Water Chemical Makeup vs. PH - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Water Chemical Makeup vs. PH

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-07-2008, 08:35 PM   #1
JVD_X
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
JVD_X's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2008
Gainesville, Virginia
Posts: 1,478
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts



Hi Folks,

I was wondering if someone could explain to me if water chemistry is important in any way if I am already using Five Stars' 5.2 PH stabilizer? (Except chlorides of course)

At first I was thinking that by just setting the PH to about 5.2 that I would get great accuracy for any chosen beer style; however, according to Papazian (I went back and re-read his joy title nth time but this time paid attention to water) the free chemicals interact with mash in certain ways that - even with the PH was held at 5.2 - would not allow me to brew an exact style based on the mineral content of my household water.

I know this is being anal but I am curious if the the only benefit of the PH stabilizer is to increase yield.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 09:36 PM   #2
Dr_Deathweed
 
Dr_Deathweed's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2007
Bryan, Texas
Posts: 2,381
Liked 46 Times on 40 Posts


Some in the solutes in your water are more nutrients for the yeast than they are for the mash. 5.2 is more to stabilize your pH than to add minerals to your water. As far as brewing different styles, stabilizing the pH will help A LOT, but what is already in your water (Ca, HCO3, Mg, etc.) will have an impact as well.


If you get a water report from your water supply and post it here, we may be able to give yo a bit more information.
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence." - Napoleon Bonaparte
“An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools.” - Ernest Hemingway

Fermentation CabinetAdding Faucets to a TowerDIY HopbackPortable Kegerator

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 12:03 AM   #3
JVD_X
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
JVD_X's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2008
Gainesville, Virginia
Posts: 1,478
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts


Thanks,

I have actually contacted quality control for my water company and had an extensive discussion with the guy that produces the report. Our water actually comes from two different sources depending on availability - the Potomac River and a nearby lake. Each source has a different chemistry based on the little information I have. To make matters worse, the often blend the two waters for distribution, again depending on availability. Here is what the water compliance officer wrote:

Please pardon the delay. I have taken the last 3 years of data and provided result data is that is typical for your supply.
>
> The following is water quality information for the Bristow area. Please note your area had exclusively Potomac River water from Aug 15th -last week, due to the drought. We are slowly increasing Lake Manassas capacity. It is likely you are receiving a blend, which should become a Lake Manassas only supply by next week. We can make some field assessments at your location to determine where you stand during this transition.
>
>
> Lake Manassas Potomac River
>
> pH: 7.2-7.6 7.5
> Below are in parts per million (=mg/l)
>
> Free Cholrine: 0.75-2.0 2.0-2.5 (May-June only)
> Chloramine: None 2.0-3.5
> Orthophosphate: 0.5-0.75 ~1.0
> Bicarbonate: 30-40 60-80
> Total Hardness: 50-60 60-150 (harder in the winter)
> Sulfate: 25-40 18-30
> Sodium: 25 10-15
> Chloride: 20 15-25
Calcium: - 25-45

> Unfortunately (in the brewing sense), as the Lake supply returns your water will transition from moderate-very hard to a neutral rating. If there are other parameters needed please feel free to contact me.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 02:43 AM   #4
ajf
Senior Member
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
ajf's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2005
Long Island
Posts: 4,646
Liked 105 Times on 99 Posts


I'm no expert, but as I understand it, the concentration of calcium ions can have a substantial affect in the mash, and the concentration of sulphate ions substantially affects the hop profile.
Since I switched to AG, I've always added gypsum to my water to make up what I consider calcium and sulphate deficiencies,
Recently, I found my mahs pH was a little bit low, but instead of resorting to pH 5.2, I added a touch of calcium carnonate which corrected the problem.

-a.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 03:07 AM   #5
Dr_Deathweed
 
Dr_Deathweed's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2007
Bryan, Texas
Posts: 2,381
Liked 46 Times on 40 Posts


Just glancing at your profile, you seem to have some pretty good water. A little gypsum as ajf mentioned wouldn't hurt, but I would first find a program such as beer smith and play with the water profiles. It allows you to try and match your water profile against a target profile and adjust what additions that you need to get there. A free water profile tool is BreWater 3.0, it is very easy to use and free (both big pluses)


Personally, I am a HUGE proponent of 5.2, especially with lighter beers. I have a crappy water profile, and even with dilution and mineral additions, I still use a little 5.2 to cover my back. It would be great in your situation, because while you have a pretty decent profile, it can help remove alot of the worry about maintaining a steady pH in your mash, and allow you to play a little more with mineral additions.
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence." - Napoleon Bonaparte
“An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools.” - Ernest Hemingway

Fermentation CabinetAdding Faucets to a TowerDIY HopbackPortable Kegerator

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 01:08 PM   #6
TexLaw
Here's Lookin' Atcha!
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
TexLaw's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2007
Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,672
Liked 27 Times on 26 Posts


I don't know if you can just throw 5.2 into the mash and forget about everything else. However, as Deathweed said, you have some pretty good looking water to begin with.

Water chemistry also plays into the flavor of the beer.


TL
__________________
Beer is good for anything from hot dogs to heartache.

Drinking Frog Brewery, est. 1993

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 03:43 PM   #7
pjj2ba
Look under the recliner
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
pjj2ba's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2006
State College, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,382
Liked 205 Times on 167 Posts


Different water chemistrys are what gave rise to many of the styles we enjoy today. When the Bohemian lagers hit the scene, everyone wanted to emulate that style, but no one could because they didn't have the same water. So people experimented to find out what they had to do to make a pale crisp beer. People adapted their ingredients to match their waters. High carbonates, like that in Dublin, need some more acidic ingredients to bring the pH down. Hence their popularity of stouts. I have high carbonate water so I take steps to reduce that when I'm brewing light hoppy beers, other wise the bitterness is harsh and takes a long time to mellow.
__________________
On Tap: Doppelbock O'fest, Pale Ale, cider
Kegged and Aging/Lagering: CAP, Ger. Pils, OKZ (std Amer. lager), CZ Pils, Amer. Wheat, Rye IPA, Saison
Secondary:
Primary: Ger Pils, CAP
Brewing soon: Pale lager, Amer. wheat
Recently kicked : (
Pilsner Urquell Master Homebrewer
(1st NYC 2011, 2nd NYC 2012)
P U crowns winners in its inaugural master HB competition

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 06:47 PM   #8
Dr_Deathweed
 
Dr_Deathweed's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2007
Bryan, Texas
Posts: 2,381
Liked 46 Times on 40 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by TexLaw
I don't know if you can just throw 5.2 into the mash and forget about everything else. However, as Deathweed said, you have some pretty good looking water to begin with.

Water chemistry also plays into the flavor of the beer.


TL
You are absolutely right. You can't just forget about everything else with 5.2, sorry if I implied that. I meant more I love it because its buffering capacity can help keep your pH in the right range and avoid off flavors associated with tannin extractions, etc. Because of that I can worry a bit less about pH and focus more on basic brewing steps (temperature, mash times, sparging, etc.) and have to worry a little less than water quality.
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence." - Napoleon Bonaparte
“An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools.” - Ernest Hemingway

Fermentation CabinetAdding Faucets to a TowerDIY HopbackPortable Kegerator

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 07:54 PM   #9
TexLaw
Here's Lookin' Atcha!
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
TexLaw's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2007
Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,672
Liked 27 Times on 26 Posts


I agree with that completely, and I don't think you implied otherwise. I was more typing what I was thinking, rather than replying directly to anything you said.


TL
__________________
Beer is good for anything from hot dogs to heartache.

Drinking Frog Brewery, est. 1993

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 08:34 PM   #10
BBboomer
Recipes 
 
Oct 2006
Okie City
Posts: 34

One thing I see in your report you do need to address is the chlorine.
You need to filter your water through a charcoal filter to take care of that, then it looks like you are good to go with just about anything you want to brew.
I highly recommend a software program like ProMash to help you with water formulations for a specific beer type. You can adjust the chemical composition to match or nearly match nearly any type.

 
Reply With Quote


Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sanstar chemical name thatsme Equipment/Sanitation 1 10-03-2009 11:50 AM
Alpha Acid Chemical Makeup Parker36 Brew Science 7 03-11-2009 02:28 AM
Chemical Blonde Nerro Label Display & Discussion 12 02-05-2009 02:23 PM
chemical reaction kontreren Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 8 11-17-2008 02:31 PM
chemical taste simonj All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 12 03-23-2006 10:52 PM


Forum Jump