Thick Mash vs Thin Mash - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Thick Mash vs Thin Mash

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-25-2008, 09:09 AM   #1
Drunkagain
Recipes 
 
May 2007
Pacific Northwest
Posts: 107


Is there any benefit to having a thick or thin mash? I screwed up my math this morning when brewing and ended up with the thickest mash I've ever had. I'm just wondering if I could run into any problems because of that.
__________________
-JohnE

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 09:45 AM   #2
killian
Recipes 
 
Apr 2007
western/central new york
Posts: 1,500
Liked 14 Times on 14 Posts


how thick?
__________________
damn I gotta brew something

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 01:14 PM   #3
menschmaschine
 
menschmaschine's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2007
Delaware
Posts: 3,272
Liked 41 Times on 33 Posts


I don't have the book with me and I don't know the details off-hand, but Greg Noonan (New Brewing Lager Beer) speaks highly of thick mashes in certain situations. Down to 1:1, qt:lb. I can't imagine it will be a bad thing.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 04:01 PM   #4
Buford
 
Buford's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2006
Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,383
Liked 10 Times on 7 Posts


I do all my English-style pales with a thick mash (1 qt/lb). Thick mashes tend to produce more dextrins than a thin mash at the same temperature, so you get a fuller body in the finished product.
__________________
Flying Dutchman Unlimited Ale Works
Buy my crap!


FERMENTING: ---
KEGGED/IN STORAGE: ---
KEGGED/ON TAP: ---

DIY STUFF: Sanyo 4912 kegerator conversion

nickster51 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 04:13 PM   #5
Bobby_M
Vendor and Brewer
HBT_SPONSOR.png
 
Bobby_M's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Aug 2006
Whitehouse Station, NJ
Posts: 23,245
Liked 1695 Times on 1089 Posts


Thicker mashes also lead to higher efficiencies in some cases because it reserves more of the total volume for sparging. Of course, if you go too thick, you could have conversion problems which would negate the increase but I'm talking about a reasonable 1-1.25qt/lb which I always shoot for.
__________________
Welcome to BrewHardware.com. I love you.
Corny Keg Dry Hop Canisters $26.50 for limited time
Chugger Pumps, Pump Kits, Camlocks, Sightglasses, Clear USA made Silicone Tubing, RIMS, Electric Install Parts, etc.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 04:18 PM   #6
sleepystevenson
 
sleepystevenson's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2007
North Western PA
Posts: 435
Liked 13 Times on 7 Posts


I tend to do everything at 1 qt. per pound. It allows me to brew higher gravity beers with my current 12 gal. cooler mashtun than I would at a higher water/grain ratio.

For what it is worth, 1 qt. per pound is what Papazian recommends in the Complete Joy of Homebrewing....course the copyright on my copy is 1991.....so...

I know a lot of my homebrew buddies use the current standby of 1.25 qt. per pound, also with good results.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 10:02 PM   #7
Got Trub?
Recipes 
 
Apr 2007
Washington State
Posts: 1,538
Liked 9 Times on 7 Posts


As noted above it will affect your fermentability but to a much lesser extent then mash temperature.

GT

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 10:06 PM   #8
Brewsmith
 
Brewsmith's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Aug 2005
Torrance, CA
Posts: 6,252
Liked 62 Times on 58 Posts


I used to do almost all of my brews at a ratio of 1:1 qt/lb because of mash tun space. I even ran some bigger beers at 0.9 qt/lb just so it would fit. Now that I have a bigger mash tun I run 1.25 qts/lb on about anything. Assuming the mash had enough water in it to properly have the grain covered in water, I'd say you're fine.
__________________
Fermenting:#160 Apollo/Calypso Pale Ale
Kegged:#153 Old Helicon Barleywine 2013, #157 Irish Red, #158 Mosaic IPA, #159 Bravo/Delta ESB
Up Next:Brown Porter, American Stout, Imperial Stout
My Recipes
Tuba Sonata

Smith & Co. Custom Tap Handles

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 10:31 PM   #9
RLinNH
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
RLinNH's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Feb 2006
Wrentham, MA
Posts: 1,014
Liked 28 Times on 13 Posts


Same goes for me. All of my Mashing is done with the 1 qt per pound ratio.
__________________
You Can Give A Man A Fish and Feed Him For a Day, or You Can Teach Him To Fly Fish And Spoil Him For Life

On Deck Hmmmmmmm
Primary Super Sessionable III
Secondary
On TapAmerican Pale Ale

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 10:53 PM   #10
ajf
Senior Member
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
ajf's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2005
Long Island
Posts: 4,646
Liked 105 Times on 99 Posts


Another 1 qt per lb here.

I've never seen so many thick mashers all in one place.

GT. Do you have any proof that the mash thickness has much less affect that temperature on fermentability? I have no proof, but I believe the opposite is true, at least when comparing mashes using 1 qt vs 1.25 qt per lb.

-a.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
thick - thin mash question docmoran Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 3 04-09-2009 03:56 PM
Thick mash vs. thin mash? dsuarez All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 15 03-19-2009 06:54 PM
Thin Mash GrundleCruncher All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 10 09-09-2007 02:12 PM
HELP thin mash what to do?? poetic_entropy All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 3 04-18-2007 12:53 AM


Forum Jump