Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Recipes/Ingredients > Smoked Malt Question
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-30-2013, 04:22 PM   #1
BertusBrew
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Roselle, IL
Posts: 162
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default Smoked Malt Question

I have a Scottish Ale recipe that I love. I want to brew it this time and add some smoked malt. Just enough to give a hint of smoke. Here is the grain bill. How much smoked malt should I use for a 5 gallon batch?

9lbs Maris Otter
9oz crystal 60
5oz amber
4oz roasted barley


BertusBrew is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 04:41 PM   #2
EBloom97
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 119
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts

Default

My first attempt at a Scottish ale I used 8 oz of peat smoked malt. Too much. Tasted like a campfire. I would go with 4 oz for something subtle.


EBloom97 is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 06:59 PM   #3
motorneuron
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 561
Liked 53 Times on 52 Posts
Likes Given: 26

Default

Big question is whether you want a SMOKE taste, or a PEAT taste.

I agree that peat-smoked malt is very potent--for me, so potent that I think I may never use it again, or at least only in very small quantities (an ounce or two). That is after I made a Scottish with 4 oz and found it almost undrinkable for months. And I love peated scotch, too.

Smoked malt, on the other hand, tends to be much more subtle. German rauchmaltz could be 10% of your grain bill and leave a more subtle effect. In smaller quantities, just a few ounces, say, it'd add just a whisper of smoke, which could be nice.

You can also consider adding liquid smoke when you bottle--that allows you to step up to the quantities you want.
motorneuron is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 07:29 PM   #4
BertusBrew
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Roselle, IL
Posts: 162
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorneuron View Post
Big question is whether you want a SMOKE taste, or a PEAT taste.

I agree that peat-smoked malt is very potent--for me, so potent that I think I may never use it again, or at least only in very small quantities (an ounce or two). That is after I made a Scottish with 4 oz and found it almost undrinkable for months. And I love peated scotch, too.

Smoked malt, on the other hand, tends to be much more subtle. German rauchmaltz could be 10% of your grain bill and leave a more subtle effect. In smaller quantities, just a few ounces, say, it'd add just a whisper of smoke, which could be nice.

You can also consider adding liquid smoke when you bottle--that allows you to step up to the quantities you want.
Probably going to use Breiss Smoked Malt, not Peated. Thanks, I think I'm going to add a few ounces and see what happens.
BertusBrew is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 04:12 PM   #5
ryan_george
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fergus, Ontario
Posts: 235
Liked 21 Times on 15 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

I use Weyermann Beach Smoked Malt and it is very mild. We use up to ~40-50% in our smoked amber ale, and it's not overpowering at all.
ryan_george is online now
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 05:37 PM   #6
DSmith
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Robbinsdale, MN
Posts: 793
Liked 72 Times on 60 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryan_george View Post
I use Weyermann Beach Smoked Malt and it is very mild. We use up to ~40-50% in our smoked amber ale, and it's not overpowering at all.
Agree that the Weyermann Beach Smoked Malt at 20% of the grainbill is a hint of smoke, 50-60% is nicely smokey but maybe 1/2 of the smoke flavor in an Aecht Schlenkerla Rauchbier Märzen.

Could you post your smoked amber recipe?
DSmith is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 05:44 PM   #7
Neopol
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Neopol's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Munster, IN
Posts: 736
Liked 65 Times on 54 Posts
Likes Given: 27

Default

Last smoked porter we did was a 12% Briess Cherry Smoked malt...

Girlfriend who smokes thought it was too smokey until it aged over a month.. I on the other hand (do not smoke) enjoyed it nice and prominent yet also agree that it conditioned out nicely...time to get another in rotation.
__________________
BREWMUTT

Don't you know there aint no devil...thats just god when hes drunk!
Neopol is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 05:49 PM   #8
kh54s10
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
kh54s10's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tiverton, Rhode Island
Posts: 8,435
Liked 970 Times on 815 Posts
Likes Given: 248

Default

I think the amount would depend largely on which smoked malt and how fresh it is. Aged malt would lose some of it's smokiness.

I brewed a smoked Ale based on John Palmer's Elevenses.
5.75 Maris Otter
1.0 Crystal 75
1.0 Oak Smoked Wheat Malt 10.9%
.75 Brown Malt
.33 Flaked Oats
.25 Chocolate malt
.10 Peat smoked malt. 1.1%

It was very noticeably smokey. Very good.
Peat Smoked malt is VERY potent. You need to use it VERY sparingly. I would not use more than .15 pounds of peat smoked. It would quickly overpower the flavor. You could go higher on the Oak Smoked Wheat.
kh54s10 is online now
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 02:08 AM   #9
SpeedYellow
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,343
Liked 147 Times on 125 Posts
Likes Given: 36

Default

It's really impossible to suggest an amount of smoked malt because it depends entirely on the freshness. I've used 20% Briess in a Helles and you could barely detect the smoke. And I've used 90% Weyermann smoked where you could barely detect smoke. All due to freshness I'm sure.
SpeedYellow is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 02:17 PM   #10
SpeedYellow
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,343
Liked 147 Times on 125 Posts
Likes Given: 36

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BertusBrew

Probably going to use Breiss Smoked Malt, not Peated. Thanks, I think I'm going to add a few ounces and see what happens.
You won't taste anything from a few ounces of Briess. A few pounds you may likely taste, but again depends on the freshness. The only consistent way to use smoked malt is to smoke it yourself unless you could get a manufacture date, which is probably hard to do.


SpeedYellow is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bottled and tasted my Blond (smoked malt question) ajm163 General Beer Discussion 3 08-27-2012 07:58 PM
Question about using SMOKED grains/malt. BigRob90 Recipes/Ingredients 8 02-28-2012 05:35 PM
Home smoked malt instead of rauch malt RedHouse Recipes/Ingredients 5 06-11-2011 03:49 PM
smoked malt vs peat-smoked malt JLem Recipes/Ingredients 6 05-18-2009 01:59 AM
Peat-smoked malt vs. Rauch Malt brewbies Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 12 03-11-2009 11:08 AM


Forum Jump

Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS