Do i need to age my AG beers?

When I did extract I always aged the beer to let it mellow out. I have been doing 10gal AG batches for over a year now (80+ gallons) and I recently have been doing less aging. I mostly brew ipas and pale ales. 10-14 days in primary and 1-2 weeks in a secondary (maybe dry hopping) then straight to keg, cold, carb, and serve. Would I be gaining anything by letting it age warm in the keg? Obviously I would prefer not to wait but if waiting would improve the beer noticeably then so be it.

 

Let me add that I have not noticed a difference between aging or not, just curious what other people think, or perceived differences in their own beers.

 

If you're fermenting at the right temp, a lot of beers (especially those meant to be consumed young. IPAs, etc) are fine packaging at 3 weeks, assuming fermentation went well.

 

There is no hard and fast rule about aging. Some beers benefit from it, some don't. Ultimately it comes down to what your own tatse buds tell you.

 

I think you answered your own question! If you're happy with it, that's all that matters. And IMO there's no difference in aging requirements between all grain and extract, assuming you're nailing ferm temps and using proper pitch rates (as others have mentioned).

I think it's very, very style dependent. A hoppy IPA or pale ale is best very fresh, as is a yeasty hefe. A homebrew IPA is never nearly as flavorful after 3-4 months, and a hefeweizen doesn't taste as fresh or bright with some age on it.

If you were exclusively making a BDS or RIS, I'd say yes, you need to age them. But with the beers that you're making you should be fine.

 

Why would you think there would be a different need for an Ag beer as opposed to an extract? It's still beer, no matter whether you mashed the grains or a maltser mashed the grains for you (that's all extract is) the final product is the same....

 

I found that with specialty beers like my pumpkin ale, it does need time, about 6 weeks for flavors to blend and mellow. I've tried my pumpkin at 4 weeks and again at 6.....big difference in smoothness.

 

I've always noticed my beer getting better with age, but it's pretty good (I'm heavily biased of course) right out of the gate. honestly, if my beer's aging, it's because I'm not a huge fan of a particular style, so I'll drink a fistful and leave it sit, and come back to it a month or two later. I have some ESB from the summer I brewed that I'm thinking about dragging out.

 

Good point. No good reason, I just had in my head that the magic of all grain would eliminate the need to age it. I have two 5 gallon fermenters full of India brown ale. Ill have to age one longer than the other and see if there is a difference.

 

Beer is beer, it has the same needs regardless of how it is made. It's the same with kegging over bottling....a lot of people THINK you don't have to condition a keg of beer....and they find themselves drinking carbed GREEN beer, if they burst carb it. All kegging does is carbonate a beer, it doesn't change whether or not it needs conditioning. In fact if you look at BobbyMs kegging thread, you'll see that slow carbing is the preferred method of carbing, it still takes approximately 3 weeks to carb a beer with the set and forget method...this also allows for conditioning to occur.

You can't escape the fact that some beers need some time for the flavors to marry each other.

 

Every now and then I'll keg a beer that needs more time. I taste it, write notes and then a week later it's a different beer. And a month later it's a different beer than when we started (and when i say we i mean the beer and I's relationship).

The beauty of this hobby is watching the change in things.