Whirlpool - The big How-To - Page 3 - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Techniques > Whirlpool - The big How-To

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-28-2006, 11:34 PM   #21
boo boo
Recipes 
 
Jun 2005
Hearts's Delight, Newfoundland
Posts: 4,165
Liked 35 Times on 30 Posts


For some reason I don't get that big of a cone when I whirpool. I have about 3 inches of break material on the bottom of my kettle. Thanks for the heads up on saving/straining the leftover wort for later use. Always seemed a waste to me to throw it down the drain. I can freeze it to be used for future starters if I boil it before using it in a starter.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 02:49 AM   #22
Baron von BeeGee
Beer Bully
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Baron von BeeGee's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2005
Barony of Fuquay-Varina, NC
Posts: 5,397
Liked 23 Times on 22 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
For some reason I don't get that big of a cone when I whirpool. I have about 3 inches of break material on the bottom of my kettle.
I had complained privately to the Kaiser of the same phenomenon. I would get a good mound when whirlpooling hot wort, but not cold. However, my last batch I whirlpooled cold and started watching a movie and forgot about it for about 35 minutes. When I siphoned I had a great mound (heh heh). I think I was rushing the process with cooled wort...it really takes a while for the whirlpool action to cease leaving a nice mound.

wtgarrett Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 05:05 AM   #23
Walker
I use secondaries. :p
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Walker's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2005
Cary, NC
Posts: 10,987
Liked 101 Times on 89 Posts


I admit that I don't wait long enough, but with everything that you read that stresses cooling the wort down as quickly as possible and pitching the yeast immediately thereafter, I have a hard time walking away for more than 10 or 15 minutes.

-walker

PS: nice write-up, Kai.
__________________
Ground Fault Brewing Co.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 02:49 PM   #24
Kaiser
 
Kaiser's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2005
Pepperell, MA
Posts: 3,895
Liked 129 Times on 75 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperial Walker
I admit that I don't wait long enough, but with everything that you read that stresses cooling the wort down as quickly as possible and pitching the yeast immediately thereafter, I have a hard time walking away for more than 10 or 15 minutes.
Keep it covered and there should be no worry. Germs lack the abiliy to "crawl" under the lid or aluminum foil. They have to fall be drafted for carried in. You get way more potential contact with germs when you try to pour it through a strainer and funnel and have to unclogg the funnel many times. I have been there

Kai

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 04:49 PM   #25
BrewStef
 
BrewStef's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2006
Harpers Ferry, WV
Posts: 162

Kai,

Can you get a good whirlpool going if you have a kettle with a ball valve? How about if it also has a thermometer? Would the probe in the thermometer get too much in the way or would it disrupt the whirlpooling effect?

I am thinking about getting this: http://morebeer.com/product.html?product_id=15439

But I also want to be sure I can get a good whirlpool going.

Should I just RDWAHAHB?

Thanks.

Stefan

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 11:11 PM   #26
Kaiser
 
Kaiser's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2005
Pepperell, MA
Posts: 3,895
Liked 129 Times on 75 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by BrewStef
Kai,

Can you get a good whirlpool going if you have a kettle with a ball valve? How about if it also has a thermometer? Would the probe in the thermometer get too much in the way or would it disrupt the whirlpooling effect?
Sorry to say that "I don't know" I haven't updated my kettle yet. I plan to get a new one eventually and will install a ring that connects to the spigot so I can whirlpool. But I'm not sure about the thermometer. In the end you can always omit the thermometer since it is not that necessary on a boil-kettle .

Kai

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 06:00 AM   #27
BrewStef
 
BrewStef's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2006
Harpers Ferry, WV
Posts: 162

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiser
I plan to get a new one eventually and will install a ring that connects to the spigot so I can whirlpool.
Kai,

Thanks for the response, but why would a ring connecting to a spigot help the whirlpool?

Sorry if this is too much of a Noob question.

Happy Easter.

Stefan

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 12:39 AM   #28
Kaiser
 
Kaiser's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2005
Pepperell, MA
Posts: 3,895
Liked 129 Times on 75 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by BrewStef
Thanks for the response, but why would a ring connecting to a spigot help the whirlpool?
This is not to much of a noob question, actually.

In order to make for a smooth wort rotation, w/o many turbulences, you have to make sure that there is nothing sticking into the wort. Either a spigot that is flush to the inside of the pot or a ring that goes around the pot should work. The ring has the advantage that the wort can enter it at many places around the trub cone, thus reducing the draft (and with this potential trub intake) that can build up at a single point.

But I haven't really looked into designing something like this. These are only thoughts I have about a potential design of a new brew-pot based on what I have seen and read so far.

Kai

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 01:57 AM   #29
BrewStef
 
BrewStef's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2006
Harpers Ferry, WV
Posts: 162

Thanks for the info. I think I will just stick with a basic full-boil pot and siphon it the old fasioned way. I really like the idea of doing everything possible to make the process easier and more consistent, and don't mind spending a little money (no brewsculptures are in my near future though) but sometimes simplest is best.

Cheers,

Stefan

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 02:08 AM   #30
Kaiser
 
Kaiser's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2005
Pepperell, MA
Posts: 3,895
Liked 129 Times on 75 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by BrewStef
I really like the idea of doing everything possible to make the process easier and more consistent, and don't mind spending a little money (no brewsculptures are in my near future though) but sometimes simplest is best.
I'm not crazy about updating my brewhouse either, just yet. Except for the boil overs, that I have to watch with a 25qt pot, I'm doing pretty well. Although that can get rather frustrating

I'm actually more interested in fixing the fermentation end of things first. That's where the beer will spend most of it's time anyway.

Kai

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Whirlpool? Grimsawyer General Techniques 20 10-12-2016 04:21 PM
How many whirlpool? WBC All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 23 09-23-2011 02:06 PM
For those of you that whirlpool in keggles... illinibrew04 General Techniques 4 09-09-2009 02:08 PM
Can I whirlpool w/ this...... Dog House Brew Equipment/Sanitation 3 08-31-2009 02:17 PM
Can you truely whirlpool with an 809 Denny's Evil Concoctions DIY Projects 5 03-23-2009 03:45 AM


Forum Jump