So I'm sure that is not a problem here.
I would love to hear any comments, particularly from certified judges with some experience.
Thanks in advance!
One even went so far as to tell me the beer was under attenuated. If the judge doesn't have access to the specs of the beer, why is he commenting on this. By the way, the O.G. was 1.077 and F.G. was 1.004. Beersmith comes up with Apparent Attenuation of 94.4%. So I'm sure that is not a problem here.
I would love to hear any comments, particularly from certified judges with some experience.
Thanks in advance!