I don't think this is a problem...but maybe it is?!? - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > I don't think this is a problem...but maybe it is?!?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-25-2014, 10:05 AM   #1
Gameface
 
Gameface's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2010
Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,809
Liked 483 Times on 280 Posts



So, quick and dirty.

I use a 15G Blichmann kettle as a HLT. I typically use 6G of strike water that I add to a 10G Rubbermaid cooler, for 10G batches of beer. The sight gauge only reads down to 3G, so I start with 9G of water in my HLT.

Here's the part I'm sort of slightly wondering about. I sparge with about 9G of water. So, after I add my strike water I add 9G of water to my HLT, which brings my total volume to 12G. When I begin fly sparging I continue to add water to my MT until I hit my desired volume in my BK. Meaning, I add more water to my MT than I end up draining to my BK.

I can't imagine this is a problem but then as I read I see that most people seem to measure out their sparge water. While I add a certain amount, it's not measured to match my sparging needs, it is intentionally more than I need to sparge with. Once I reach my desired volume in the BK I shut the valve and proceed with my brew day.

This is a non-issue, right?

Just wanted to check.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 10:55 AM   #2
wilserbrewer
BIAB Expert Tailor
HBT_SPONSOR.png
 
wilserbrewer's Avatar
Recipes 
 
May 2007
Jersey Shore, Jersey
Posts: 9,430
Liked 1319 Times on 1011 Posts


Most likely a non issue, but sparging with a precise amount of water and fully draining the tun might gain you a slightly better efficiency. I like your method for ease of process and simply gauging the preboil volume is a great way to brew as opposed to attempting to predetermine water volumes.

It is likely a non issue IMO, and for possibly $0.20 worth of grain...if it ain't broke don't fix it....cheers!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 02:24 PM   #3
ChuckO
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
ChuckO's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2008
Keyrock, WV
Posts: 1,022
Liked 144 Times on 103 Posts


I agree with wilserbrewer, it doesn't make any difference. My only reason for measuring the sparge water is to make it easier to drain and clean the MLT. I calculate for about 1/2 gal. excess at the end of the sparge just in case there's a problem.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 02:40 PM   #4
RM-MN
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Nov 2010
Solway, MN
Posts: 9,406
Liked 1631 Times on 1296 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Gameface View Post
So, quick and dirty.

I use a 15G Blichmann kettle as a HLT. I typically use 6G of strike water that I add to a 10G Rubbermaid cooler, for 10G batches of beer. The sight gauge only reads down to 3G, so I start with 9G of water in my HLT.

Here's the part I'm sort of slightly wondering about. I sparge with about 9G of water. So, after I add my strike water I add 9G of water to my HLT, which brings my total volume to 12G. When I begin fly sparging I continue to add water to my MT until I hit my desired volume in my BK. Meaning, I add more water to my MT than I end up draining to my BK.

I can't imagine this is a problem but then as I read I see that most people seem to measure out their sparge water. While I add a certain amount, it's not measured to match my sparging needs, it is intentionally more than I need to sparge with. Once I reach my desired volume in the BK I shut the valve and proceed with my brew day.

This is a non-issue, right?

Just wanted to check.
For sparging you choose a method, batch or fly. You seem to have chosen fly so you keep adding water to the mash tun until you reach your volume. If you batch sparged, you can measure your first runnings and then add the amount needed for pre boil volume to the tun in a batch and once stirred well, you drain it all. Either way works, fly sparging is supposed to be slightly more efficient at leaching out the sugars but it also takes longer.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 06:18 PM   #5
kanzimonson
Recipes 
 
Aug 2009
Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,174
Liked 44 Times on 40 Posts


If you're happy with your efficiency then it's not an issue. I'd say the main reason to try to get a little closer to exact would be the amount of energy you're wasting in heating up the extra water. I calculate to have about 3-4 quarts of extra wort runoff, just in case. You sound experienced enough - the absorption rates are pretty consistent so it shouldn't be too hard to narrow in on something more precise.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 08:30 PM   #6
tootal
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
tootal's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2011
Collinsville, Illinois
Posts: 425
Liked 92 Times on 69 Posts


No worries! We don't even measure our mash water. We bring water in from the bottom and add malt as it rises. Once it's an inch or so over the grain bed we're good.

We start draining the mash into the kettle. As soon as we see the level drop we start pumping sparge water into the mash tun keeping the same level. This keeps the grain bed floating allowing the sparge water to rinse better. Once we hit our mark on the kettle we stop. We then drain the rest of the mash into a bucket while the kettle starts it's boil. Unless we're making a huge beer the wort at this point is tasteless. Our efficiency in the fermentor is at 86%.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 09:06 PM   #7
Croyzen
Recipes 
 
Feb 2014
Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 130
Liked 22 Times on 14 Posts


Do you use a refractometer? Are you reaching your expected pre-boil gravity with the kettle at pre-boil volume? Do you take a gravity reading of the fly sparge runnings before shutting the valve off? I'm guessing this is all done so the only thing I see as an issue would be...

I batch sparge so maybe I'm missing something. Is it a pain cleaning out the cooler with a bunch of water left behind? When I measure I'm just dealing with the wet grain for cleanup.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 09:32 PM   #8
Gameface
 
Gameface's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2010
Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,809
Liked 483 Times on 280 Posts


I agree, the biggest issue it seems is how much heavier my mash tun is with the extra water in it. I typically let it drain into a spare kettle.

I do check my pre-boil gravity. I sometimes but don't always check my runoff gravity.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 07:46 PM   #9
djfriesen
Recipes 
 
Sep 2011
Posts: 1,189
Liked 26 Times on 24 Posts


I'd be curious what the gravity of that final runoff would be: any chance it's high enough to use for starters? If so, no real reason you couldn't just put that spare kettle on the stove inside and make up some starter wort.

If not, depending on the volume and whether it's worth the effort, you could boil down to an appropriate starter gravity.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2014, 12:31 AM   #10
Gameface
 
Gameface's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2010
Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,809
Liked 483 Times on 280 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by djfriesen View Post
I'd be curious what the gravity of that final runoff would be: any chance it's high enough to use for starters? If so, no real reason you couldn't just put that spare kettle on the stove inside and make up some starter wort.

If not, depending on the volume and whether it's worth the effort, you could boil down to an appropriate starter gravity.
I like this idea. I'm going to check next brew day.

 
Reply With Quote


Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First Mead batch problem/no problem? Hosedaddy Mead Forum 10 04-17-2012 12:43 PM
Specific Gravity Problem/mixing problem drunkenfud Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 7 03-19-2012 02:23 AM
No-Heat Mead - Fermentation Problem or Methodology Problem? matts Mead Forum 12 09-15-2011 10:11 PM
I'm part of the problem... The leashed dog problem... TXCrash Drunken Ramblings and Mindless Mumbling 16 06-03-2010 02:51 AM


Forum Jump