New wort cooler questions | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

New wort cooler questions

Discussion in 'Equipment/Sanitation' started by Squidmanoo7, Dec 18, 2015.

 

  1. #1
    Squidmanoo7

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 18, 2015
    I had a 10' 3/8 coil of copper seemed like it took my new ran hour to cook I recently bought 25' of half inch I was just wandering if it would cool quicker and how long is to long to chill the wort
     
  2. #2
    Squidmanoo7

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 18, 2015
    Wow must be drunk lol the 3/8 seemed like it had to run for an hour +
     
  3. #3
    Jwin

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 18, 2015
    So I think I read your question correctly
    And the answer is, it depends.
    Chilling water temp, design, stirring, wort volume, etc all play into it. But, will be much faster, so RDWHAHB
     
  4. #4
    Squidmanoo7

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 18, 2015
    Haha thanks :mug:
     
  5. #5
    Squidmanoo7

    Well-Known Member

  6. #6
    jake-k

    want another? Yip  

    Posted Dec 18, 2015
    I don't think there is to long. People on here leave it overnight before they pitch yeast. I personally like it to cool rather quickly. I made a 25' 3/8" chiller that cools down to 70 in about twenty minutes, so I think 1/2" would be even faster than that.
     
  7. #7
    Squidmanoo7

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 18, 2015
    Something along the lines of it....I'm going to take it to work n fab it up so the lid will shut properly with it in there
     
  8. #8
    Squidmanoo7

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 18, 2015

    Is faster better?
     
  9. #9
    jake-k

    want another? Yip  

    Posted Dec 18, 2015
    IMO it is. Less time exposed to air.
     
  10. #10
    Squidmanoo7

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 18, 2015
    Thanks jake-k I kinda thought that myself
     
    jake-k likes this.
  11. #11
    ryan810cows

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 24, 2015
    Keep in mind is all about surface area. I have a 25' X 3/8" CFC and I can cool down to 60-65 deg. F in 20 or so min with 60 deg. F water.

    For my CFC, the wort is able to dissipate the heat real easy b/c of the 3/4" hose I have around it. The cooling hose has a much higher thermal mass than the small 3/8" wort line slowing more of the wort to cool quickly.

    But for an Emission, I think your going good with the 1/2" tube. The "cooling" water will be in the tube and it will be able to carry more heat, hight thermal mass the a 3/8", due to the extra volume of water in the 1/2.

    To make it even better, you could add more tubing and make an additional coil in the center. But that may be a bit Over Engineered!

    Wow.. Ok.. That was a bit long winded... LOOKS GOOD THOUGH!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder