48 qt vs. 70 qt mash-ton | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

48 qt vs. 70 qt mash-ton

Discussion in 'All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing' started by Creepersale, Dec 12, 2012.

 

  1. #1
    Creepersale

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 12, 2012
    48 qt is $21.00 and the 70 Qt is $39.00
    The question is I already have a 15 gal boil kettle.
    But still do 5 gallon batches. So every once in awhile I would like to be able to to do a 10 gal batch so is 48 qt. cooler big enough ? Or would I be limited to smaller gravity beers in the 48 qt. ?
     
  2. #2
    fnord

    don't see me  

    Posted Dec 12, 2012
    Really useful chart by BobbyM in this thread: http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f11/how-big-your-mash-tun-needs-123585/

    It depends on what you think you'll need and your system, but I'd lean toward the smaller. Less dead space should mean less heat loss. With my setup I sometimes batch sparge and sometimes fly sparge, more deadspace here lets me get all my sparge water added to the tun and focus on something else while it runs off, but I think the benefit of temp maintenance outweighs this.
     
  3. #3
    chumpsteak

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 12, 2012
    I do all 10 gallon batches with a 48qt mash ton. Have done up to 1.080 gravities.
     
  4. #4
    Creepersale

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 12, 2012
    Wow. Ok great guess I will go with the 48 and save save some money. I expected everyone to lean towards the bigger one but. Good deal !!! Thanks.

    Cheers and beers !!!
     
  5. #5
    worksnorth

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 12, 2012
    Soooo did you do the 48? and if you had it to do over again... would you do the 70? I'm fixing to do the 70 coleman extreme and am wondering how things worked out for you?
    Cheers!
     
  6. #6
    Creepersale

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 12, 2012
    And great chart link explains it great don't know I thought I needed a 70qt. A 48 qt will do fine up to 10 gallons of a 1.060 beer is great.
     
  7. #7
    worksnorth

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 12, 2012
    Huh?
     
  8. #8
    worksnorth

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 12, 2012
    1.060 beer? What's that?
     
  9. #9
    Creepersale

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 12, 2012
    I just picked up the 48. So haven't used it yet. But there is a brew or two I like to brew that's about 1.080. I'll be able to do them but just limit to 5 or 6 gallons. Also I only need one keg. plus would hate tie up two kegs to age 2 months for a big beer anyway. Hope that helped

    Cheers and beeeers. !!!!
     
  10. #10
    Creepersale

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 12, 2012
    That's the measurement of fermentables in your wort. The higher the number the bigger it and essentially the higher ABV % which 1.060 beer depending on you final gravity ( after its done fermenting ) could be up too 6% ABV

    Cheers and beers
     
  11. #11
    worksnorth

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Dec 12, 2012
    I'm sorry! I was being a smart ass when I asked about the " what is 1.060 beer". Was my feeble attempt to play like 1.060 was itty bitty, but it's really not. I've got a ten gallon igloo cooler I mash with, I'm thinking about going to a 70 qt Coleman. So I guess that was why I asked the original question. I already know that my ten gallon cooler is to small for a lot of beers in ten gallon batches. I've had to fortify many of them with extract during the boil to bump the ABV up where it needs to be.
    Sorry for being a jackass! Thanks for the help
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder