Brettanomyces Bruxellensis question | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

Brettanomyces Bruxellensis question

Discussion in 'Lambic & Wild Brewing' started by avj3, Jul 13, 2010.

 

  1. #1
    avj3

    Member

    Posted Jul 13, 2010
    I am new to the forum, but have been brewing for 5 years now. I have searched this forum and others for similar questions but haven't found any, so if its out there be gentle. Here goes...

    I am attempting to brew an Orval clone. The recipe calls for a White Labs WLP650 (Brettanomyces Bruxellensis) yeast for secondary fermentation. I know that the lambic bacteria's and "wild" yeasts can cross-contaminate equipment which can be bad news for brewing regular beer.

    So my question to you all is will this Brettanomyces Bruxellensis used in secondary fermentation ruin my equipment for other brews? Will I need to replace everything that the Brett touches (carboy, keg, siphon and hoses), the soft stuff (siphon & hoses), or nothing at all. Has anyone tried brewing a "regular" beer in the same equipment after using the Brett?

    Thanks for the help!
     
  2. #2
    Mylo

    Member

    Posted Jul 13, 2010
    Brett dies in starsan, like other yeasts. Semi-porous equipment like hoses, stoppers, siphons, o-rings, etc. should be segregrated, however, as Brett has been known to get into the pores of that stuff. Keep a set of the soft stuff for sours. No need to keep separate carboys though.

    You can re-purpose a keg that was used for sours, but you should completely disassemble and replace the o-rings.


    Mylo
     
  3. #3
    Grizzlybrew

    Well-Known Member  

    Posted Jul 13, 2010
    not to highjack, but just finishing "brew like a monk", there is a clone recipe in the back. Among the instructions, are to just use the dregs from two bottles of Orval (as they are not using a pure strain of brett).

    As to your original question, Vinnie Cirluzo says that "(Brett is) like a dog. When you are afraid of a dog, he senses that. You can't let (the yeast) sense you are afraid." He then went on to say "Of course, we keep different hoses, different pumps and gaskets, rubber, two of everything."
     
  4. #4
    scone

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 13, 2010
    I've had good luck (knock on wood) reusing auto-siphons, siphon hose, bottling bucket, and spigot. But I keep a dedicated plastic fermenter, lid, stopper, and airlock. Basically I reuse anything I can clean very quickly after it touches the brett beer, and dedicate anything the brett sits on for a long time. So far no cross-contamination.
     
  5. #5
    Lodovico

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 13, 2010
    In my opinion, unless money is really tight for you (which I understand) for piece of mind I would "recycle" the equipment you have now and make it your Wild Brew Equipment and buy new stuff for your normal beers.

    I just did this and it cost a total of $30 which is well worth it if you know you are going to brew even a couple sour beers a year. I know for sure of a couple good brewers who contaminated their brewery and it was a pain for sure. Just my .02 cents.
     
  6. #6
    jessup

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 13, 2010
    do yourself a favor and buy seperate plastic like tubing, racking cane, silicon bungs, etc. i've had more than my fair share of cross contaminations to learn from. i did not fear the brett and ran with it only to find non-soured batches going sour after a few weeks. carboys, better bottles (i think) and corny's can be cleaned and reused but any plastic is as good as soured.
     
  7. #7
    avj3

    Member

    Posted Jul 14, 2010
    Thank you all for the feedback. Unfortunately (or fortunately depending how you look at it) I just bought myself a complete kegging setup including kegerator. I have not yet even run a keg through it yet. I was thinking that my Orval clone would be the perfect first beer to run through it. From what I have learned from you all is that the lines connecting the keg to the tap will be contaminated with the Brett (obviously something I am not looking to do).

    So another question for you, has anyone tried brewing the orval clone without using the Brett? Or using a trappist ale yeast instead of the Brett in the secondary? Will the taste be ruined if the brett is not pitched in the secondary. I certainly don't want to ruin the beer, but I would rather not ruin my equipment either.

    Thanks again for the help
     
  8. #8
    Grizzlybrew

    Well-Known Member  

    Posted Jul 16, 2010
    Hose is cheap, as are picnic taps... why not just keep an extra setup on hand for any brett/sour beers you do.

    As far as the flavor, you won't ruin the flavor of the beer, you just won't have that characteristic brett/Orval flavor. That flavor is what makes Orval what it is and one of the reasons many argue that Orval is a style in and of itself.
     
  9. #9
    Lodovico

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 19, 2010
    +1 on all of this.
     
  10. #10
    dirtybear7

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Sep 27, 2010
    I've made two attempts at brett beer. The first I used dregs from Orval at bottling and have so far gotten very little brett character. I made an Orval clone style that used Wyeast Brettanomyces bruxellensis at bottling, and after about a month it was the best beer I had ever made. I would suggest bottling any Orval clone because part of what makes it so good is the high level of carbonation. I believe higher than a keg set-up can reach.
     
  11. #11
    JesseRYC

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Sep 27, 2010
    I highly doubt one can get higher levels of carbonation inside of glass bottles than inside of stainless steel kegs. Especially since you can adjust psi to higher levels on your regulator. Most kegs max pressure is 130 psi, this is waaaay higher than the tolerance of glass.
     
  12. #12
    dirtybear7

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Sep 28, 2010
    I thought I read in "Brewing with Wheat" by Hieronymus that some German wheat beer brewers bottle because the can get higher carb levels. I thought it was the same with some Belgians. I will have to reread.
     
  13. #13
    JayInJersey

    Well-Known Member  

    Posted Sep 28, 2010
    In order to get the higher levels of carbonation AND server it you'll need Beergas...otherwise you'll have all head and no beer.
     
  14. #14
    ryane

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Sep 28, 2010
    I was gonna say that there could be issues serving, by why couldnt you just increase the line length until it equalized the pressure??
     
  15. #15
    Brew_Meister_General

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 2, 2015
    Oh wow, it sounds like a real issue then, would rinsing everything thoroughly with StarSan and PBW not save it from cross-contamination?
     
  16. #16
    Mexicanconnection2002

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 2, 2015
    I have had nice results using brett b fermenting with ale yeast in primary for about 6-7 days, then racking to keg. I add the brett in the keg and leave at room temp for 2-8 months, releasing pressure on keg once a week or so. I have a couple dedicated funky kegs. I always use a picnic tap to keep kegerator lines clean.
     
  17. #17
    sweetcell

    Supporting Member  

    Posted Dec 2, 2015
    not with plastic and rubber/vinyl, at least that's the approach most people take. the fear is that those soft materials can be scratched, and microbes are much smaller than yeast and can hide in the scratches in places that the cleaners and sanitizers can't get in to.

    glass and stainless are smooth, nowhere for bugs to hide - so pbw + star san works fine.
     
    Brew_Meister_General likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder