Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Recipes/Ingredients > Wyeast Thames Valley Ale Yeast Lag Time
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-25-2013, 07:12 PM   #1
SeanGC
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Staten Island, NEW YORK
Posts: 250
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default Wyeast Thames Valley Ale Yeast Lag Time

Hello all,

I've used this yeast strand once before. And, like many of you, I experienced a minerally/swampy flavor intially. However, once the yeast dropped out completely, I was left with a very clear, bright, and clean tasting beer.

With that said, I noticed that the lag time was pretty long the first go around, and I am experiencing a lag time of +24 hours in the EPA I just brewed.

I know a lag time of 24+ isn't uncommon, I just wanted to see if anyone else had the same experience with the yeast, so I know for sure it's a characteristic of the strand.

Pitching notes:

Pitched at 62, 2000ml starter, 10 gals of wort, 1.061 Wort OG, 1.050 starter.
__________________
President
Pour Standards, Richmond County Brew Society
SeanGC is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2013, 07:13 PM   #2
bferullo
Senior Member
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
bferullo's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 490
Liked 21 Times on 18 Posts
Likes Given: 11

Default

I use it in some of my english bitters. I have noticed the lag time also. Didn't seem to affect the final product though.

also, I don't make starters....before people start commenting on starters and lag time.
bferullo is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2013, 07:16 PM   #3
SeanGC
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Staten Island, NEW YORK
Posts: 250
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Yea, I make the same generic starter for all of my beer, since I brew 10-12 gals at a time. I rather make a 2L starter than purchase two smack packs.

Never had a stuck fermentation, and rarely do I experience a lag time of 24+ hours. This strand has been one of the few exceptions. However, I loved the product the first time around (Same EPA recipe), and I'm expecting similar experiences the second time around.
__________________
President
Pour Standards, Richmond County Brew Society
SeanGC is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2013, 09:29 PM   #4
PseudoChef
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
PseudoChef's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Chicago 'Burbs, IL
Posts: 3,424
Liked 104 Times on 76 Posts
Likes Given: 39

Default

A 2000 ml starter is underpitching for 10 gallons of 1.061 wort to be fermented at 62 degrees (and that's assuming 100% viability, which probably isn't the case). Your starter gravity is also high and could be causing cell wall stress. Try to be around 1.036-1.040 in the future.

Lag time is rarely a function of the yeast strain - it is more a function of the yeast health and cell count.
PseudoChef is offline
Stauffbier Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2013, 11:48 PM   #5
SeanGC
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Staten Island, NEW YORK
Posts: 250
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

That's definitely a possibility, one I considered. However, like I mentioned earlier, I pitch 2L starters to 10 gals of 1.050-1.060 regularly, and I've never had an issue.

I also use a stir plate, which yields more cells than a standard starter.
__________________
President
Pour Standards, Richmond County Brew Society
SeanGC is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2013, 01:07 AM   #6
PseudoChef
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
PseudoChef's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Chicago 'Burbs, IL
Posts: 3,424
Liked 104 Times on 76 Posts
Likes Given: 39

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanGC View Post
That's definitely a possibility, one I considered. However, like I mentioned earlier, I pitch 2L starters to 10 gals of 1.050-1.060 regularly, and I've never had an issue.

I also use a stir plate, which yields more cells than a standard starter.
Doesn't mean you're still not underpitching. You also never mentioned how old the yeast was/is.

Take a look at a yeast pitch rate calculator. I like Kai's because you can change the pitch rate - when fermenting cooler like you are, I like bumping it up to 1 million cells/ml wort/degree Plato.

http://www.brewersfriend.com/yeast-p...er-calculator/
PseudoChef is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 09:33 PM   #7
SeanGC
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Staten Island, NEW YORK
Posts: 250
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

I prefer Kai's as well. According to the calculations on yeastcalc.com, our starter should have hit its pitching rate. However, I like the calculator you provided. It's an easier read than yeastcalc.com. Thank you.

Also, as a quick update. The beer started fermenting roughly 30 hrs after we pitched. We pitched at 62, but stepped it up to 65, and has been fermenting steadily for the past 5 days.
__________________
President
Pour Standards, Richmond County Brew Society
SeanGC is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wyeast Thames Valley Ale Yeast #1275 Yooper Recipes/Ingredients 12 11-10-2011 02:17 AM
Yeast for Special Bitter: S-04 vs. Wyeast 1275 Thames Valley gregdech Recipes/Ingredients 4 06-09-2011 07:27 PM
Wyeast Thames Valley Ale 1275 USM_Eagle Recipes/Ingredients 7 04-03-2011 05:27 PM
Anyone used Wyeast 1275 Thames Valley Ale? FlyGuy Recipes/Ingredients 5 08-15-2007 11:40 AM
Wyeast 1275 Thames Valley mysterio Recipes/Ingredients 2 01-27-2007 06:12 PM


Forum Jump

Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS