High mash temperature and effects on alcohol % | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

High mash temperature and effects on alcohol %

Discussion in 'Fermentation & Yeast' started by kujosp, Dec 6, 2014.

 

  1. #1
    kujosp

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    If a mash was subjected to higher temperatures causing more unfermentable sugars and the resulting final gravity of that beer would be much higher than anticipated, would that cause the alcohol to be reduced as well? The reason I ask is because the amount of fermentable sugars shouldn't have changed as temperatures in the higher ranges will also release fermentable sugars at the same rate. So if my final gravity is stuck at 1.035 can I assume that the alcohol content is higher than calculated?


    Sent from my iPhone using Home Brew
     
  2. #2
    chuckcomm

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    I believe it will be lower..What was the OG?
     
  3. #3
    kujosp

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    1.057 OG target FG 1.015



    Sent from my iPhone using Home Brew
     
  4. #4
    chuckcomm

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
  5. #5
    kujosp

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    Unfermentable sugars add to the gravity correct? If they do then wouldnt that add to the final gravity but at the same Time the fermentable sugars which should've produced at the same rate during the mash if it was at 150F. Those sugars should've been converted into alcohol in their entirety causing a higher final gravity but the same alcohol percentage.


    Sent from my iPhone using Home Brew
     
  6. #6
    mdharris99

    Active Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    "Unfermentable" means that the yeast can't break them down to alcohol. Fewer fermentable sugars would mean a lower alcohol content and a sweeter tasting beer.
     
  7. #7
    chuckcomm

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    My last brew that I bottled today had a mash temp that got away from me while I was not paying attention. It went up to around 165 or a bit higher before I caught it. It was only about 10 deg higher than the 156 mash temp I wanted but I was worried. OG was 1.063 and I ended at 1.012 so it worked out for me with roughly a 7% ABV
     
  8. #8
    kujosp

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014

    Thanks for the definition....


    Sent from my iPhone using Home Brew
     
  9. #9
    kujosp

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    Attenuation effects maybe?


    Sent from my iPhone using Home Brew
     
  10. #10
    kujosp

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    my issue was a location/failure of a gauge and I believe the entire batch was mashed very high. I hit OG though so enzyme activity wasn't detrimentally effected.


    Sent from my iPhone using Home Brew
     
  11. #11
    govner1

    Kept Man!  

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    Your OG is based on all the sugars you extracted during your mash, fermentable & non- fermentable.
    With the high mash temp you pretty eliminated the beta amylase activity and probably the alpha amylase activity was at best limited.
    All of this wi give you a good OG but the yeast cannot convert it to EtOh and CO2, ie, alcohol. Thus, even though your OF was good your FG was diminished because your yeast had less fermentables.
     
  12. #12
    azscoob

    Brewpub coming soon!

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    This is absolutely correct, there Isnt additional sugars created at the higher temp, the existing sugars just aren't broken down completely so they never ferment into alcohol in the first place... :(
     
  13. #13
    kujosp

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    In the book homebrewing engineering I thought there was a series of graphs at various temperatures and all of them showing the alpha rate staying consistent with the beta rate obviously increasing with increased temperature. Obviously I'm missing something


    Sent from my iPhone using Home Brew
     
  14. #14
    kujosp

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014

    That could be what I'm missing. I was under the impression that both were present


    Sent from my iPhone using Home Brew
     
  15. #15
    kujosp

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    Thanks guys I need to go back and reread something but in the end it looks like I have a low Alcohol percentage beer no biggie, just trying to understand it a little better.


    Sent from my iPhone using Home Brew
     
  16. #16
    govner1

    Kept Man!  

    Posted Dec 6, 2014

    The beta amylase works best at lower mash temps and the alpha at higher. There is a range, the brewers window, which is best for both.
    That being said, the OP, far exceeded the effective temp range for both.
    He did get some activity as the denature get process isn't instantaneous but he certainly missed the "window"!
     
  17. #17
    Clankenbrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 6, 2014
    I had a similar issue. Mashed a bit low 148F thinking my og would be a bit higher then did a 169 batch sparge for 15 minutes. Ended with og 1.086 but then its stuck at 1.036.. Not sure if its unfermentable or under pitched and Im thinking repitch... What do u think?
     
  18. #18
    WoodlandBrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 7, 2014
    The graphs on page 44? I guess it's a little hard to tell, but the slopes are different. The fermentability results on page 46 might demonstrate the difference better.
     
  19. #19
    Saiko

    Well-Known Member  

    Posted Dec 7, 2014
    Maybe this will help.

    enzyme_activity_one_hour_mash.jpg
     
  20. #20
    kujosp

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 7, 2014

    Thank you


    Sent from my iPhone using Home Brew
     
  21. #21
    kujosp

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 7, 2014

    Yes it was page 44, just got back home and pulled it out.


    Sent from my iPhone using Home Brew
     
  22. #22
    kujosp

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 7, 2014
    Woodland love your book, I must have interpreted the graphs incorrectly. Tough to remember everything out of every book you read and my minds eye failed me. Thanks everyone for straightening me out a bit. I just finished my 6th all grain batch and I'm hoping the bugs have been worked out of my system.


    Sent from my iPhone using Home Brew
     
    azscoob likes this.
  23. #23
    azscoob

    Brewpub coming soon!

    Posted Dec 9, 2014
    I'm still trying to get all the bugs worked out of my brew system, and I've been brewing since 2009 :mug:
     
  24. #24
    WoodlandBrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 9, 2014
    Thanks! I'm glad you have enjoyed it. One of the things I like most about brewing is that there is always something to tweak.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder