London Ale Yeast= Danstar Windsor? - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Recipes/Ingredients > London Ale Yeast= Danstar Windsor?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-26-2007, 08:36 PM   #1
elkdog
Recipes 
 
May 2007
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Posts: 1,086
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts



I'm about to order ingredients for a porter, and want to use a dry yeast that is similar to a WLP013 london ale yeast (I'm cheap and lazy, and I don't want to make a starter if I can avoid it). Is Windsor a good approximation, or would Safale S-04 be better?


__________________
Revolving Door Brewery

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 10:04 PM   #2
Funkenjaeger
 
Funkenjaeger's Avatar
Recipes 
 
May 2007
Nashua, NH
Posts: 1,598
Liked 9 Times on 7 Posts


I have never used WLP013, so take my opinion with a grain of salt, but...

I used windsor yeast once and I was very disappointed with it. Very poor attenuation and flocculation. I wound up pitching S-04 on it to finish it off. It wound up much cloudier than I would have liked, and tasted weird. The taste could have been due to other factors, but regardless, I don't plan to use windsor again anytime soon.

Based on the description of WLP013 including the word "dry" and listing "medium" flocculation, I don't think windsor would really fit the bill. I'd go with S-04 if I were you. If you can get Nottingham, that'd likely be a good choice as well.




 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 10:12 PM   #3
Orfy
For the love of beer!
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Orfy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2005
Cheshire, England
Posts: 11,732
Liked 94 Times on 62 Posts


I'd go for Danstar everytime.
__________________
GET THE GOBLIN
Have a beer on me.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 05:23 PM   #4
derogg
Recipes 
 
Dec 2006
Aliso Viejo, Ca
Posts: 159
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


Reading on the Danstar web site , I would say go with Windsor. - Dirk
__________________
Bier frisch und gut, schafft frohen Mut.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 05:48 PM   #5
david_42
 
david_42's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2005
Willamina & Oak Grove, Oregon, USA
Posts: 25,593
Liked 151 Times on 142 Posts


Windsor is a good yeast for a porter. The lower attenuation means more body and a sweeter finish.
__________________
Remember one unassailable statistic, as explained by the late, great George Carlin: "Just think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of them are even stupider!"

"I would like to die on Mars, just not on impact." Elon Musk

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 06:08 AM   #6
FlyGuy
 
FlyGuy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2007
Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 3,605
Liked 178 Times on 51 Posts


London ale is one of my favourite yeasts. Personally though, I don't think either the Windsor or the S-04 are entirely substitutable. Both are fine yeasts, but the Windsor doesn't attenuate nearly as well as the WLP013/Wyeast1028, and I gave up on S-04 because I was having trouble with some off flavours (although admittedly, I may have been having some temperature problems).

If I had to chose between the two dry yeasts only, I would go with the Windsor hands down, and just recognize that I am going to get less attenuation and a sweeter beer, and adjust the brew accordingly.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 02:43 PM   #7
moger777
Recipes 
 
Oct 2007
Posts: 149
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


Can't speak for London yeast but I've used Windsor twice and both times I felt that the beer was too wet and had some strange off flavors. Granted thats not exactly a scientific evaluation for a yeast I don't plan on using it again.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 04:06 AM   #8
Madtown Brew
Recipes 
 
Jun 2007
Madison, WI
Posts: 258
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts


Dare I suggest that you get the liquid yeast and just don't make a starter?

Seriously, I've made plenty of brews with just one smackpack and no starter and they have turned out great. IMO, a starter is just a little extra insurance that things will turn out right (attenuation, esters, off-flavors). They wouldn't call it a "pitchable" yeast pack if it really wasn't.

I think you may be sacrificing more by going with dry yeast than just getting the liquid and not making a starter.
__________________
Fermenting:
rye farmhouse ale
Oktoberfest
flanders red
Kegged:
Oktoberfest

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 01:10 PM   #9
elkdog
Recipes 
 
May 2007
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Posts: 1,086
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts


Just to close the matter, I ended up using Windsor, and the beer is pretty darn sweet; too sweet for my liking. I suspect that the combination of Windsor and extract is leading to poor attenuation (about 66%) and overly sweet beer. Might try it again after I go AG. For now, I'll probably make a starter or pitch Nottingham for my next porter.
__________________
Revolving Door Brewery

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 01:39 PM   #10
mr x
Recipes 
 
May 2007
Mainly Halifax
Posts: 1,576
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts


In the December BYO Jamil has a recipe that calls for WLP013, Wyeast 1028, or Danstar Nottingham. IIRC, I have seen other recipes using 1028 that recommended Nottingham as well.


__________________
This place really went to hell. Follow the OF standard stout. Bye.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sub for Danstar Nottingham Yeast??? mangine77 Recipes/Ingredients 7 11-06-2008 09:31 PM
Danstar dry wheat yeast. FSR402 Recipes/Ingredients 1 05-01-2008 02:20 AM
Using London Ale Yeast, London Water Profile Necessary? killerhertz General Techniques 1 03-27-2008 10:49 PM
what do you think of Danstar Nottingham Yeast LS_Grimmy All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 36 03-26-2008 08:17 PM
danstar yeast question darkstar79 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 8 01-14-2008 12:19 AM


Forum Jump