diecetyl rest for my lager, why? | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

diecetyl rest for my lager, why?

Discussion in 'Fermentation & Yeast' started by mesooohoppy, Feb 17, 2016.

 

  1. #1
    mesooohoppy

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Feb 17, 2016
    okay, I have been reading up plenty about diecetyl and the diecetyl rest. it seems easy enough, just turn my fridge off (I have a dedicated mini fridge for fementation), and wait a couple of days before cold crash/lagering.

    but I started thinking, why? why would you purposely try to create diecetyl just to get rid of it?

    I used s23 lager yeast (yes, I know, not the best, it was all I had), and am fermenting in the 'optimum range'. shouldn't that keep diecetyl at bay?

    plenty of articles out there on what to do, and what happens, but once I started looking for the reason why its done (other than to produce diecetyl, just to get rid of it), I couldn't find any info.

    help?
     
  2. #2
    Gavin C

    Well-Known Member  

    Posted Feb 17, 2016
    You wouldn't.

    The objective is not to create diacetyl with a diacetyl rest but to speed along its elimination. Warm temperatures allowing the yeast to metabolize this unwanted fermentation product more rapidly.

    As with many things prevention is the best form of cure and there are ways to target minimizing the production of diacetyl.
     
    kombat and TexasDroughtBrewery like this.
  3. #3
    mesooohoppy

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Feb 17, 2016
    link: http://byo.com/stories/item/303-brewing-science-controlling-diacetyl

    to me, that sounds like I am purposely creating diacetyl by raising the tempature. I totally understand the prevention thing, I had assumed that had something to do with it. I understand that the yeast will work quicker at higher temps, but according to that quote, more diecetyl can be created. am I not reading that correctly?

    I have no problem doing a rest. Hell, all I have to do is turn off my fridge and leave the door open for 2 days. Just trying to understand it all (knowledge=power). :)

    p.s. maybe i should learn how to spell the damn word...
     
  4. #4
    blizz81

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Feb 17, 2016

    I think, in the words of BYO, this is the mindblow you're missing:


    "Not only do yeast produce the precursor to diacetyl, they also consume the diacetyl that is produced and enzymatically reduce it."


    Different things happen at different phases of fermentation. You don't want to warm up your lager yeast at the beginning or amid peak fermentation activity. But once fermentation has neared completion, that is when you would intentionally raise the temp for a diacetyl rest. You won't be creating diacetyl at this point - if that had happened, it would have been a result of the lag / exponential growth phase.
     
  5. #5
    DemonsRun

    Well-Known Member  

    Posted Feb 17, 2016
    From the article "Even though the diacetyl can’t be tasted, however, the beer might contain high levels of the precursor, acetolactate, which can be converted to diacetyl. Once the yeast is removed, there is no way to get rid of the diacetyl."


    The rest is not just for the yeast to eat the diacetyl but also to try to convert the acetolactate to diacetyl while the yeast is still active so that it can be consumed and not cause off-flavors later. The conversion of acetolactate to Diacetyl does not require heat and can happen later after cold crashing or bottling/kegging.
     
  6. #6
    mesooohoppy

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Feb 17, 2016
    I think this is what I was missing the most. I thought when the temps raised, more was created (on top of what was already in the beer).

    Now, the 'mind blow' makes more sense. thank you!


    I did not know this either! I love this forum, such a wealth of knowledge.
    thank you all for the help, I believe I understand diacetyl, acetolactate, and what happens a lot clearer than I did a couple of hours ago.

    So then, next question: I do the diacetyl rest for 48 hours. Do I cold crash, then rack to secondary to lager? Or should I rack to secondary then cold crash/lager?
     
  7. #7
    Gavin C

    Well-Known Member  

    Posted Feb 17, 2016
    I vote neither. (I am not a proponent of using a secondary.)
     
  8. #8
    Stonga

    Member

    Posted Feb 17, 2016

    Seen a lot of different opinions on this. Consensus seems to be to lager off the primary yeast cake.

    How long would you lager in primary?
     
  9. #9
    Stonga

    Member

    Posted Feb 17, 2016
    So how long would you lager for in primary? Consensus seems to be to take the beer off the yeast cake and lager in a secondary to avoid yeasty flavours.
     
  10. #10
    biestie

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Feb 17, 2016

    I'd lager in the keg.
     
    kombat likes this.
  11. #11
    Gavin C

    Well-Known Member  

    Posted Feb 17, 2016
    I wouldn't

    I get my lagers off the yeast and into a keg as rapidly as practical. Usually at around the 2 week mark. They lager at ~34F in the keg while carbonating.

    If you bottle the same can be done in the bottle after carbonation has occured.
     
    mesooohoppy likes this.
  12. #12
    Jim311

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Feb 17, 2016
    I agree completely, lager in the keg and skip secondary.
     
    mesooohoppy likes this.
  13. #13
    mesooohoppy

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 2, 2016
    As soon as I get home my first lager will be pulled from the fridge to start it's diacetyl rest.

    Just wanted to thank ya'll again :)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder