secondary a must for big beers? - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > secondary a must for big beers?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-05-2009, 05:10 AM   #1
yeoldebrewer
Recipes 
 
Sep 2008
American Southwest
Posts: 447
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts



This topic has probably been done somewhere here before. So apologies for broaching it again, but I couldn't find it with "search"

I notice quite a few experienced brewers here don't secondary, but bottle directly from the primary. This is appealing on a number of levels.

But I'm wondering about making 'big' beers this way, such as barleywines or even IPAs with OGs of 1.08. Are secondaries necessary for higher gravity beers?
__________________
My airlock passes gas.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 07:12 AM   #2
Flattop
Recipes 
 
Dec 2008
Melbourne Australia
Posts: 124
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


Why??
High gravity beers ferment the same way...

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 07:26 AM   #3
Jaybird
Sponsor
HBT_SPONSOR.png
 
Jaybird's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2006
Nor*Cal
Posts: 7,474
Liked 943 Times on 666 Posts


I think so... But I keg everything.
__________________
Need a False Bottom for your Keg, Kettle or Cooler?

I have been making custom False Bottoms for just about everything since 2008

Nor Cal Brewing Solutions, Reddings local homebrew store
(530)243-BEER and (530)221-WINE


Still have questions PM me here or hit the website.

http://www.norcalbrewingsolutions.com and like us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/NorCalBrewingSolutionsfor Facebook only promos too
Smoke Cigars? www.stogietoys.com

*Member: The HBT Sweaty Fat Guy Cigar Club

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 07:43 AM   #4
ifishsum
Recipes 
 
Aug 2008
Portland OR
Posts: 1,447
Liked 9 Times on 8 Posts


The main reason I think that a secondary would be more important for such brews is that they typically benefit from a long bulk aging - long enough that yeast autolysis could be an issue. Also in the case of an IPA the secondary facilitates dry-hopping.
__________________
"If you're gonna be an ape, be a hairy one" - Spyder

Primary 2: Edwort's Robust Porter
Secondary 1: LW Pale Ale
Secondary 1: Blackened Soul RIS
Kegged: Dead Guy Ale
Kegged: Rye Pale Ale
Kegged: Haus Pale Ale
Kegged: Nut Brown Ale
Kegged: Afrikan Amber
Kegged: Jock Scott Ale
Kegged: Afrikan Amber

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 09:06 AM   #5
Brewsmith
 
Brewsmith's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Aug 2005
Torrance, CA
Posts: 6,252
Liked 62 Times on 58 Posts


Autolysis is not a problem. You would be hard pressed to find a brewer on this board to say that they legitimately had autolysis from leaving a primary too long. For a big beer, you can leave the primary for 4-6 weeks with no problem. By that time fermentation is done, the beer is clear and it's ready to bottle or keg.
__________________
Fermenting:#160 Apollo/Calypso Pale Ale
Kegged:#153 Old Helicon Barleywine 2013, #157 Irish Red, #158 Mosaic IPA, #159 Bravo/Delta ESB
Up Next:Brown Porter, American Stout, Imperial Stout
My Recipes
Tuba Sonata

Smith & Co. Custom Tap Handles

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 12:44 PM   #6
pete1505
Recipes 
 
Jan 2009
Posts: 6

I'm new so forgive me.....but if everyone leaves all beers in the primary and then straight to keg or bottles, what's the point of a secondary? Does it have any uses?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 12:54 PM   #7
Yooper
Ale's What Cures You!
HBT_ADMIN.png
 
Yooper's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2006
UP of Michigan, Winter Texan
Posts: 69,201
Liked 7704 Times on 5413 Posts


Sure it does! Some people still always use a secondary, and I often do if I'm bottling a beer (not kegging). The secondary tank allows the beer to clear up quite a bit and condition. You can wait until fermentation is finished, then rack to a carboy and store it as long as you'd like.

I use secondaries for dryhopping, and for lagering. All of my lagers are racked to the carboy and lagered for 8-12 weeks before kegging.

It's a matter of personal preference. Some always use a secondary, some never do, and some of us use one if we feel that the beer can benefit from the extra time.

For a big beer, I'd probably use a secondary, if for no other reason than to keep me from drinking it way to soon!
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 01:19 PM   #8
Panzermann
Recipes 
 
Dec 2008
In a bowl of Hops
Posts: 302
Liked 6 Times on 5 Posts


I have been racking to secondary with all my brews before bottling. So far so good.
__________________
folgen Sie die Reinheitsgebot oder die Deutschen reinheit gesetz?


***No longer have time to keep up with all my batches***


Quote:
Originally Posted by Revvy View Post
I would love to find a loooong oldschool baster though, mine is a little short

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 03:43 PM   #9
RedIrocZ-28
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
RedIrocZ-28's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2008
Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 845
Liked 29 Times on 22 Posts


I have used a secondary only once on my 4 brews so far. The only reason I did was because I was doing a Vanilla Porter (that turned out to be a porter with not even a hint of vanilla.... ) where you let it sit on the adjunct for a few weeks after primary to try to impart the flavor to the beer.

Otherwise, I don't think I would even use my secondary, unless I got brave enough to try to make some Apfelwein.
__________________
I'm Back!!!

Trying to accumulate more Budweiser American Ale bottles than Revvy... 1 six pack at a time.

My DIY Immersion Chiller <------ Click Me :)

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 11:17 PM   #10
Flattop
Recipes 
 
Dec 2008
Melbourne Australia
Posts: 124
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


Most people i know rack, i rarely rack, a lot of people rack to dry hop but there doesn't seem to be a reason not to dry hop in the primary. Adding fruit etc seems to be a good reason to rack, yeast harvesting is another good reason. In the end with racking you double the chance of infection (which is not a high chance anyhow). My local HBS recommends against racking, he says that all the science is against it now. I have not seen the science so i reckon do what suits the brew. If it's a basic beer and you are not adding anything there is no reason to rack at all. Clarity come in the primary or secondary with time.
Oh, one more reason is that some people rack onto gelatin as it acts as a fining agent. I have done this and seen no difference in clarity than using other finings and in fact my brews without finings are probably just as good and clear.

 
Reply With Quote


Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fermentation - Lighter beers versus darker beers BrianBrewsSomeBeers Fermentation & Yeast 1 11-04-2009 10:34 PM
Sergio's World Beers - Over 1000 beers - Opening in Louisville, KY KYB South East Homebrew Forum 18 08-13-2009 07:37 PM
Fruit beers - Add in Boil, Primary, or Secondary? HpN44 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 2 04-07-2009 12:41 AM
Beers that need a long secondary? Bigsnake Recipes/Ingredients 13 11-14-2008 09:02 PM
Big Beers - longer in primary/secondary? Kiwi_Jonno Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 22 07-15-2008 12:56 AM


Forum Jump