Any reason to switch from batch to fly sparging? | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

Any reason to switch from batch to fly sparging?

Discussion in 'All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing' started by Rolly, Mar 14, 2011.

 

  1. #1
    Rolly

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 14, 2011
    So far I'm getting between 75-80% efficiency by batch sparging. Its really simple and enables me to walk away during the sparge process (I have small kids). Are there really any tangible benefits of fly sparging if my efficiency isn't an issue?
     
  2. #2
    Yooper

    Ale's What Cures You! Staff Member  

    Posted Mar 14, 2011
    No. If the beer tastes great, and the process works for you then there isn't a reason to change.

    Sometimes I fly sparge, but sometimes I'm in a hurry or I just don't feel like fly sparging so I batch sparge. I would say the quality of the wort is the same, so I think it's simply brewer's preference and/or equipment.
     
  3. #3
    sudbuster

    This ain't my first rodeo....  

    Posted Mar 14, 2011
    Yeah, exactly what Yooper said. Years ago, I thought it was better to follow "style" and fly sparge lagers and batch sparge ales. That was stupid.
     
  4. #4
    arturo7

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 14, 2011
    same same

    I would love see to a paper that says fly is better.
     
  5. #5
    Bobby_M

    Vendor and Brewer  

    Posted Mar 14, 2011
    Yes, there's a good reason. You'll learn a process that half the home brewing community uses and learning is great. Whether it does anything for the beer itself is debatable.
     
  6. #6
    bufitfn

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 14, 2011
    I always batch sparge and get 80-83% all the time so I see no reason to change.
     
  7. #7
    imperialipa

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 14, 2011
    I fly sparge and last batch got me 85%.... Have never batch sparged. But if Batch is working I see no real reason to switch...

    Unless like Bobby noted you want to learn a new process.
     
  8. #8
    DannPM

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 14, 2011
    I found fly vs batch gives me about 5% more efficiency. Sounds like you're getting pretty good efficiency as it stands though so no need to change. If you really want to fly sparge in your situation there is one option...

    [​IMG]
     
  9. #9
    bigbeergeek

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 14, 2011
    I get 89% efficiency on the nose with my fly sparge... I've never done a batch sparge. I know someday soon I'll invest the extra $1 in grain and give it a try. Seems like an easy way to shave 30-60 minutes off your brew day.
     
  10. #10
    Posted Mar 14, 2011
    78-82 pct with fly sparge, 78-82 pct with batch sparge. Both take me 1 hour.

    M_C
     
  11. #11
    bigbeergeek

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 14, 2011
    I imagined that batch sparging would be faster and produce lower efficiencies. Interesting...
     
  12. #12
    Northcalais40

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 14, 2011
    No. Though you may enjoy doing it differently.
     
  13. #13
    williamnave

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 15, 2011
    Even though it takes longer, I found fly sparging to be rather relaxing, easy way to do it. Once you have your sparge arm/flow dialed in, you can pretty much walk away and just check on the kettle every 15-20 mins to see when you hit your volume.

    Last brew day I got the sparge running, then went inside and had lunch + beer.
     
  14. #14
    lamarguy

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Mar 15, 2011
    FWIW, there is a considerable loss of efficiency when batch sparging high gravity beers (1.080+). But, grain is relatively cheap...
     
  15. #15
    Posted Mar 15, 2011
    For my batch sparge, I'm limited by equipment. My HLT tank is a 5-gallon kettle, which I refill after adding a batch. Most of the times, the mash tun will drain out faster than I can bring the next batch of water up to 170F.

    ... I really should invest in a larger HLT. :D

    M_C
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder