All Rye Porter/ Stout experiment- Thoughts/ assistance please - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Recipes/Ingredients > All Rye Porter/ Stout experiment- Thoughts/ assistance please
Cool Brewing Giveaway - Supporting Membership Drive & Discount

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-04-2013, 07:38 PM   #1
prohl84
Recipes 
 
Jan 2013
Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 326
Liked 42 Times on 33 Posts



So I really like rye beer and the lady of the house also likes anything with rye which is a bonus. I have only ever used 1.75# of rye in a beer before (my 'Soul Proprietor' which is the only recipe I have posted so far) I didn't use rice hulls and had no problems sparging. Based on my reading I have decided to use 1.5# rice hulls (1.75# may be ideal so I may grab more from LHBS) and to try a double infusion for the first time.

I had a coupon from midwest supplies so I ordered some of the specialty rye they carry (though in the future I will likely just roast my own from LHBS)

Going for a robust porter or dry stout; here is the recipe and method I have devised for 6.5 gal:

1.5# rice hulls 8.6%
13# rye malt 74.3%
2# crystal rye 11.4%
1# choc rye 5.7%

b-Glucanase rest: 110 F 14 qt. @ 122 F for 30 min. (.8 qt./ lb.)
Sacch rest: 156 F 18 qt. @ 205 F for 60 min. (1.77 qt./ lb.)
Batch sparge: 11 qt. @ 168 F for 20 min. and collect 8.3 gal

.50 oz nugget 60 min. (first wort)
.25 oz nugget 30 min.

S 05 yeast

.25 oz nugget. dry hop 14 days
bottle carb @ 2.5 vols

Any thoughts especially regarding my mash schedule?
I feel like 1.77 qt/ lb. is super thin for a mash but if I went any thicker I would need steam injection to raise to sacch temp. I could decoct but I don't want to do that since rye DP is only 75 Lintner and adding near boiling water won't be as detrimental to enzymes as actually boiling wort. I am mashing in a cooler so direct heat is out.

I plan on sparging very slowly maybe with 5 qt. for 20 min then begin runoff and then add other 6 qt. (total 11) as runoff continues. Or should I just add all 11 at once, wait 20, and runoff?



 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 03:21 AM   #2
CurtHagenlocher
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Mar 2012
Mercer Island, WA
Posts: 52
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts


My personal sense (as someone who likes rye) is that 100% rye isn't a good idea. Have you had a roggenbier or anything else in the 50-60% range? I would try something like that before going for this.



 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 04:15 AM   #3
Malticulous
Recipes 
 
Aug 2008
St. George Utah
Posts: 4,139
Liked 72 Times on 57 Posts


Very interesting but I would not do it. I'm interested in how it comes out.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 12:23 PM   #4
ardonthorn5
Recipes 
 
Sep 2011
clearfield, pa
Posts: 213
Liked 6 Times on 5 Posts


there was an episode of Basic Brewing where they did a 100 percent rye ... i remember it being described as viscous....

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 12:46 PM   #5
eulipion2
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
eulipion2's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2006
Hawley, PA
Posts: 1,644
Liked 81 Times on 62 Posts


I was considering doing the same thing, so if you do this, please report back! I haven't brewed with much rye so I really can't say how it'll turn out, but that's why we do what we do, right?
__________________

Primary: Norwegian Farmhouse Ale

Kegged: Bohemian Pilsner; Altbier; Vienna lager; Schwarzbier; Citra/Calipso IPL; Dry Stout

Bottled: Grodziskie; Sterling Patersbier (homegrown); Mosaic Session Brett; Saison Americain; Session Saison

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 12:48 PM   #6
TheZymurgist
Recipes 
 
Oct 2010
Georgia
Posts: 1,363
Liked 242 Times on 179 Posts


Yeah, that much rye will give you a very syrupy mouthfeel. You also should do a decoction mash, resting at 122, then boiling part of the grain to raise it to sacc rest. I just did a lot of research for a rye barleywine, and just brewed a roggenbier. The decoction helps keep the rye from turning to mush, which causes stuck sparges. Rice hulls will not be enough.

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f14/rogg...lanned-422025/

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f12/tryi...eywine-416171/

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f12/rye-...advice-416086/
__________________
"What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again, there is nothing new under the sun."

"... in the US, people need a style first and then a beer. I am still convinced that it's reverse; you enjoy a beer, not a style. An artist creates, a publisher copies. Brewers should be artists, but we are constantly bogged down in trying to diminish the art into a style." - Peter Bouckaert

Yet another minnow in the sea of beer blogs...

prohl84 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2013, 02:57 PM   #7
prohl84
Recipes 
 
Jan 2013
Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 326
Liked 42 Times on 33 Posts


Brewed yesterday... meanwhile the replies began.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CurtHagenlocher View Post
My personal sense (as someone who likes rye) is that 100% rye isn't a good idea. Have you had a roggenbier or anything else in the 50-60% range? I would try something like that before going for this.
Prudence is not my forte! Also I thought roggenbier was fermented with wheat yeasts (I am trying to like wit and weizen... I don't like banana runts)
I might like it if a "clean" strain were used similar to Lagunitas' little sumpin' sumpin' ale (lots of wheat; doesn't taste like a wheat beer)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ardonthorn5 View Post
... i remember it being described as viscous
the first runnings were one step below hot LME.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheZymurgist View Post
Yeah, that much rye will give you a very syrupy mouthfeel. You also should do a decoction mash, resting at 122, then boiling part of the grain to raise it to sacc rest. I just did a lot of research for a rye barleywine, and just brewed a roggenbier. The decoction helps keep the rye from turning to mush, which causes stuck sparges. Rice hulls will not be enough.
Is it really syrupy? My experience with rye is that it is very crisp and dry. I am not doubting you, I see by your threads you have made far more rye beer than I. I researched this a long while ago and had bookmarks but now that I read your posts I maybe would have changed my method a bit (Where were you two days ago!? ) I should have combed the forums better.

I employed a b-glucanase rest at 110F for 30min. the .77 qt./ lb. was just enough to wet the grains comfortably and it worked like a charm. B-glucan is the protein that makes wheat, rye, and oats sticky as hell. I haven't tried the rest @ 122 I thought that was primarily to reduce haze forming proteins but now I see that the rests sort of overlap.

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/wiki/ind...h_temperatures

I did not decoct because I didn't want to destroy my enzymes since rye DP is lower than barley. I use beersmith because I find the temperature/ volume calculations to be fairly accurate. I added strike water for sacch. rest and hit my temp dead on.

I batch sparged really, painfully slowly. I ended up using 2 batches of 11 qts. instead of one and I collected 8.3 gallons successfully. It only got stuck one time but a quick poke and stir of the mash paddle got her going again. (Does that sound dirty to anyone else?) I found intermittent stirring to be fairly necessary because the grain bed would become super compact. Also I sparged at 170, rested, and let it run- when it slowed to a trickle I did second batch at 180 to make sure it would run off thoroughly- which it did. If you are sparging through anything better than 14" of braided SS hose then you are better off than I am. If I did this again I would use the same qty. of rice hulls in the mash and then add another 1/2 lb. or so when sparging.

My post boil volume was high at 7 gal instead of 6.5 but the gravity was one point higher than estimated. Sweet, 80% efficiency and four extra pints! The brew gods must delight in my ambition.

So far this has been successful. I did another sparge and collected 3 gallons for a gruit- braggot experiment gravity was 1.028 so I will be adding lots of honey and perhaps some LME in a few days once fermentation has started.

I will continue to follow up with developments.
I suppose it's worth mentioning that the specialty rye malts smelled even more like coffee and chocolate in the boil than some of the dark malts. Mash smelled like I was baking pumpernickel.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2013, 03:28 PM   #8
Yooper
Ale's What Cures You!
HBT_ADMIN.png
 
Yooper's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2006
UP of Michigan, Winter Texan
Posts: 68,496
Liked 7361 Times on 5205 Posts


I had a beer once that whatsleftofyou made, and I think it was something like 70% rye. I could drink it, but that was about it.

I LOVE rye, but I find that the sweet spot for most beers with rye is about 30%. It has great flavor and richness, but not that intense spicy syrup flavor.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2013, 03:31 PM   #9
Yooper
Ale's What Cures You!
HBT_ADMIN.png
 
Yooper's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2006
UP of Michigan, Winter Texan
Posts: 68,496
Liked 7361 Times on 5205 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by prohl84 View Post
B



I did not decoct because I didn't want to destroy my enzymes since rye DP is lower than barley. I use beersmith because I find the temperature/ volume calculations to be fairly accurate. I added strike water for sacch. rest and hit my temp dead on.
You can still decoct, as you don't destroy the enzymes when you decoct. You hold at the conversion temperature before boiling, and then add that back to the mash. You pull mostly grain, not liquid, so you don't ruin the ability to convert. Still, I don't see an advantage to decoction here anyway so it's a moot point.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2013, 04:51 PM   #10
TheZymurgist
Recipes 
 
Oct 2010
Georgia
Posts: 1,363
Liked 242 Times on 179 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooper View Post
You can still decoct, as you don't destroy the enzymes when you decoct. You hold at the conversion temperature before boiling, and then add that back to the mash. You pull mostly grain, not liquid, so you don't ruin the ability to convert. Still, I don't see an advantage to decoction here anyway so it's a moot point.
My understanding was that the decoction helps prevent stuck sparges, but it's looking like that may be incorrect, or at least unnecessary. That's the whole reason I did it, but I didn't have anything to compare it to.


__________________
"What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again, there is nothing new under the sun."

"... in the US, people need a style first and then a beer. I am still convinced that it's reverse; you enjoy a beer, not a style. An artist creates, a publisher copies. Brewers should be artists, but we are constantly bogged down in trying to diminish the art into a style." - Peter Bouckaert

Yet another minnow in the sea of beer blogs...

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Recipe assistance - Spiced Oatmeal Stout? adagiogray Recipes/Ingredients 2 04-19-2012 03:56 AM
Thoughts on Next Beer (Prepacked kit versus recipe) chocolatey Stout/Porter Jamie8747 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 0 07-03-2010 07:12 PM
Neapolitan Stout (Recipe Assistance?) jalgayer Recipes/Ingredients 1 04-05-2010 07:09 PM
PM - Oatmeal Stout - assistance needed dblvsn Recipes/Ingredients 6 03-23-2007 02:43 PM


Forum Jump