2013 NHC first round results? - Page 43 - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Beer Discussion > 2013 NHC first round results?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-01-2013, 03:42 AM   #421

Quote:
Originally Posted by soonami View Post
I can't say I agree with all the comments, but maybe that's the benefit of going to Homebrew meetings and getting a lot of feedback from many people instead of just two
In general national judges know their stuff. Their email addresses should be on the scoresheets. Shoot them a note and say "Hey, thanks for your comments on my beer at the _________ NHC Regional; I'm sure you won't remember this particular beer but here's the feedback you gave me. (add whatever feedback you would like to focus on) Now, my beer has done rather well at other competitions, so I would like to try to reconcile what you told me with comments I have received elsewhere. Here are my thoughts on your comments. (now add whatever you would like to say) If, in light of what I've just said, you have any further comments or feedback on my process that might help me improve future entries, please let me know by return email. Thank you very much for taking the time to consider my request, and for your service to homebrewers everywhere via your role as a National Beer Judge. Sincerely, ________"
__________________
2012 Canadian Brewer of the Year
2013 Canadian Brewer of the Year
2015 Canadian Brewer of the Year

@evilgoatbrewing

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 03:59 AM   #422
BPhad
Recipes 
 
Feb 2012
Will County, Illinois
Posts: 241
Liked 10 Times on 7 Posts


Anyone from Milwaukee seen a place on a scoresheet yet?
Just wondering (hoping) maybe they left them off so we would have to wait until May 4th?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 04:20 AM   #423
soonami
Recipes 
 
Feb 2010
Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 75
Liked 9 Times on 7 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by osagedr View Post
In general national judges know their stuff. Their email addresses should be on the scoresheets. Shoot them a note and say "Hey, thanks for your comments on my beer at the _________ NHC Regional; I'm sure you won't remember this particular beer but here's the feedback you gave me. (add whatever feedback you would like to focus on) Now, my beer has done rather well at other competitions, so I would like to try to reconcile what you told me with comments I have received elsewhere. Here are my thoughts on your comments. (now add whatever you would like to say) If, in light of what I've just said, you have any further comments or feedback on my process that might help me improve future entries, please let me know by return email. Thank you very much for taking the time to consider my request, and for your service to homebrewers everywhere via your role as a National Beer Judge. Sincerely, ________"
That's very good advice and I think I'll take you up on it. Although I think if a judge is scoring a beer in the teens, he didn't like it all, which is not something you can have a discussion about in my mind. But I will send that message.

I think part of it might just be evolving tastes, I think East Coast brewers and drinkers just have a certain aesthetic when it comes to certain styles that may fall on one end of the style spectrum when compared to another region. For instance, Amber Ales that do well in comps here tend to be more balanced, maltier, sweeter, caramel versions of pale ale, where's in California, they almost want a red tinge DIPA. Makes me wonder how the NYC judges might have scored the same beers

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 02:03 PM   #424
HungusBrews
 
HungusBrews's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2008
Roxbury, New Jersey
Posts: 155
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts


Anyone get the mail yet today? I am hoping when I get home the NYC envelops are waiting.
__________________
BJCP Certified

Brewing Website/Blog:
HungusBrews

Appalachian Trail Hiking Blogs:
GA --> ME 2007
GA --> ME 2012

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 02:13 PM   #425
stevo155
Recipes 
 
Jun 2008
Derry, NH
Posts: 979
Liked 42 Times on 35 Posts


I can just imagine hundreds of homebrewers getting their envelope, like when Ralphie got his Little Orphan Annie decoder key and running into the bathroom for privacy while they check their scoresheets.
__________________
BN Army for Life!!!

Darwin18 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 02:16 PM   #426
Darwin18
 
Darwin18's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2008
Garner, NC
Posts: 5,339
Liked 952 Times on 668 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by soonami View Post
Really disappointment in some of the comments for my sour beers though. A national BJCP judge complained that my fruit beer (Passionfruit Berliner) was "heavily infected" and to "check sanitation procedures for fruit prep and bottling." It's a Berliner, it's going to be acidic, have no hops or malt and will be dominated by the base beer acidity! Also, the "acidic acid" you taste is from the fruit...
Did they explain any rationale behind the infection comments? A visible ring around the bottle or a gusher, or did they just say "acidic" as their main descriptor?

Quote:
Then there was the 17C entry (Syrah Lambic), one judge was at 35, and the other was at 19 before he bumped up his score to 23! The one that gave me a 19, was a National judge. His scoresheet was one of the most blank I've ever received and it complained 4 times about "bitterness": I used whole grapes with skin, those are grape tannins and oak tannins from the French oak chips! This beer has scored in the 38-42 range in a couple other comps, so I know it's good, but there is no way this is a 23 let alone 19 point beer!
That is a really large scoring difference between the two judges. Sixteen points is huge, and generally you want both judges to be within 2 - 3 final points of each other. Sounds like for whatever reason he just did not like the beer. It sounds like a really cool beer though. Like others have said, I would send him an email and ask him if he recalls why he felt strongly about it.
__________________
BJCP #F0684 - Certified

