Did my RIS really ferment to 1.004?? | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

Did my RIS really ferment to 1.004??

Discussion in 'Fermentation & Yeast' started by tyzippers, Mar 6, 2013.

 

  1. #1
    tyzippers

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 6, 2013
    Ok ladies and gentlemen, I would like your opinion on the following matter:

    A week and a half ago I brewed an RIS I concocted that has the following grainbill:

    13 lbs Marris Otter
    7 lbs 2-Row
    2 lbs Cara Pils
    10 oz Chocolate Malt
    8 oz Carafa III

    12 oz. Molasses (added in fermenter at 5 days old)

    Yeast: 2 vials of fresh WLP099

    So here's the deal. I was aiming for a 151°F mash, actual was about 149°F. My calcs tell me that I should have started the ferment with 5 GAL of 1.128 wort. Probably less due to the molasses being added in the fermenter during fermentation. Either way, this was a HUGE beer! My problem is that I realized that my hydrometer was broken on brewday so I was unable to get an OG reading. :smack: So I just said, "Self, just go have a homebrew and relax. That's what Charlie P would say!" So I did. Now, a week and a half later, I checked my gravity and it is reading 1.004! Yes, before you ask, I did read it right! (I can provide a picture if you don't believe me!) I fully expected this thing to hang out around 1.026 or so as a FG.

    So, here's my thoughts. Either I actually did come close to 1.128 and actually fermented down to 1.004, or I came nowhere near my intended target and this beer is a wussy RIS.

    I'm leaning toward the former because A) My fermentation clogged my blow-off tube and blew krausen all over my basement ceiling B) Upon tasing the beer, it is quite dry with a touch of heat from alcohol and C) It is VERY dry to the taste!

    So, what do yinz guys and gals think I have? A kick a$$ RIS or a RWS (Russian Wussy Stout)?? Penny for your thoughts?:mug:
     
  2. #2
    Kaiser

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 6, 2013
    Even if your OG was lower than expected, this is 95%+ attenuation. With simple mashing you won't get wort that fermentable, even if you add almost a pound of sugar.

    But you mention that it does taste dry.

    For $35 you can send a sample to White Labs and get a final answer. :) They'll be able to tell you the OG and FG.

    You said you read the hydrometer correct. Does it also read 1.000 in water?

    Kai
     
  3. #3
    tyzippers

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 6, 2013
    That is a good point. I hadn't thought of that.

    Right! The taste is about on par with what I expected.

    I did not know that. If this question becomes a burning hole in my mind, I might consider that!

    Another good thought. I never thought about verifying the reading of a brand new hydrometer. Though as an engineer you'd think I would've thought of that. Either way, I just checked it and it read 1.000. Then I took another sample of the RIS and again it read only 4 points higher! I'm confused.
     
  4. #4
    Piratwolf

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 6, 2013
    I find this logic very confusing. :drunk:
    A) Dark beers often have violent fermentation--from what I understand that's not necessarily 100% tied to OG, so I'm not sure this is useful.
    B) "a touch of heat from alcohol"... is this understatement? A beer going from 1.128 to 1.004 would be HUGELY alcoholic!
    C) Dryness is a statement related mostly to the FG, and as far as I know not at all to the OG of a beer.

    It's hard for me to imagine a yeast getting 99.6+% apparent attenuation or a beer going 1.128--1.004 without being so full of hot fusels and so boozy as to be nigh undrinkable after a mere 10 days.

    My vote: RWS. On the plus side, you just created a new BJCP category :cross:
     
  5. #5
    forstmeister

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 6, 2013
    Dumb question: is it measuring gravity in Brix, or balling scale perhaps? That would put you around 1.016-1.018 if that were the case.
     
  6. #6
    tyzippers

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 6, 2013
    Piratwolf, this whole thing is confusing me. My logic was probably stunted by trying to explain something I find truly contradictory.

    I wouldn't consider that a dumb question! It's a perfectly legitimate question! The answer to which is that the hydrometer has both Brix and SG scales on it. This much I'm certain of: I was reading the SG scale. Thanks for checking though!
     
  7. #7
    bmick

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 7, 2013
    I'd have to assume that you undershot your OG on this. Looking at the recipe, it has a very low % of specialty grains. If you have a very fermentable wort (which you will mashing that low), undershot your OG, added sugar to the fermenter, and pitched 2 vials of a super high-attenuating yeast...yeah...you could get to 1.004 after a violent fermentation. The low OG would also account for the fact that it doesn't have a hot fusel taste (if you really went from 1.1+ to 1.004 in a week it would have a very solventy taste to it).

    Best bet moving forward would be to save some of the wort in a sealed container if you can't take an OG reading on brew-day (this is why I love my refractometer, tough to break :)). If the beer tastes good, you're all set.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder