Search results

I probably shouldn't have said worry free. Part of what makes if fun is the challenge to improve the quality of the beer and the process of making it. I got a 20 gallon Blichmann G2 kettle for Christmas. It would be easy and less money to get the Blichmann Breweasy over the Colorado Nano...

I'm ready to order this system but I'm reading a lot of issues going on. My whole intent was to make things worry free.

The re-circulation tube mounts to the basket via a removable bracket fitting. The same bracket simply mounts to the kettle for whirlpool. Tim at Colorado Brewing was very helpful and quick to respond. I can't see any reason to go with the Nano Pro-Down Under for my needs as a home brewer.

Looks like the pro version kettle has an extra port on the side near the bottom dedicated to just whirl pooling. I assume on the home version you just remove the metal tube that is attached to the basket for mash whirlpool and remove the basket. Then reattach the same tube to the kettle somehow...

Thanks for the reply. Have you been able to do five gallon batches? I will mostly do 10 gallon batches but the ability to do the occasional five gallon batch would be great. I'm trying to understand what I gain from spending more on the Pro Down Under. Im ready to order; just a little uncertain...

Those of you that have ordered and are using this system: it's hard to find a lot of information out there on this system. The more I think about what I really want, this system seems to fit the bill.. I want a system that allows me to still be a part of the brew day but offers fewer cleanable...