Unpasteurized Beer in the New York Times?? - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Beer Discussion > Unpasteurized Beer in the New York Times??

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-06-2009, 05:08 PM   #1
wendelgee2
Recipes 
 
Dec 2008
New York, NY
Posts: 324
Liked 3 Times on 2 Posts



Hey everybody,
This article in the Times the other day had me scratching my head:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/di...r=1&ref=dining

It talks about "Abbaye de Saint Bon-Chien, an unfiltered, unpasteurized, limited-edition ale brewed by Brasserie des Franches-Montagnes in Switzerland."

Does anyone know this beer? If so, how the heck can it be "unpasteurized"? Isn't the entire brewing process pasteurization? If you do ferment an unboiled wort (which would ultimately result in a sour beer, if I'm not mistaken), how do you get any bitterness into the beer? Wouldn't this be a ridiculously cloying 0 IBU brew?? Is there something about the "bugs" in an unpasteurized wort or in what they pitch that would make this drinkable?

I'm so confused.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:27 PM   #2
svraines
Recipes 
 
Feb 2008
Madison, WI
Posts: 63
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


It is not pasteurized AFTER fermentation, meaning it has live yeast (and whatever else) when it was bottled.
__________________
Fermenting: Traditional Bock, Belgian Dark Strong
Conditioning: Munich Dunkel, Belgian Amber
Drinking: Baltic Porter, O-fest, Drought Stout, English Summer Ale


 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:44 PM   #3
Loweface
 
Loweface's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2007
Limerick, Ireland
Posts: 1,037
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts


Yup, all your beer is unpasteurized, while most commercial beers are, and filtered aswell...

FWIW the killing of any microorganisms in the boil would be a form of sterilization not pasteurization which doesn't use quite as much heat.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Me
In the process of buying a bar... One drink at a time...
Quote:
Originally Posted by chortly View Post
...homebrew contains more satisfactrons per serving, so you don't have to drink as much as you would a commercial beer to get to your satisfactron saturation.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:48 PM   #4
wendelgee2
Recipes 
 
Dec 2008
New York, NY
Posts: 324
Liked 3 Times on 2 Posts


Ahhhhhh.
I get it.
So it's just a bassackwards way of saying "bottle conditioned."

Thanks.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:52 PM   #5
Revvy
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Revvy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2007
"Detroitish" Michigan
Posts: 40,921
Liked 3198 Times on 1886 Posts


No it's the "au naturele" yuppified, politically correct organic granola eating sounding way of saying "bottle conditioned."


Kinda like a Palmetto Bug is just a hoiti toiti West Palm Beach way of saying cockroach.

__________________
Like my snazzy new avatar? Get Sons of Zymurgy swag, here, and brew with the best.

Revvy's one of the cool reverends. He has a Harley and a t-shirt that says on the back "If you can read this, the bitch was Raptured. - Madman

I gotta tell ya, just between us girls, that Revvy is HOT. Very tall, gorgeous grey hair and a terrific smile. He's very good looking in person, with a charismatic personality... he drives like a ****ing maniac! - YooperBrew

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New York Times Article Hammy71 General Beer Discussion 9 10-30-2009 06:58 PM
New York Times beer tasting review(bitters) niquejim Commercial Brew Discussion 1 06-04-2008 04:38 PM
New York Times- More or Less Pale but All Belgian Glibbidy General Beer Discussion 8 08-28-2007 03:23 PM
New York Times Article ColoradoXJ13 General Beer Discussion 4 03-28-2007 11:54 PM


Forum Jump