Is a starter necessary? - Page 2 - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > Is a starter necessary?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-18-2008, 12:46 PM   #11
Jonnio
 
Jonnio's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2007
Posts: 1,509
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts


I don't always pitch a starter on small beers, but I think Yuri's recent post said the advantages best - Pitching a large starter into properly temperature controlled wort can keep any off flavors from being produced. This will allow your beer to be drinkable much faster.

Your other option is time, let it sit longer in the fermenter, and condition longer in the bottle/keg and you can achieve the same results. (Until you get to a high ABV beer, then you have to do starters or double pitch)


__________________
------------------------------------------------
Official member of HBAMAP (Home Brewers Against Murder and Pedophilia)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revvy View Post
Then that means dumping your beer because you think it's bad is tantamount to abortion! And as Big Kahuna says, drinking a beer too soon is tatamount to beer pedophilia...

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 07:34 PM   #12
Tripod
Recipes 
 
Sep 2008
Atlanta, GA
Posts: 642
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNQ3X View Post
I'm a little too OCD for that! If you don't want or are ill-equipped to make starters, don't despair! Just keep pitching as best you can. Oh, and make good beer...
I'm with you on that. I know I don't HAVE to go with a starter but I figure that the more varables I make an effort to control means less variables are left to chance. Even the ones that probably don't need my control.

At least by making a starter I don't have to worry about whether my yeast is good. One less thing to think about = one more homebrew to relax and enjoy...

-Tripod


__________________
No trees were harmed in the posting of this message but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced...

Primary: First AG Batch! - Irish Red | Bottle: Oatmeal Stout| Drinking: Nearcastle II... | Up Next: It may be time to try a lager

5/2012

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 09:18 PM   #13
Malticulous
Recipes 
 
Aug 2008
St. George Utah
Posts: 4,143
Liked 72 Times on 57 Posts


You could just look at it as a five gallon starter, lol.

I'd just use dry yeast unless there is a need something more specific. I have only used liquid yeast once and I made a starter the way How to Brew says too do it. I probably was still under pitching and it took several hours longer to start bubbling than any of my other brews. I have some hefeweizen yeast coming and I want to do 10 gallons with it so I will use a larger starter.
__________________
Everything is better with a beer.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 08:11 AM   #14
yeoldebrewer
Recipes 
 
Sep 2008
American Southwest
Posts: 447
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts


Can a lazy-A brewer like myself compensate with a high OG brew by simply re-hydrating and pitching twice as much dry yeast?
__________________
My airlock passes gas.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 09:51 AM   #15
scinerd3000
Recipes 
 
Mar 2008
Milton, De
Posts: 2,127
Liked 11 Times on 11 Posts


dont be lazy...but yes....good beer comes about with patience and planning. And always a bit of luck and a starter helps the odds.
__________________
On Hiatus: Brewing at work....

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 11:29 AM   #16
Jonnio
 
Jonnio's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2007
Posts: 1,509
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by yeoldebrewer View Post
Can a lazy-A brewer like myself compensate with a high OG brew by simply re-hydrating and pitching twice as much dry yeast?
Yes - that is actually the correct way to pitch higher counts of dry yeast. I have read that its a bad idea to make dry yeast starters and that if you need more yeast just toss in 2 packs.
__________________
------------------------------------------------
Official member of HBAMAP (Home Brewers Against Murder and Pedophilia)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revvy View Post
Then that means dumping your beer because you think it's bad is tantamount to abortion! And as Big Kahuna says, drinking a beer too soon is tatamount to beer pedophilia...

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 07:56 PM   #17
Calvinfan1
Recipes 
 
Jan 2008
Oklahoma City
Posts: 63


Quote:
Originally Posted by emoutal View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that a pack of dry yeast has way more cells than liquid yeast. A starter is not normally used with dry yeast for this reason.
Not when it comes to live, functional cells. I counted them myself on multiple samples.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 09:59 PM   #18
Pelikan
Recipes 
 
Oct 2008
Q Continuum
Posts: 899
Liked 11 Times on 10 Posts


Regarding the Wyeast Activator slap-packs: When you slap it and "activate" the bag, will the numbers of yeast increase from the stock level (assuming you let it sit for a few hours)?

I just brewed up my first batch last night, and used the Wyeast. Slapped the pack and let it roll for 12 hours before I pitched it (looked like it was going to explode at that point). My question is, the Oatmeal Stout I'm brewing has a listed initial gravity of 1.062. Was this single Activator grossly inadequate? Did the 12 hour activation time negate that somewhat?
__________________
Back to brewing! It's been too long!!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 10:05 PM   #19
Yooper
Ale's What Cures You!
HBT_ADMIN.png
 
Yooper's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2006
UP of Michigan, Winter Texan
Posts: 69,042
Liked 7616 Times on 5360 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Pelikan View Post
Regarding the Wyeast Activator slap-packs: When you slap it and "activate" the bag, will the numbers of yeast increase from the stock level (assuming you let it sit for a few hours)?

I just brewed up my first batch last night, and used the Wyeast. Slapped the pack and let it roll for 12 hours before I pitched it (looked like it was going to explode at that point). My question is, the Oatmeal Stout I'm brewing has a listed initial gravity of 1.062. Was this single Activator grossly inadequate? Did the 12 hour activation time negate that somewhat?
The smack packs with the activator show activity, but don't increase cell count, from what I understand. Check out this site: Mr Malty Pitching Rate Calculator to see what kind of cell count you should have.

For ANY beer over 1.045 (maybe smaller) I'd use a starter, unless that yeast was so fresh it was made yesterday.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 10:07 PM   #20
Pelikan
Recipes 
 
Oct 2008
Q Continuum
Posts: 899
Liked 11 Times on 10 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by YooperBrew View Post
The smack packs with the activator show activity, but don't increase cell count, from what I understand. Check out this site: Mr Malty Pitching Rate Calculator to see what kind of cell count you should have.

For ANY beer over 1.045 (maybe smaller) I'd use a starter, unless that yeast was so fresh it was made yesterday.
The yeast was actually extremely fresh, the born on date was something like a week ago. Regardless, it's too late for me to do a starter culture, the deed has been done. Did I screw the pooch on this one? It's only been 12 hours and I have constant bubbling from the airlock (first saw activity at about 4 hours, first notable bubbles at 8), but I don't know if that's necessarily an indicator of A-Okay status.


__________________
Back to brewing! It's been too long!!


 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brett starter or no starter squeekysheep General Techniques 4 07-31-2009 02:54 AM
starter slomo Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 6 04-27-2009 07:09 PM
Starter Question / Will 1/2 gal of starter do two batches? JKHomebrew General Beer Discussion 4 01-28-2009 01:39 PM
How big of a starter? Eskimo Spy Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 2 08-14-2008 07:08 PM
Starter? We don't need no stinkin' starter! Hopsnort General Techniques 11 02-13-2006 08:14 AM


Forum Jump