Pitch more yeast? | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

Pitch more yeast?

Discussion in 'Fermentation & Yeast' started by trekie86, Oct 3, 2013.

 

  1. #1
    trekie86

    Active Member

    Posted Oct 3, 2013
    I started my first batch last week, 9/28, and got the beer into the fermenting bucket and put on the sterilized lid and the bubbler. I'd say less than 12 hours later, I was bubbling like crazy. I'd say it only did that for 36 to 48 hours and then doesn't seem to have bubbled since.

    Do I need to pitch more yeast or give it a swirl to re-suspend the yeast?

    My recipe was the True Brew Amber kit.

    3.3 lbs Muntons LME Hopped Amber
    2 lbs Muntons DME Light
    1 oz Cascade Hop Pellets AA: 7.3%
    1 packet (6 grams) Muntons Active Brewing Yeast

    I re-hydrated the yeast at 38 degrees C and let it re-hydrate for about 30 minutes with a stir in the middle. I had a good froth on the yeast before pitching. I pitched the yeast into my Wort at 22 degrees C, gave it a quick stir with my sterilized spoon and put it in the basement to do its thing. The thermometer on the outside of the bucket has stayed about 68-72 degrees Fahrenheit.

    Just another piece of info, not sure if its necessary but the O.G. was 1.043

    I'd appreciate any advice for this newbie. If I need to pitch more yeast I'll stop at the brew shop on my way home from work tomorrow.
     
  2. #2
    NewWestBrewer

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 3, 2013
    You should be fine...let it sit another 2-3 days then take a gravity sample to see where its at. Your brew is not a big one so 2-3 days of ferment is pretty common.
     
  3. #3
    trekie86

    Active Member

    Posted Oct 3, 2013
    Thanks for the response. I sure hope that is the case. I did pull the bubbler just to give it a sniff and it smelled like beer, so that's a good sign. I only plan on doing a primary fermentation but was planning on letting this brew sit in the fermenter for 2 weeks, so a little more than a week still to go. In my reading, it seems that this will help further condition the beer, before it gets in the bottle, and let the "stuff" settle to clarify the beer. Do you think that will be a problem?

    Again, thanks for the response.
     
  4. #4
    NewWestBrewer

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 3, 2013
    That is a good plan...most people will even leave it in primary for 3 weeks then bottle. The only way to tell is to take reading 2-3 days apart and if they are the same it is good to go.
     
  5. #5
    BigFloyd

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 3, 2013
    It's not unusual to have a lower gravity brew finish with visibly active fermentation within the first few days (depending on yeast, temp, etc.)

    Do not pitch more yeast (unless you desire yeasty beer). Give it another week, take a hydro reading and see where you're at on this. It will probably be finished.
     
  6. #6
    trekie86

    Active Member

    Posted Oct 12, 2013
    So its been just shy of two weeks and I took a gravity reading. The beer smells like beer, looks like beer, and tastes like fairly good flat beer. However, the specific gravity was 1.020. The kit estimated that the FG should be around 1.010. So my ABV is only 3.02% That seems really low.

    My initial assessment is that my yeast stalled out and didn't ferment completely. I'm going to bottle tomorrow because I haven't seen a bubble in over a week. So to learn from my mistakes and not screw up again, did I have too little yeast? Temperature issues? Something else? It's a bummer I have at least two weeks before I can try my beer, so I hope it turns out well.
     
  7. #7
    midfielder5

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 12, 2013
    the yeast packet, at 6 grams, is a pretty small one. But you did rehydrate it, so that is good
    Other producers give you 11 grams or so. I have never used Munton's because it has (i heard) a bad rap. I am sure some people like it just fine.

    Next time choose yeast made by Safale Fermentis, Danstar or another, more expensive, dry yeast. US 05 is a good clean ale strain. there are about 3 to 5 other manufacturers. good luck.
     
  8. #8
    BigFloyd

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 12, 2013
    This ^^^^^^^^^.

    Also, you're certainly not the first extract brewer to have a batch stop at 1.020 and refuse to go lower. If it's the same gravity in a few days, bottle, wait three weeks and fridge for three days or more before sampling. Don't worry about the ABV so long as it tastes good.:D
     
  9. #9
    IslandLizard

    Progressive Brewing Staff Member  

    Posted Oct 12, 2013
    Coming from 1.043, that beer will be quite sweet though. I would let it sit in a warmish place, 70-75°F for a day, give it a good stir and see if it resumes. If it's still at 1.020 after another week, then bottle.

    I've had quite a few extracts stop at 1.020-1.022 but they were all coming from 1.064-1.072 OG, which is relatively more sensible. Even after 4 weeks conditioning they stayed put. Yeah, they were a bit sweet, but the balance was very acceptable there.

    Something about extract, next time you brew. Only add about 1/3 at the beginning of the boil and the balance, 2/3 at flameout. It makes better beer. And make sure the LME is well dissolved and doesn't stick to the bottom.

    +1 on the 11g yeast pouches. US-05 is marvelous.
     
  10. #10
    trekie86

    Active Member

    Posted Oct 14, 2013
    Thanks for all of the responses. I ended up bottling this weekend anyway, when I measured again on Saturday morning there was no change so I'm assuming its done. When I took my sample for the hydrometer reading, it smelled good, looked good, and tasted good, all be it flat. I'm hoping it wasn't a total bust.

    It wasn't until doing some more reading that the 6 gram bag seemed small. Everything I've read thus far has been about 11 grams. My next batch I think I'll use a Wyeast "Slap" Pack or a White Labs liquid, I've heard good things about both of them.

    Thanks again for all of the responses and I'll let you know how it tastes in 2-3 weeks.
     
  11. #11
    BigFloyd

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 14, 2013
    Until you're ready, willing and able to make a yeast starter plus thoroughly aerate the wort, I'd suggest using an 11g packet of dry yeast like US-05, S-04, Nottingham, BRY-97, etc. You'll get a much better cell count and have a higher probability of a successful fermentation.
     
    midfielder5 likes this.
  12. #12
    IslandLizard

    Progressive Brewing Staff Member  

    Posted Oct 14, 2013
    +100 on that ^.

    One vial or smack pack would be equivalent at best to your 6 grams envelope of dry yeast, giving you similar under pitching problems. And keep in mind, the viability of the liquid yeast is never 100% unless it was produced the day before you buy it. So you must make starters or spend a small fortune on multiple vials or smack packs.
     
  13. #13
    trekie86

    Active Member

    Posted Oct 14, 2013
    The recipe I was looking at highly recommended a starter yeast. What do you all recommend as the sugar for starting the yeast? I've seen a pound of DME as a typical yeast starter sugar. Is that a good choice? If that is the choice, what type? Just a light or should it match to what type of beer i'm brewing?

    If I were to re-do the same amber beer, would it be best to just get a quality 11 gram packet and re-hydrate that before pitching or make a starter? I'm surprised the kit came with such a small packet but I guess that's what you get for a "cheap" all extract kit.
     
  14. #14
    JuanMoore

    Supporting Member  

    Posted Oct 14, 2013
    You want to use light or extra light DME for your starter, and a pound should make a whole lot of starters. You essentially want to make a low gravity wort for the yeast to grow and multiply in. Here's a decent place to start regarding how to make a starter-

    http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f39/how-make-yeast-starter-pictorial-updated-340261/

    Here's a handy calculator that can help determine the size of the starter you need to make based on the size of the batch, the OG, whether you're using a starter or not, and the date the yeast was made-

    http://yeastcalc.com/

    A properly rehydrated 11g packet of dry yeast isn't any better or worse than a liquid yeast with a properly made starter. There is a wider variety of yeast strains in liquid form, since many strains can't handle the drying process. I use about equal amounts of dry yeast and liquid yeasts personally. For an amber ale I'd likely use Safale S-04, which is a dry yeast, but that's just personal preference.
     
  15. #15
    BigFloyd

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 14, 2013
    What variety of brew are we talking about?

    Plenty of beers will turn out delicious using dry yeast. Much more important than dry vs. liquid is chilling the wort (into the 60's for ales) before pitching, pitching the right amount of viable yeast cells, and closely controlling the fermentation temp.

    With the 11g packet, rehydrate (preferred) or sprinkle dry. Don't bother making a starter with dry yeast. That's a waste of time and effort.
     
  16. #16
    trekie86

    Active Member

    Posted Oct 15, 2013
  17. #17
    brew_ny

    Social_Misfit  

    Posted Oct 15, 2013
    alls you need to do is rehydrate the dry yeast

    S_M
     
  18. #18
    trekie86

    Active Member

    Posted Oct 15, 2013
    Well, that is what i did for the last batch so I'll just make sure I get a quality dry yeast to rehydrate.
     
  19. #19
    midfielder5

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 15, 2013
    The rehydration step is also a viability check. If the yeast does not cream/foam up within 15-30 min, it may be DOA.
    Dry yeast are created(?) a certain way such that they only need rehydration-- adding wort/sugar for a starter actually delays their ability to ferment the beer.
    Lastly, dry yeast packets have waaay more yeast cells than liquid vials/smack packs, so there is no need to make a starter for normal OG & 5 gallon batches. It may be necessary for some beers to pitch two packets.
     
  20. #20
    midfielder5

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 15, 2013
  21. #21
    BigFloyd

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 15, 2013
    That kit will be just fine with S-04 so long as you control the ferment temp. It will do a great job if you start it at 63-64*F, keep it there the first 4-5 days and then let it come up to finish at 68*F. Caution - If you ferment with S-04 in the 70's, it will kick off plenty of esters and maybe some other undesirable flavors.

    The reason that you rehydrate dry yeast instead of doing a starter with it has to do with the need to reconstitute their cell walls (which happens best in 95-105*F tap water) before pitching them into wort.
     
  22. #22
    JuanMoore

    Supporting Member  

    Posted Oct 15, 2013
    An 11.5g packet of dry yeast has ~200b viable cells in it, which is plenty to give a decent pitching rate for 5gal of all but the highest gravity beers. The cell viability stays very high for a very long time, even when not stored under optimal conditions. It is possible to get a packet of dry yeast that's mostly dead, but it's highly unlikely, and you'd notice it during rehydration when nothing happens and it smells bad.

    Liquid yeast on the other hand starts out with ~100b cells, and viability decreases rapidly, especially if it's not stored properly. You can use MrMalty or yeastcalc to estimate how many viable cells are left in your liquid yeast based on the production date, but it's usually going to be significantly less than the 100b cells it started out with. The low cell count is the main reason a starter is recommended for liquid yeast.

    You certainly can make a starter with rehydrated dry yeast, but it's typically not necessary unless you're fermenting large batches or something with a super high gravity. And since dry yeast is typically quite a bit cheaper than liquid, many people opt to simply use a second packet of dry yeast rather than making a starter with one packet.
     
  23. #23
    BigFloyd

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 15, 2013
    +1. Technically, you can make a starter using dry yeast, but you ought to fully rehydrate it first, then pitch into the starter wort. I don't know anyone who does this for the reason pointed out by JuanMoore. One 11g packet of rehydrated dry ale yeast is plenty for a 5-gallon batch up to 1.060.
     
  24. #24
    JuanMoore

    Supporting Member  

    Posted Oct 15, 2013
    Back when dry yeast cost ~$2/packet I wouldn't have ever thought about making a starter rather than just buying 2-3 packets. Now the LHBS wants $4-8/packet for dry yeasts, and since I brew 10-12 gal batches of primarily higher gravity beers, I've been considering making starters even when using dry yeast.
     
  25. #25
    brew_ny

    Social_Misfit  

    Posted Oct 15, 2013
    I have been washing and making starters with Nottingham, US - 05 and S-04

    I could not be happier with reusing my yeast

    all the best

    S_M
     
  26. #26
    trekie86

    Active Member

    Posted Oct 17, 2013
    When I re-hydrated my yeast, I did get a good foam so that makes me feel good. So I guess I'm not sure if the size of the yeast packet or the fermentation temp were my culprit.

    I've read good things about the S04 so I'm hoping it works well. I'm quite excited about my next brew and I haven't even tasted my first brew yet.
     
  27. #27
    BigFloyd

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 17, 2013
    S-04, Nottingham and US-05 have become my go-to dry yeasts for brews that don't need a style-specific liquid yeast. You can (and will) make some excellent beers using them. I've got two batches (a coffee porter and a graff cider) fermenting right now both with S-04.
     
  28. #28
    trekie86

    Active Member

    Posted Oct 17, 2013
    Great to hear. Thanks
     
  29. #29
    giorgio-alemani

    Active Member

    Posted Oct 21, 2013
    Thanks for this!
     
  30. #30
    trekie86

    Active Member

    Posted Oct 27, 2013
    Well the verdict is in and it tastes great! I was expecting it to be very sweet but in fact it wasn't too sweet at all. It had a nice bitterness and good mouth feel. Can't wait for my next batch.

    ForumRunner_20131026_211606.jpg
     
  31. #31
    brew_ny

    Social_Misfit  

    Posted Oct 27, 2013
    thanks for the update

    it does look great enjoy :)

    all the best in your next brew

    S_M

    ForumRunner_20131026_211606.jpg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder