Homebrewing myths that need to die

What the hell kind of IPA's are you making! If your recipe calls for Brewers Gold, use hops next time.

 

i just hit the threshold of not saving money anymore by home brewing. it was a nice thought starting out, but equipment upgrades always seem to happen. i've spent thousands on equipment and i don't even have a herms or rims. yet.

 

I am just saying I do save money. Just because you guys continue to upgrade doesn't mean everyone does. I am perfectly happy with 5 gallon batches that I can make now

 

Tow-may-tow, tow-mah-tow. For homebrewing, I count these as myths; the risk level is neglible for the typical home brewer. They certainly should not be the boogeyman that get thrown around.

But hey, every article I write has an opinion slant to it - I don't pretend otherwise. Feel free to write me off as a crackpot.

 

All homebrewers agree on the best practices to follow when brewing your own.

 

And that's fantastic! But it's pretty typical to see homebrewrs who don't save money (but do make great beer).

 

I agree. One thing I've noticed is that unless you have a an extremely tuned/trained palate, or have your beer torn apart (errrr....critiqued) by a national ranked judged, I really despise the typical "[insert HSA, tannins, phenols, autolysis, oxidation, etc.] is a myth because I don't taste it and my friends love my beer" posts.

It's had tannins, autolysis, oxidation, HSA, etc. noted by judges during various competitions.

Just because I can't taste/perceive them doesn't mean it is not there, and that there aren't some things I can do as a brewer to minimize many of the real "myths."

 

I would never suggest that something is a myth because I don't taste it. I don't think my palate is particularly sensitive.

I'm basing my information on the various studies and such that I read, as opposed to the "old wisdom" thats gets repeated time and time again (rack your beer as soon as gravity is stable, or you'll get autolysis).

 

Thanks for your continued input, Yooper. I fully intend to post links, as you are 100% correct that citations are needed.

 

Hmm, well if nothing else this thread has prompted me to do some real research of my own on autolysis. After a little reading, I am beginning to understand why there is so much disagreement on the subject.

 

gotta be honest, a lot of comments on homebrewing "myths" are so much more common that debunking the myths become the myths.

i have read tons of times that HSA and autolysis are myths, but I don't believe they are complete myths. i'm sure they can cause problems in certain situations. constant repetition of "its a myth, don't worry about it" becomes the new creed. i see that much more frequently than people actually asking about HSA

 

There's no question in my mind that I've tasted autolysis in my and other people's beers. It's a very distinctive soy sauce flavor, and I seem to be much more sensitive to it than my friends and family are.

I noticed it first in a delicate cider that sat on yeast for way, way to long, to the point that the color and texture of the cake began to change significantly. I've even gone so far as to cause yeast to autolyze on purpose so as to have a baseline flavor to compare against. Now, I taste it relatively frequently (even if its subtle) and without fail it always turns out to be from beer that has sat on too much yeast for too long at too hot a temperature.

The thing about these "myths" is that they spring their own counter-myths. People believe one dogma for a while, and then when holes start to appear they immediately produce a new dogma at the opposite extreme without considering the possibility that the truth might lay somewhere in the middle.

The greatest myths of brewing are just as often the counter-myths we cook up to dispel myths in the first place.

 

I got this straight from a LHBS employee:

"You can't use SANKE kegs. You need specialized equipment to open them."

 

What you're missing is the cost of the time you spend making it. If you spend 4 hours that could be used making $10 per hour then you have to add $40 to the cost of each batch. Of course, many will answer that they brew on their off time when they wouldn't be making anything anyways. This does not mean the time brewing is not an expense. It simply means that on non-brewing days off you spend the time (=money) on recreation or other activities.

Brewing-your-own costs more when all economic expenditures are figured in (not just exchange of dollars). However, it is worth it to have good beer that is your own to drink or share.

 

It does to me. My brewing time is far from an expense be it taken from me doing my work earning money or on my free time.

I save considerable money brewing my own beer, even with equipment factored in.

 

1. You need to grind your grain very fine to get decent efficiency with BIAB.

Research at BIABrewer.com has shown that you only need a standard crush to get decent efficiency with BIAB.

2. If you don't boil your pilsner malt for 90 minutes, you'll have lousy, corn-on-the-cob tasting beer.

 

I've experienced autolysis first hand once. I let a beer sit in primary for many months. I know it was the recipe. I took a sample before I forgot about it and tasted great, but I wanted to make sure it was done before bottling. to me, it tasted like rotted meat after I remembered it way too late.

 

High-end champagnes often have a very pronounced autolysis character, as do some (usually French) still chardonnay wines. I use these examples when I'm probing for autolysis in beer. It doesn't seem soy-sauce-ish at all to me, but it wouldn't be at all surprising if it did if the autolysis was over-the-top. I've definitely gotten soy-sauce character in microbrews that are experimenting with pushing the abv limits... for whatever reason.

 

HSA is not a myth. Happened to a batch i made. Mind you when I tasted it in the beer I knew exactly what went wrong. Don't aggressively stir your wort while it is still above 80 degrees when you are trying to cool it in the ice bath.

 

I suspect what I'm tasting are glutamates, which have a salty-savory taste and a distinctive mouth feel. I had a Tripel once that got really hot while being stored improperly, and my wife swore it tasted like ox-tail soup. Certainly wine critics will complain about champagnes being "brothy" if the autolysis on lees goes too far.

 

This would be true if:

A.) brewers didn't become "gadget whores"
B.) brewing beer leads to drinking more beer
C.) brewing leads to experimentation which leads to expensive batches

 

+1
I have definitely tasted autolysis in my beer, when it sat on yeast for 6 or 8 weeks. It was nasty. I got busy and forgot about it.
I will agree it should generally not occur the minute after FG is achieved- and the crappy kit instructions that say otherwise are faulty and tell newbies to rush a beer off yeast.

 

I've seen my own beers stale way too quickly, and the only reason I can think of is HSA. It was batch where I partigyled and blended the runnings to make an ESB and a special bitter, like Fuller's. There was quite a bit of splashing when I did the blending. The ESB made the NHC finals...and tasted like cardboard a few weeks later.

 

If you ask 10 homebrewers how to do something, you will get 11 answers!

It makes it "old wisdom"

What you are missing is that most people on here would consider homebrewing is a recreation activity

 

I don't think that's the point being made. In economics there is a term called "opportunity cost" and it refers to what you give up doing in order to do something else. For example let's say you have the choice between brewing and going to the beach. If you decide to brew the opportunity cost is going to the beach.

 

Exactly.

 

Correct. But when people say that you should take into account your hourly wage when determining the cost of your homebrew it implies that the opportunity cost of homebrewing is paid work. I would assume most people brew in their time off and do not take annual leave to brew so the opportunity cost of brewing is not paid work (at least for me - if there is no extra work to do then my employer won't pay me for any hours more than 40 a week) and therefore you should not factor your time into the cost of your beer.

 

I'll agree with that to an extent. In some jobs, not mine (though I do work with some folks who have a job like this), you can opt to work over time if it's available. So if over time is available and you opt to brew then you do need to factor in your wage. It all depends on your particular economic situation.

 

Myth: Non brewing related threads don't inevitably turn into pi$$ing matches. Every time.

 

Properly speaking, you'd then have to quantify in dollar terms and factor in the pleasure value of brewing and the displeasure costs of working, too.

...but who the #@$! wants to live like that?

 

Prost!

 

I brew because I enjoy it. Damn we are an opinionated and somewhat pissy bunch! What other myths can we come up with? And should we redefine myths as " bogeymen (or bogey women) and things that get too much negative hype in the homebrew world?"

Current autolysis experiment... http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f39/what-conditions-cause-autolysis-yeast-death-rupture-398024/

 

Ah gotcha, glad I am AG now and don't have to worry about figuring out what was wrong! Haha

 

You're hitting exactly what I'm getting at. I'm not looking for legalistic definitions of "myths", but of the boogeymen that get people worried for no real reason.

 

No it means I decided to stay home and have fun instead if sitting on a gritty coastal area fighting a seagull for my sandwich and wondering why the hell there is ice and food in the unfinished mash tun.

 

Such insight!

 

Okay. I was going to roll my eyes at "yet another economics post", but this line got me. Bravo.