Should I expect a low FG if I had a low OG? | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

Should I expect a low FG if I had a low OG?

Discussion in 'Beginners Beer Brewing Forum' started by NicePelos, Apr 21, 2009.

 

  1. #1
    NicePelos

    Member

    Posted Apr 21, 2009
    I brewed a Tripel last week that had a low OG (1.079 actual vs 1.085 expected). Should I expect the FG to be lower than the expected 1.018? The fermentation seems to have stopped at 1.020. Any thoughts? Should I feed the yeast to get it going again? The recipe calls for racking to the secondary after 7 days and letting it sit for 5 weeks until the FG is reached. I may be wrong, but I thought very little if any fermentation occurred in the secondary?
     
  2. #2
    Edcculus

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Apr 21, 2009
    You won't necessarily get a more fermentable wort (lower FG) with a higher OG. How long has it been in the primary? 1.020 is the typical "curse" of homebrewing. Rousing the fermenter and warming it a bit may help get those last few points.

    As for a secondary, you are right. A lot of older recipes will give you this time table. For a beer this big, you will gain a lot from letting it sit in the primary for 3-4 weeks. It might not hurt a tripel to rack to a secondary (really clearing tank) for a few more weeks of bulk aging.
     
  3. #3
    JesseRC

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Apr 21, 2009
    I'd shake it an leave on primary for 3-4weeks. I've also heard you can bring the temps up a bit right after most of the peak fermentation has occurred.
     
  4. #4
    NicePelos

    Member

    Posted Apr 21, 2009
    Thanks! It's only been in the primary for a week which is when the recipe recommended it should be racked to the secondary. I'll give it a shake and leave it for a couple weeks.
     
  5. #5
    WBC

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Apr 22, 2009
    My rule is 2 weeks minimum in the primary. Most of the time I never use a secondary fermenter. Never use secondary's for ales.
     
  6. #6
    944play

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Apr 22, 2009
    +1 to the above. My 1.082 Delirium Tremens clone dropped 10 points (to 1.010) in the second week in the primary. Don't rack yet!
     
  7. #7
    AnOldUR

    fer-men-TAY-shuhn  

    Posted Apr 22, 2009
    A secondary is good if you are dry hopping or doing other fermenter additions and want to harvest the yeast from the primary without a lot of crap in it. Even so, I'd leave it in the primary for at least a couple of weeks before transfering.
     
  8. #8
    CourtHouseBrewing

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Feb 18, 2012
    After reading all the posts about how people leave the wort to ferment in the Primary for up to 4 weeks!
    I now own three 6 gal carboys as Primaries, I modified a fridge with digital temp controller for lagers to ferment and another fridge dedicated to cooling the bottled beer for consumption, and for some reason SWMBO puts oranges in it! Doesn’t she get it… it’s for beer. And still I need more of everything because I like to brew every weekend. Oh yea, and I took over one room in the house for my fermentation and storage room. I guess I’ll deal with the oranges.
    :tank:
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder