42 gallons yeast starter... advices please... | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

42 gallons yeast starter... advices please...

Discussion in 'Fermentation & Yeast' started by dudybrew, Jul 30, 2012.

 

  1. #1
    dudybrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    Hey all...
    Me and my friends are going to make a 160 liters batch of pilsner to try out our newly tweaked 200L refrigerated conical fermentor. I know it´s crazy but we are doing it anyway...
    We are trying to figure out how much of a starter we'll need to make, taking in consideration that we are brewing a 1.047 OG pilsner and are going to use only dry yeast.
    We need some advice on making it efficiently cost-effective. Meaning we want to use as little dry yeast packages as possible and work out the step starters... I guess...
    I understand that we should pitch as closer to the needed amount of cells as possible so not to get esters right?
    anyway.... I might be confused now but need your help guys... cheers...
     
  2. #2
    a6ladd

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    What exactly are you going to make your starter in haha? Mr. Malty says 10 packets of dry yeast into about 28L water should do the trick. You might be able to get away with doing it in a corny keg and pitching straight out of that.
     
  3. #3
    dudybrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    If we use 10 packets of yeast it would be pricier than whole batch itself. We were thinking scaling up the starters...
     
  4. #4
    dudybrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    oh and we have the 20 l buckets and 60 l containers for it...
     
  5. #5
    dudybrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    Wouldnt a 20L starter be proportional to pitching a vial in a 5 gallon batch?
     
  6. #6
    broadbill

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    Why not take the yeast from a couple of 5 gallon batches of beer, instead of doing some elaborate starter?

    Heck, you might even consider packaging and drinking that beer!:)
     
  7. #7
    broadbill

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    As an aside, why is it crazy to make a 160L batch in a 200L conical? I mean, isn't that why you built such a large fermenter in the first place?....to, you know, fill it up?

    I hope you didn't built that puppy and just to run 40L batches through it....
     
  8. #8
    a6ladd

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    Well what kind of yeast are you going to use? 10 packets of dry would be pretty cheap but I can see why you'd want to build a few packets/vials of liquid yeast up. Do you have an aeration device? You could build it up much faster that way.
     
  9. #9
    dudybrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    @broadbill... of course we were planning to make big batches like that... but I dont know it sounds kinda really big to me now... hehe...
    @a6ladd... we havent decided which yeast yet... but we are in Brazil and this stuff dont come out cheap here... hehe I was thinking the shaking aeration type hehehe
     
  10. #10
    Jaybird

    Sponsor  

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    Whatever you do, get ready to make batch #2 once you package this one so you dont have to buy yeast for the second go around.

    Cheers
    Jay
     
  11. #11
    a6ladd

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    Yes do EXACTLY what Jay said. Id give Saflager W-34/70 a try, itll be cheap and effective for the first run. Cheers!
     
  12. #12
    brycelarson

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    Why not do a couple of 5 or 10 gallon batches as "starters"
     
  13. #13
    dudybrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    @ Jaybird... we certainly will... hehe
     
  14. #14
    dudybrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    I was thinking a 5 gallon batch for starter and pitch... but wasnt certain it would be enough...
     
    barryshomebrew likes this.
  15. #15
    dudybrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    ok... an idea... what if I make a 20L starter...2 days before brewing... then I brew the 160 lot put 120 into the big fermentor to sit and wait while a take 40L of the wort to work as a second step of the starter for a couple of days and then pitch everything in the big fermentor?
     
  16. #16
    Cellarbrau

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    4L Starter

    20L in carboy

    60L in conical

    160L in conical
     
  17. #17
    phillyhomebrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 30, 2012
    I know this isn't the same, but we did a 60 gallon lambic and 4 days before brewing the 60 gallons, I did a simple 5 gallon batch, pitched 1 vial of ECY01, then used the entire 5 gallon carboy as the starter for the 60 gallons (Ah, run on sentences).

    The barrel started fermenting in less than 24 hours. Comprende?
     
  18. #18
    Sulli

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 31, 2012
    You could probably get your cell count in 3 big steps.

    1 - pitch 1 satchet of rehydratated dry yeast into a 3 liter starter on a stir plate.

    2 - decant, and dump that slurry into a 6 liter starter.

    3 - decant, and dump this slurry into a 12 liter starter.

    Once that ferments out you should be pretty darn close to your recommended pitch rate.

    Check out this starter calc YeastCalc.


    Enter your wort parameters up top.

    Input '200' into your initial cell count, (this is approximately how many cells are in an 11.5g sachet of dry yeast.)

    Choose 'stir plate' as the method of aeration for all your steps. (I'm assuming you have a stir plate.)

    Then play with the starter volumes until you come up with something workable for your equipment set-up.

    Have fun with your brew, sounds awesome.

    :mug:
     
  19. #19
    dudybrew

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 31, 2012
    Thanks everyone for the advices...
    @Sulli is it true that a sachet of dry yeast has 200 billion viable cells? I've read many times that's got something between 60 and 80 only...
     
  20. #20
    rack04

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 31, 2012
    From what I have read it is assumed by most that there are 20 billion viable yeast cells per gram of dried yeast.
     
  21. #21
    Sulli

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Jul 31, 2012
    Safale states in their spec sheet that there are 6 x 10^9/gram (6 billion cells/gram) viable cells at packaging.

    6,000,000,000 x 11.5g = 69 billion cells per satchet.

    But then I've been shown this quote from the Mr. Malty website.

    "Some exciting work has been done on dry yeast lately. Reports are coming in of better quality, cleaner dry yeast. Personally, I really prefer the liquid yeasts, but the lure of dry yeast is strong. The biggest benefit is that it is cheap and does not require a starter. In fact, with most dry yeasts, placing them in a starter would just deplete the reserves that the yeast manufacturer worked so hard to build into the yeast. Most dry yeast has an average cell density of 20 billion cells per gram. You would need about 9.5 grams of dry yeast if you were pitching into 5.5 gallons of 1.048 wort to get the proper cell counts. (Recently there have been other numbers mentioned for cells/gram of dry yeast and folks have asked me why I believe there are 20 billion cells. I've actually done cell counts on dry yeast and they're always 20 billion per gram +/- less than a billion. Dr. Clayton Cone has also stated that there are 20 billion per gram, and other folks I trust tell me that 20 billion is correct. Until I see something different, practical experience tells me this number is correct.) For dry yeasts, just do a proper rehydration in tap water, do not do a starter." ​

    Seems a little strange that the manufacturer would publish inaccurate information on their product, but I've not seen any information refuting what Jamil has stated either.

    Maybe someone more knowledgeable than me has some better answers.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder