Belgian Golden with FG of 1.000 - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > Belgian Golden with FG of 1.000

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-07-2013, 05:21 AM   #1
patjofo
 
patjofo's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2013
Posts: 59
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts



I brewed a Belgian Golden Ale from a Brewers Best extract kit. It sat in a primary for 7 weeks. Bottled it and measured a FG of 1.000, even with temp correction. Tasted great. Is a FG of 1.000 possible?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 05:32 AM   #2
urbanmyth
Recipes 
 
Nov 2011
Twin Lakes, WI
Posts: 1,001
Liked 60 Times on 48 Posts


Yes.
__________________
Aurė Entuluva! Day shall come again!

Sheldon: If its a brew day, its a good day

raptorvan: it makes the beer so silky smooth its like drinking a glass of giggling angels.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 06:16 AM   #3
Cyclman
I Sell Koalas
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Cyclman's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2013
Aurora, CO
Posts: 6,197
Liked 740 Times on 616 Posts


Would be exceptionally dry. Unlikely it actually has no residual sugar, yeasts don't typically attenuate 100%. More likely not perfect measurement equipment.
__________________
Give a man a beer, waste an hour. Teach a man to brew, and waste a lifetime! Bill Owen quote

Why does Happy Hour limit happiness to 1/24 of the day?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 11:50 AM   #4
Ogri
 
Ogri's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2011
Osaka, Japan
Posts: 830
Liked 76 Times on 71 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by patjofo View Post
I brewed a Belgian Golden Ale from a Brewers Best extract kit. It sat in a primary for 7 weeks. Bottled it and measured a FG of 1.000, even with temp correction. Tasted great. Is a FG of 1.000 possible?
Alcohol is lighter than water so if the ABV is high enough it is, technically, possible to get a reading of 1.000 and still have some residual sugar in the beer.

Aren't BSGAs supposed to finish really low anyway,
like somewhere around 1.004 to 1.006?
__________________
Very often you can't see the important things on the outside........................................... .
.............Like takoyaki.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 12:04 PM   #5
Ryush806
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Ryush806's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2010
Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 784
Liked 92 Times on 64 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by patjofo
I brewed a Belgian Golden Ale from a Brewers Best extract kit. It sat in a primary for 7 weeks. Bottled it and measured a FG of 1.000, even with temp correction. Tasted great. Is a FG of 1.000 possible?
Yup it's possible. But if it tastes great who cares?
__________________
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
- Benjamin Franklin (and I don't care if this quote has been largely discredited/misquoted...I like it!)

Beer, if drank with moderation, softens the temper, cheers the spirit and promotes health.
- Thomas Jefferson

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 01:12 PM   #6
scottab
 
scottab's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2011
hawthorne, nj
Posts: 343
Liked 15 Times on 14 Posts


I am about to bottle the same beer, brewers best belgian golden ale. I topped off with slightly too much water and my sg was slightly low but when i did my final readings last week i found it was 1.004 thought i was reading wrong but since i read the sample 3 times and all the same i went with it. I then dumped gelatin into my fermenter and it's been sitting for a week and looks super clear. Can't wait till it primes to taste.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 03:06 AM   #7
ASM
Recipes 
 
Jun 2013
Posts: 3


I just did the Brewer's Best Belgian IPA and had similar results. SG was 1.050 and FG after 1 week in primary was 1.004. Airlock activity was strong and steady for about 5 days and the last two slowed down very much but I still saw a few bubbles. Tasted it and it does have a very dry, alcohol taste, but I did not detect any other off flavors. I know I accidentally put in too much yeast nutrient (about 2x). Otherwise, no deviations. Not a hydrometer problem. I racked to secondary, dry hopped and I'm hoping for the best.

How did your ale turn out? I'm curious to know if this will condition OK or continue to burn towards alcoholic water.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 12:25 AM   #8
scottab
 
scottab's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2011
hawthorne, nj
Posts: 343
Liked 15 Times on 14 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by ASM View Post
I just did the Brewer's Best Belgian IPA and had similar results. SG was 1.050 and FG after 1 week in primary was 1.004. Airlock activity was strong and steady for about 5 days and the last two slowed down very much but I still saw a few bubbles. Tasted it and it does have a very dry, alcohol taste, but I did not detect any other off flavors. I know I accidentally put in too much yeast nutrient (about 2x). Otherwise, no deviations. Not a hydrometer problem. I racked to secondary, dry hopped and I'm hoping for the best.

How did your ale turn out? I'm curious to know if this will condition OK or continue to burn towards alcoholic water.
It turned out very tasty, no hot alcohol flavors at all. I think it would have been slightly better with a tiny bit more residual sugar but overall it was on the money for flavor.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 01:36 AM   #9
RealLyte
Recipes 
 
Jun 2013
Posts: 8

My bga from brewers best also ended at 1.000. I was worried until I tasted it. Great flavor and no overpowering alcohol flavor for being ~9.3%.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Belgian Golden Ale Gear101 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 23 02-05-2012 05:05 PM
First AG Belgian Golden Ale spui All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 3 01-05-2012 01:18 PM
Belgian golden ale around 6.5%? Brooklyn-Brewtality Recipes/Ingredients 6 01-30-2010 05:03 AM
Belgian Golden Ale [email protected] Recipes/Ingredients 4 05-28-2008 02:53 AM
Belgian Golden not so Golden moritz Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 7 07-27-2006 12:18 AM


Forum Jump