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 04:03 PM   #427
sweetcell
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
sweetcell's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2012
Rockville, MD
Posts: 5,144
Liked 980 Times on 709 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by soonami View Post
"check sanitation procedures"
maybe it's just me, but this piece of feedback isn't very helpful. they might as well tell me that i should "brew a better beer".
__________________
What hops should I grow? Looking for cheap honey?
- Drinking: BPA made with ingredients from NHC, 2 blends of a rye sour: ECY20 + ECY34, local sour cherry kriek #2, brett'ed Belgian blond on raspberries
- Aging: Imperial Chocolate Milk Stout (half on coconut), sour blond on second-use cherries, English Barleywine (half on brett), 3726 saison w/ brett x2 (dregs mix & Lochristi), GNO 3724 saison w/ brett mix, sour cherry mead, acerglyn, and a few other sours...

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 04:09 PM   #428
BrewKnurd
 
BrewKnurd's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2011
Prairieville, LA
Posts: 2,763
Liked 245 Times on 203 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetcell View Post
maybe it's just me, but this piece of feedback isn't very helpful. they might as well tell me that i should "brew a better beer".
I guess that depends on what you're doing with sanitation. If you can honestly say that you're doing everything you know to do to maintain ideal sanitation, then yes, just telling you to do it better doesn't help much. However, speaking for myself, I have plastic that's been around for a while. There are things that I do that I probably could do better. So I know that there are things that I could do to be more sanitary. So if I started seeing that comment with any frequency, it would let me know that its time to revisit those things.
__________________
Fake it til you make it.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 04:15 PM   #429
weirdboy
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
May 2009
Los Angeles
Posts: 8,216
Liked 492 Times on 397 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetcell View Post
maybe it's just me, but this piece of feedback isn't very helpful. they might as well tell me that i should "brew a better beer".
OK, smartypants. Let's hear your better feedback for an infected beer. "Check sanitation" seems pretty appropriate to me. Without delving into process specifics for that brewer, which nobody has during a competition because everyone is just drinking from a bottle with a number on it, I personally cannot think of better advice to write down in that situation.



However, for sours in particular I agree that saying the beer is infected isn't particularly useful unless you couch it very specifically. E.g. is it acetic, solventy, etc. Every sour is infected and the important part is determining whether the infection is appropriate to style. The more specifically you can describe the aroma and flavor of the beer, the better chance of identifying the flaws. All that said, in terms of feedback there is nothing better to write, IMO, than "check sanitation procedures" for beers which are obviously infected with bad stuff. It may be obvious to most, but that doesn't make it incorrect.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 04:16 PM   #430
soonami
Recipes 
 
Feb 2010
Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 75
Liked 9 Times on 7 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwin18 View Post
Did they explain any rationale behind the infection comments? A visible ring around the bottle or a gusher, or did they just say "acidic" as their main descriptor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetcell View Post
maybe it's just me, but this piece of feedback isn't very helpful. they might as well tell me that i should "brew a better beer".
The thing is, it was a sour beer! But I still treat it like I treat my clean beers albeit with a different set of plastic. Clean beers have no problem with sanitation. The judges did mention that the beer was cloudy, thin, and gushed a bit. I think it was because it's a no boil Berliner, so it never gets very clear in my experience even with a protein rest and cold conditioning. Since I added pasteurized passionfruit pulp, that isn't the source of contamination (if there is any) although it might have contributed to the cloudiness and the fruit fibers might have contributed nucleation points for the beer to gush since it was carbonated to 3.5 volumes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrewKnurd View Post
I guess that depends on what you're doing with sanitation. If you can honestly say that you're doing everything you know to do to maintain ideal sanitation, then yes, just telling you to do it better doesn't help much. However, speaking for myself, I have plastic that's been around for a while. There are things that I do that I probably could do better. So I know that there are things that I could do to be more sanitary. So if I started seeing that comment with any frequency, it would let me know that its time to revisit those things.
I have a different set of plastic (autosiphon, tubes, bottling bucket, wands, airlocks, stoppers, Better Bottles, etc) for sour beers. I mark everything that touchs bugs with red marker so I know not to mix it into use with clean beers. I've never had any clean beers get score sheets that said it was contaminated. Only this Berliner...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwin18 View Post
That is a really large scoring difference between the two judges. Sixteen points is huge, and generally you want both judges to be within 2 - 3 final points of each other. Sounds like for whatever reason he just did not like the beer. It sounds like a really cool beer though. Like others have said, I would send him an email and ask him if he recalls why he felt strongly about it.
That struck me as very strange, even the 12 point difference that they settled at seemed very far apart. I think that judge just plain didn't like it

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2013's How many gal of homebrew in 2013 miker1529 General Beer Discussion 5157 11-10-2014 10:37 PM
2013 Big Tap-in Bruwsomtin Want to Buy 1 03-18-2013 02:11 PM
bad results with malty beers, great results with hoppy beers liebertron General Beer Discussion 15 02-15-2012 06:03 PM
The NHC First Round Results have been posted! Catt22 General Beer Discussion 17 05-11-2009 08:18 PM
Watching the hops go round and round..... andylegate General Techniques 2 11-20-2006 01:33 PM


Forum Jump