What's the thickest mash you ever did? | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

What's the thickest mash you ever did?

Discussion in 'All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing' started by Silver_Is_Money, Jan 19, 2017.

 

  1. #1
    Silver_Is_Money

    Larry Sayre, Developer of 'Mash Made Easy'

    Posted Jan 19, 2017
    And how did things turn out? Did brewhouse efficiency suffer? Was it manageable? Would you do it again?
     
  2. #2
    GilaMinumBeer

    Half-fast Prattlarian  

    Posted Jan 19, 2017
    So thick it collapsed a domed false bottom.

    Horrible, Yes, No, No.
     
  3. #3
    Silver_Is_Money

    Larry Sayre, Developer of 'Mash Made Easy'

    Posted Jan 19, 2017
    Wow, was it less than 1 qt. of water per pound of grain?
     
  4. #4
    friarsmith

    Well-Known Member  

    Posted Jan 19, 2017
    1 quart water per lb of grain for a barleywine that was close to maxing out my mash tun. I looked back at my recipe and I got 70% efficiency with a batch sparge, so I guess you could say it went ok.
     
    dmtaylor likes this.
  5. #5
    shelly_belly

    Someday After A While

    Posted Jan 19, 2017
    I made Edwort's Robust porter in a 5gal mash tun and could only add enough water to get to .98qts/lb. I broke my hydrometer so I didn't get the original gravity. Beer was great though.

    DSC00288.JPG
     
  6. #6
    dmtaylor

    Lord Idiot the Lazy  

    Posted Jan 20, 2017
    0.8 qt/lb. Turned out great. Efficiency was great because I did a double sparge. The thickness isn't bad, the grains are still all moist enough. Yep, I'd do it again. It's a great technique for huge beers where you want to sparge a lot to improve efficiency and boil a longer time, maybe 2-3 hours. Using this method I can brew an all-grain 1.115 beer. I've done this more than once.
     
  7. #7
    RoadKing

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jan 23, 2017
    We have a 55 gallon drum set up and made a big beer in Saturday.
    136 lbs of grain into 39 gallons of water, which is under 1.2 qts per lb. but
    there's 3.5 gallons under false bottom which made the mash thickness 1.08 per lb. Big sparge and long boil, ended up with 32 gallons at 1.115
    72% efficiency compared to the normal 82% but thats just 'cause it was such a big beer.
     
    Twotaureanbrewing and dmtaylor like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder