Sparge volume vs. Efficiency - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Sparge volume vs. Efficiency

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-07-2008, 04:02 PM   #1
PseudoChef
 
PseudoChef's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Apr 2007
West Chicago 'Burbs, IL
Posts: 3,406
Liked 110 Times on 81 Posts



For the last 4 batches I've brewed, I have finally kept my equipment constant and it's really allowed me to dial in my process where it's repeatable, expected, and turning out beer that I enjoy. It also obviously makes for a smoother process, and I've enjoyed my brew days immensely more because of that (somewhat...I'll get to this later).

Now, with this said, I think I do everything right. I am a cooler MLT guy (48 qt Ice Cube) who does the double batch sparge method. Now, the way I have read is that you base everything off your boil-off volume: If you, say boil off 1 gallon per hour (just for the sake of sayin'), then you would want to start off with 6.5 gallons of wort to get to 5.5 gallons into the fermentor.

Now, I've been on a belgian kick lately, and thus I'm flying with a strict Pils base, so 90 minute boils for DMS reasons. I've calculated my boil-off to be around 16% an hour, and this is a value I have now dialed in repeatedly. Taking that into account I start with around 7.25 gallons pre boil.

This is where I get lost: I will sparge to this amount, and at the end of the sparge, I can still pull 1.040 wort most every session. I dial in my efficiency with my LHBS crush to around 67% as I usually do bigger than average beers. But this has happened mostly every time.

For the 888 I was pulling 1.040 wort until I was left with 11 gallons that I boiled down to 5.5. For my last brew day, a partigyle, I ended up (post-boil) with the small beer being 1.045 but I still pulled about a gallon of 1.040ish wort that I then canned for starters in the future. I didn't see how much volume it would have taken me to get down to 1.010 because I just wanted to start the boil.

So what's the true measure of efficiency? I could theoretically get 80-85% if I wanted to boil all day, but we all know we don't want to do that. But if I stick to my boil volume that I want, I'm around 65-67%.

Maybe a little long winded, but it's Friday morning and I have nothing better to do.

What say yous?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 06:17 PM   #2
jayhoz
Recipes 
 
Jan 2007
Posts: 154

A little more info might get the discussion kicked off. What was your water to grain ratio, mash temp, sparge volume, sparge water temp, gravity of your first runnings, etc?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 06:24 PM   #3
PseudoChef
 
PseudoChef's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Apr 2007
West Chicago 'Burbs, IL
Posts: 3,406
Liked 110 Times on 81 Posts


I regularly use 1.25qts/lb for the water to grain ratio. Most of the Belgians I mash at 152° and other styles I tend to mash at 154°. I usually don't have trouble hitting my mash temps.

My sparge volume will be the volume necessary to reach that pre-boil volume. I'll divide it in half and add two additions: dump one in, stir, vorlauf until clear, drain. Then repeat with the second half.

I haven't measured the gravity of my first runnings. I'll do that next brew.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 07:22 PM   #4
conpewter
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
conpewter's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2007
East Dundee, Illinois
Posts: 5,109
Liked 53 Times on 48 Posts


Do you have a lot of dead space in your MLT so that after you drain the initial runnings there may still be a lot of high gravity sweet wort below your pickup?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 07:28 PM   #5
Bobby_M
Vendor and Brewer
HBT_SPONSOR.png
 
Bobby_M's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Aug 2006
Whitehouse Station, NJ
Posts: 23,333
Liked 1765 Times on 1122 Posts


Wait.. just to make sure. You are running off the mash prior to adding any sparge right? It doesn't sound right to me. My third runnings (after the second sparge infusion) typically reads 1.020 or lower based on a typical finished 1.050 or so beer. Surely a higher gravity beer will have a somewhat higher last runoff while you remain in reasonable preboil volume.

You make a good point though, anyone could hit 99% efficiency if they boil for 4 hours. I quote my efficiency numbers in the context of 70 minute boils and therefore limit the preboil volume to 12.5 for 11 gallon batches.
__________________
Welcome to BrewHardware.com. I love you.
New Stirplates are IN!
Chugger Pumps, Pump Kits, Camlocks, Sightglasses, Clear USA made Silicone Tubing, RIMS, Electric Install Parts, etc.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 07:38 PM   #6
Ryanh1801
 
Ryanh1801's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2007
Addison,TX
Posts: 2,676
Liked 13 Times on 10 Posts


I always sparge with 1/2 gallon per pound of grain. On big beers it does take a lot of time to boil down, but I hit my numbers and thats whats important to me.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 08:07 PM   #7
PseudoChef
 
PseudoChef's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Apr 2007
West Chicago 'Burbs, IL
Posts: 3,406
Liked 110 Times on 81 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby_M
Wait.. just to make sure. You are running off the mash prior to adding any sparge right? It doesn't sound right to me. My third runnings (after the second sparge infusion) typically reads 1.020 or lower based on a typical finished 1.050 or so beer. Surely a higher gravity beer will have a somewhat higher last runoff while you remain in reasonable preboil volume.

You make a good point though, anyone could hit 99% efficiency if they boil for 4 hours. I quote my efficiency numbers in the context of 70 minute boils and therefore limit the preboil volume to 12.5 for 11 gallon batches.
Yes, I lauter before I sparge.

It doesn't sound right, that's why I'm asking. I could very well be the dead space, I don't really know how to calculate this...but I don't know.


Either way, if I'm at a terrible efficiency, I can just elect to boil down more or if I'm where I want to be, I have more starter wort.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 08:09 PM   #8
Bobby_M
Vendor and Brewer
HBT_SPONSOR.png
 
Bobby_M's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Aug 2006
Whitehouse Station, NJ
Posts: 23,333
Liked 1765 Times on 1122 Posts


The way to test deadspace is fill up the tun with water until it's just over your spigot. Then drain it. See how much gets left in the tun when it's stops draining.
__________________
Welcome to BrewHardware.com. I love you.
New Stirplates are IN!
Chugger Pumps, Pump Kits, Camlocks, Sightglasses, Clear USA made Silicone Tubing, RIMS, Electric Install Parts, etc.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 08:24 PM   #9
sause
Steel Comma Ale & Lagery
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
sause's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2004
Menomonee Falls WI
Posts: 1,866
Liked 18 Times on 13 Posts


When you fill up the MLT with your sparge water is the water reaching the top of the grain? I only do one sparge because of this and hit pretty good eff. numbers. Just to get this out there comma you are stirring the mash after the sparge water right?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brewer
Had some Bud Light analyzed once. They told me my dog had diabetes... And was pregnant

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 08:33 PM   #10
PseudoChef
 
PseudoChef's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Apr 2007
West Chicago 'Burbs, IL
Posts: 3,406
Liked 110 Times on 81 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by sause
When you fill up the MLT with your sparge water is the water reaching the top of the grain? I only do one sparge because of this and hit pretty good eff. numbers. Just to get this out there comma you are stirring the mash after the sparge water right?
I stir, but maybe not well enough. I need a paddle.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
N.M.O.D.B.S. Sparge volume bdnoona General Beer Discussion 6 05-22-2009 08:02 PM
Sparge water volume help HoppyDaze All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 11 02-27-2009 06:29 PM
Sparge volume too big for LT Cos All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 26 09-14-2007 12:49 PM
Sparge Water Volume jayhoz General Techniques 5 05-02-2007 12:57 AM
Sparge Volume and Temp jcarson83 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 6 07-04-2006 04:21 PM


Forum Jump