Used whirlfloc with disasterous results. - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Beer Discussion > Used whirlfloc with disasterous results.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-23-2013, 04:50 AM   #1
looneybomber
Recipes 
 
Feb 2012
lawrence, ks
Posts: 599
Liked 25 Times on 20 Posts



So I tried whirlfloc for the first time tonight. I do partial mashes on the stove (BIAB). Tonight I used 8lbs of grain and 7lbs of DME. I mashed in kettle one (2.5gal) and sparged in kettle two (1.75gal). I combined and added water till I hit 3.75gal.

Normally, using that much grain means I get a lot of debris floating in the wort that takes FOREVER to settle out, so I tried whirlfloc to speed up the process.
Boil finished around 6:30'ish, I whirlpooled it, and put it in my 35deg container of water outside. Around 7 when it was cool enough, I brought it in and set it on the counter. I racked it to my fermenter around 9:30, giving it plenty of time to settle...just like I always do.

As I start racking, I keep the end up on the auto siphon near the surface of the wort, sucking bubbles every once in a while. Worts flowing nice and clear...for about 1 gallon. Nearly the next 3 gallons it looked like I was sucking chocolate milk (brewed a porter). Normally, with a lot of grain, I get that towards the last 1 gallon and feel bad for having to waste that gallon, but 3/4 of the wort was like that! I can't just dump everything down the drain and leave only about 1.5 gallons (once I add top-up water to lower the gravity) to ferment.

Any ideas what happened? I see so many rave reviews on whirlfloc and thus far this has been the dirtiest, nastiest wort ever. I've done batches with 14lbs of grain and 6oz of hops and it was very close to being as bad as this, but it was because I racked over too much hop material.
__________________
Queue: King Tut ale, BIG barleywine, Desire mead, .
Fermenting:Denny Conn's vanilla porter
Secondary:
Bottled: <1.060: AHS Aniv Wit, lemon wheat, Blonde rye.
<1.090: How Rye I Am, Rye wheat ale, spiced tripel, tripel w/orange, baltic porter, skeeter pee lime and lemon w/cranberry, Milk stout.
<1.110: Reverend clone, IIPA. Chocolate RIS, Bourbon Barrel Quad, chocolate RIS w/oak & whiskey
>1.110 OG: Double W (inspired) stout, Choco milk Czar, Mephistopheles (inspired) stout..

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 05:20 AM   #2
Doctor_M
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Doctor_M's Avatar
Recipes 
 
May 2012
Falls Church, VA
Posts: 863
Liked 110 Times on 83 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by looneybomber View Post
So I tried whirlfloc for the first time tonight. I do partial mashes on the stove (BIAB). Tonight I used 8lbs of grain and 7lbs of DME. I mashed in kettle one (2.5gal) and sparged in kettle two (1.75gal). I combined and added water till I hit 3.75gal.

Normally, using that much grain means I get a lot of debris floating in the wort that takes FOREVER to settle out, so I tried whirlfloc to speed up the process.
Boil finished around 6:30'ish, I whirlpooled it, and put it in my 35deg container of water outside. Around 7 when it was cool enough, I brought it in and set it on the counter. I racked it to my fermenter around 9:30, giving it plenty of time to settle...just like I always do.

As I start racking, I keep the end up on the auto siphon near the surface of the wort, sucking bubbles every once in a while. Worts flowing nice and clear...for about 1 gallon. Nearly the next 3 gallons it looked like I was sucking chocolate milk (brewed a porter). Normally, with a lot of grain, I get that towards the last 1 gallon and feel bad for having to waste that gallon, but 3/4 of the wort was like that! I can't just dump everything down the drain and leave only about 1.5 gallons (once I add top-up water to lower the gravity) to ferment.

Any ideas what happened? I see so many rave reviews on whirlfloc and thus far this has been the dirtiest, nastiest wort ever. I've done batches with 14lbs of grain and 6oz of hops and it was very close to being as bad as this, but it was because I racked over too much hop material.
Was it protein clumps? Like egg drop soup?http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f39/ques...diment-431257/

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 05:32 AM   #3
ResumeMan
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
ResumeMan's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2011
Oakland, CA
Posts: 482
Liked 28 Times on 27 Posts


I believe that the sludgy stuff you saw was cold break - exactly what whirlfloc is intended to generate. The way to go is to just dump that all into your fermenter, and it'll drop out at the end of fermentation, leaving that haze-inducing crap in with the trub.

It's a definite RDWHAHB situation. Wort is gross looking, fermenting beer is gross looking, clear, finished, carbed beer is wonderful
__________________
I am not drunk! I am by nature a loud, friendly, clumsy person!

LoloMT7 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 05:35 AM   #4
BigFloyd
 
BigFloyd's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2012
Tyler, Texas
Posts: 5,268
Liked 759 Times on 652 Posts


How much whirlfloc did you use and when did you add it?

How fine was your crush? If you happen to get a bunch of suspended grain flour in the boil, whirlfloc isn't going to help clear that out. The good news is that it will drop out during ferment. Cold crashing will help to firm up the trub layer and make it harder to suck out of the primary. My first batch on my E-BIAB rig was like this before I tweaked my processes on it. It looked like a bunch of tan mud going into the fermenter. After cold crash, it was very clear going into the bottling bucket. Tasted great too.
__________________
Good Temp Control -----> Happy Yeast ------> Tasty Brew

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 05:50 AM   #5
bzwyatt
Recipes 
 
Jun 2009
SoCal
Posts: 459
Liked 31 Times on 25 Posts


Yeah it isn't in the boil that wirlfloc is effective - it sets up the solids to drop in fermentation. The wort I use it in look way different than when I don't. Wait until it is done, you'll see.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 06:21 AM   #6
chri5
Member
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Oct 2008
Sacramento, CA
Posts: 362
Liked 17 Times on 16 Posts


That is totally normal.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 09:11 AM   #7
Schol-R-LEA
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Mar 2013
Athens, GA
Posts: 528
Liked 95 Times on 71 Posts


As has been said, this is the normal result of using whirlfloc (or Irish moss - Whirlfloc is just a compressed for of Irish moss, in fact), hence the name - it causes the cold break to flocculate into larger chunks, so it can fall out of suspension more readily. Once the cold break settles, the beer will be clearer than it would be otherwise.

Note that it is unusual to use it with a dark beer like a porter (though if it's meant to be a ruby porter I could see using it, I guess); the main goal is that it settles out the proteins than cause chill haze, which isn't an issue with darker beers as any haze won't be readily visible. Even if the beer isn't opaque (which porter shouldn't be), it would be dark enough to make chill haze a moot point, I would think. I would save the Whirlfloc for paler beers (Pilsners, Pale Ales, Tripels) rather than use it where the results won't be noticeable.
__________________
Rev. First Speaker Schol-R-LEA;2 LCF JAM ELF POEE GS MGT KoR KCO BiWM TGIF
#define KINSEY (rand() % 7)
λ
Boy Toy: You must think I'm a terrible human being...
Punchline: Don't be ridiculous. Nobody thinks you're a human being.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 09:24 AM   #8
emjay
 
emjay's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2011
Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 12,794
Liked 1719 Times on 1606 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Schol-R-LEA View Post
I would save the Whirlfloc for paler beers (Pilsners, Pale Ales, Tripels) rather than use it where the results won't be noticeable.
Why do you feel you need to "save" it at all? It's not in short supply, and the stuff is dirt cheap, so I find this kind of thinking rather baffling. There's no real reason you can't do both.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 09:27 AM   #9
Schol-R-LEA
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Mar 2013
Athens, GA
Posts: 528
Liked 95 Times on 71 Posts


True, but my point is that there's little reason to use it in darker beers.
__________________
Rev. First Speaker Schol-R-LEA;2 LCF JAM ELF POEE GS MGT KoR KCO BiWM TGIF
#define KINSEY (rand() % 7)
λ
Boy Toy: You must think I'm a terrible human being...
Punchline: Don't be ridiculous. Nobody thinks you're a human being.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 10:25 AM   #10
zacster
Recipes 
 
Jan 2008
Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,125
Liked 38 Times on 31 Posts


You will end up with clearer beer when you go to all grain and do a full boil. I use whirlfloc myself, but sometimes forget to put it in, and I always end up with clear beer now. There are things in extract that don't settle out, proteins I guess. And doing all grain BIAB needs a full boil just because you want to mash the grains that way. One or the other has made my beer clear. Or maybe there's a third thing I do, I bought a keg, and chilling the beer in the keg, and having it all settle out in one vessel, makes for a clear tap.

 
Reply With Quote


Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
whirlfloc nolabrew85 General Beer Discussion 20 02-09-2013 04:11 AM
bad results with malty beers, great results with hoppy beers liebertron General Beer Discussion 15 02-15-2012 06:03 PM
When to add Whirlfloc? Stratotankard General Techniques 3 08-02-2008 02:56 PM
Whirlfloc ??? fretman124 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 9 08-24-2007 10:49 PM
First time bottling, potentially disasterous Bobby_M Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 3 10-02-2006 05:48 PM


Forum Jump