Why not FWH on every APA and IPA - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Techniques > Why not FWH on every APA and IPA
Cool Brewing Corny 5G & Mini Giveaway

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-02-2013, 10:42 PM   #1
greatschmaltez
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 304
Liked 18 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 1


I've read a lot on this technique and am trying to come up with a scenario that I would not want to eliminate a 60 (or 90) minute hop bitterness addition and instead get my bittering IBUs from FWH additions. Everything I've read, this type of addition give more flavor and aroma (along with the appropriate bitterness) than bittering additions at the beginning of the boil. Any good counter points?



 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 10:48 PM   #2
ILoveBeer2
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 108
Liked 13 Times on 12 Posts
Likes Given: 5


I FWH everything and have not found a reason not to.



 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 11:17 PM   #3
mooshimanx
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: san diego, california
Posts: 215
Liked 20 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 6


Quote:
Originally Posted by greatschmaltez View Post
I've read a lot on this technique and am trying to come up with a scenario that I would not want to eliminate a 60 (or 90) minute hop bitterness addition and instead get my bittering IBUs from FWH additions. Everything I've read, this type of addition give more flavor and aroma (along with the appropriate bitterness) than bittering additions at the beginning of the boil. Any good counter points?
Sometimes I actually want a more biting bitterness addition. You also usually will have to hop burst to get to the bitterness level you want in an IPA (very large FWH additions start to become astringent) which can use a ton of hops and not necessarily increase the perceived hoppiness multiplicatively by the amount of hops you actually used.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 11:30 PM   #4
UnDeadPresident
Junior Member
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
UnDeadPresident's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 150
Liked 21 Times on 13 Posts
Likes Given: 17


From what I hear it eliminates the more harsh tones of the bitterness, so if that's a component of a good I/APA for you, then you may want to avoid the method. If you like your bitterness to be more smooth, FWH may be the way to go.
__________________
Primary
California Pale Ale
Bottled
Rye IPA, Citra Pale Ale, ESB, CO Pale/Simcoe SMaSH

"Give me a woman who truly loves beer, and I will conquer the world."
- Wilhelm II of Germany

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 11:59 PM   #5
bmick
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 324
Liked 26 Times on 16 Posts
Likes Given: 2


I like to use a high-alpha hop that's know for it's smooth bitterness (Warrior/Galena/Super Galena) as a FWH for the bittering backbone in all my IPAs. Other than that everything is added from 15 mins on. Works great and all the beers done this way have done very well in comps.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 01:43 AM   #6
MidTNJasonF
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Smyrna, Tennessee
Posts: 449
Liked 69 Times on 49 Posts
Likes Given: 9


I FWH every APA or IPA I make and have been doing so for a couple of years now. Heck I have even first wort hopped a couple stouts and porters.
__________________
Will ride for beer!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 02:27 AM   #7
greatschmaltez
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 304
Liked 18 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 1


Cool, the general consensus of this thread is kind of where I was at for these two styles. Other styles where hop flavor/aroma isn't as desirable, I can see going regular bitterness additions, but ipa/apa, this seems the way to go with the precautions mentioned.

Galena is my preferred FWH as well.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 02:40 AM   #8
billl
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,182
Liked 347 Times on 290 Posts
Likes Given: 7


Well, the obvious counterpoint is that pretty much every commercial IPA you probably love does not FWH. That doesn't mean it isn't a valid technique, but obviously people are making top notch IPA using standard bittering additions.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 03:18 AM   #9
Krovitz
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Quincy, MA
Posts: 580
Liked 123 Times on 74 Posts
Likes Given: 64


I heard Stone FWH a number of their beers.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 03:19 AM   #10
theveganbrewer
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,918
Liked 295 Times on 209 Posts
Likes Given: 265


Quote:
Originally Posted by billl View Post
Well, the obvious counterpoint is that pretty much every commercial IPA you probably love does not FWH. That doesn't mean it isn't a valid technique, but obviously people are making top notch IPA using standard bittering additions.
There are quite a lot of commercial breweries making top beers in their styles using FWH.


__________________
-Retired Homebrewer

 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools



Forum Jump