100% specialty grain | HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk by donating:

  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We have a new forum and it needs your help! Homebrewing Deals is a forum to post whatever deals and specials you find that other homebrewers might value! Includes coupon layering, Craigslist finds, eBay finds, Amazon specials, etc.
    Dismiss Notice

100% specialty grain

Discussion in 'All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing' started by redleaves, Nov 11, 2012.

 

  1. #1
    redleaves

    Member

    Posted Nov 11, 2012
    I know purists will hate this idea but I really like to try odd new things. Anyone ever try to make a beer with all specialty malt? Like an all chocolate malt or roasted malt. I know it will expensive of course but that's not a problem. It will also be very bold in flavor. Any thoughts? Any ideas about how much fermentable sugar will result?
     
  2. #2
    redleaves

    Member

    Posted Nov 11, 2012
    Never mind I got my answer, there is not enough diastic power, so what in the minimum amount of say pale malt I would need to get the proper conversion with chocolate malt.
     
  3. #3
    hypergolic

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Nov 11, 2012
    Those malts have zero diastatic power which is needed to convert the starch to sugar, you would have to add amylase for any chance of this working. I can't see this turning out well but go for it.
     
  4. #4
    BigEd

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Nov 11, 2012
    There is nothing in chocolate malt to convert. Base malts and starchy adjuncts require enzymes to convert their starches to sugars. Experimentation is great but it needs to stay within reality.
     
  5. #5
    Ladd

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Nov 12, 2012
    If you want a minimum of base malt I would use 6 row because of it's higher diastolic power. Try something like 2lbs of it per 5lbs of specialty grain. Love to hear how it turns out!
     
  6. #6
    Denny

    Well-Known Member  

    Posted Nov 12, 2012
    These days, the diastatic power of 2 row is pretty much equal to 6 row.
     
  7. #7
    sudbuster

    This ain't my first rodeo....  

    Posted Nov 12, 2012
    ^^ True. And you won't have to deal with the extra protein.
     
  8. #8
    helibrewer

    Well-Known Member

    Posted Nov 12, 2012
    Yep, 140L vs 160L, close enough for me
     
  9. #9
    redleaves

    Member

    Posted Nov 14, 2012
    Thanks for the info, when I make it ill post results!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder