I am impressed with White Labs | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

I am impressed with White Labs

Discussion in 'General Homebrew Discussion' started by sonofgrok, Oct 12, 2012.

 

  1. #1
    sonofgrok

    n00basaurus  

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    To date, I have always used dry yeast (with no problems) but I made a beer yesterday using WLP001 liquid yeast from White labs. For my dry yeasts, I usually soak them for 20 minutes or do up a little starter but with the vial of WLP001, I just shook it up and pitched it. Took a skeptical look at it this morning and it is bubbling like a whore in church. I am surprised it hasn't blow the airlock off with how its going. Must admit that I am somewhat impressed.
     
    somedudefromguam likes this.
  2. #2
    0verdrive

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    I think you and I have different expectations of what whores do in church... :cross:
     
  3. #3
    Xpertskir

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
  4. #4
    TopherM

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    It is going nuts because it is designed as a high-temp yeast strain, not because it's liquid yeast or of some certain quality point. In fact, it looks like you didn't make a starter with the liquid yeast, so you likely underpitched, and this may not turn out quite as good as if you had used the equivilant chino dry yeast. That liquid vial has about 30 billion viable cells, while a 11.5 gram packet of something like Safale S-05 has 60 billion.

    These days, dry yeast is every bit as high quality as liquid yeast, and dry is actually typically a better option for brewers that don't make proper starters.
     
  5. #5
    sonofgrok

    n00basaurus  

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    All very interesting information. I still like dry yeast since I mostly make mead (EC1118 is my favorite). This liquid yeast was suggested as I am making an Amber Ale while waiting for some meads and braggots to age. I didn't think it would need a starter. I guess we will see how it works out!,
     
  6. #6
    biochemedic

    Well-Known Member  

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    +1, despite the quick start, you are getting a markedly different pitch rate using a vial of 001 vs an 11.5 gm packet of US-05...

    ...But in general, I've also been impressed with White Labs, but more related to their responsiveness to questions, etc. I haven't tried them, but they also now offer a number of new lab services that have previously been relatively unavailable to homebrewers, if you're into that sort of thing...
     
  7. #7
    Homercidal

    Licensed Sensual Massage Therapist.  

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    WL website state that each vial contains 75-150 billion cells. The count and viability is directly related to the age and conditions the vial has experienced of course.

    I've had good luck just pitching the vial in a smaller gravity beer, but the difference since I started making starters was amazing. They are so easy since I started canning my own starter wort and using a stirplate.
     
    moviebrain likes this.
  8. #8
    sonofgrok

    n00basaurus  

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    The "good by" date on the vial was feb 2013 which they claim is exactly 4 months out from bottling so it had to be brand new and it was refrigerated at the brew store so I am guessing it was in good shape.
     
  9. #9
    Molybedenum

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    I'm pretty sure your numbers are supposed to be 5 times these - 150 for liquid (optimum) and 300 for dry.
     
  10. #10
    Homercidal

    Licensed Sensual Massage Therapist.  

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    EDIT: My bad posted bad math.

    Danstar says 5x10 (to the power of 9) for each gram, so 50 Billion cells times 11 grams = 550 Billion cells.

    Fermentis says 6x10 (to the power of 9) for each gram so 60 Billion cells times 11.5 grams = 690 Billion cells.
     
  11. #11
    aubiecat

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    Me too. :mug:
     
  12. #12
    Golddiggie

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    While Mr. Malty is a good site, yeastcalc.com is far better IME/IMO. For one thing, yeastcalc will figure out up to three starter steps for you. So, you can make smaller starters, over more time, to get the cell count you need. Use a stirplate and you can make even smaller starters (compared with not using a stirplate). I have a two step starter planned for next weekend's brew day (the 20th) and then a three step for the following weekend brew day (a BIG barely wine). Using this method I'll get the cell count needed and use less DME in the process.
     
  13. #13
    aubiecat

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    I love yeastcalc.com. I use it exclusively for the reasons mentioned by Golddiggie.
     
  14. #14
    iYeast

    Member

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    Viability is very important but you can't forget vitality. If the cells are in poor health their cell walls will be like Swiss cheese. This will prohibit them from controlling the chemicals they produce during fermentation and also reabsorbing them during the rest phase.
     
  15. #15
    Golddiggie

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Oct 12, 2012
    Thing is, the selection/variety of dry yeast doesn't even come close to the liquid [beer] yeast selection. That, alone, is enough to keep me using liquid yeast strains.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder