Ss Brewtech’s Biggest Baddest Holiday Giveaway Ever!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Techniques > extract boil times!
Thread Tools
Old 09-28-2007, 06:29 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
NateKerx's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 169
Default extract boil times!

I was reading this article by a certain Robert Hansen in the the October issue of Brew magazine, and he states unequivocally that "Award-winning brewers typically boil their extract for 45 minutes". John Palmer seems to be telling this Hansen guy to relax, "The extra boiling time won't hurt."

I've heard bits and pieces of discussions about this before, and while I understand the need for proper aeration after longer boils specifically, is there really any reason why "Award-winning brewers typically boil their extract for 45 minutes"?? isnt it better to make sure you get the hop utilization as calculated? Its not as though you're boiling for a half hour after your aroma hop additions and destroying all the good stuff... a bit confused

What do the extract/partial mash brewers use for boil times??

Primary:Zach and Jack's African Amber, Lil Sparky's Nut Brown
On Tap: Fire In the Hole Red Ale, Sixpoint Righteous Ale
On Deck:Centennial Blonde, Amarillo Cream Ale

"Drinking is the joy of the Russes, we cannot live without this pleasure."

-Vladimir I, Grand Prince of Kiev
NateKerx is offline
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 06:40 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
mrkristofo's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Behind the zion curtain
Posts: 916
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts


I always use between 60 and 90 mins for extract or minimash.

Here's what the CRC Guide to Brewing Science and Practice has to say about it:

The changes that occur during boiling include the dispersion of the hop resins and oil,
the isomerization of some of the alpha-acids, the conversion of dimethyl sulphide precursor
(SMM; DMSP; 4.157) to DMS (4.158), the formation of new flavour and aroma
compounds, (largely through Maillard reactions, which also give rise to coloured
compounds and so a darkening of the wort), the denaturation and inactivation of residual
enzymes carried forward from the mash and the denaturation and coagulation of the
proteins that, combined with polyphenols, form the trub (which may weigh 20±70 g dry
wt./hl Chapter 9). The more vigorous and prolonged the boil the more complete the
removal of coagulable proteins and the more resistant the beer to the formation of non-
biological haze, but it will have less good foaming properties. The inactivation of the
enzymes stabilizes the composition of the wort in one sense, but of course the high
temperature maintains the on-going chemical reactions. The wort needs to be sufficiently
agitated to cause the denatured proteins to coagulate and form flocks. This process may
be assisted by the addition of copper finings, mainly the negatively charged, sulphated
polysaccharide -carrageenan, `Irish moss', added at 4±8 g/hl (Chapter 9). Instead some
breweries use silica gel.
Question answered?

Coming Soon:
Primary: Stone Vertical Epic 08.08.08
Secondary: Oaked Arrogant Bastard
Conditioning: Dead Guy Ale clone, Double-Dubbel
Drinking: Not for a while
mrkristofo is offline
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 12:21 PM   #3
Ale's What Cures You!
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Yooper's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UP of Michigan
Posts: 66,918
Liked 6654 Times on 4741 Posts
Likes Given: 1856


When I did extract, I did 60 minute boils. However, I found that the extract was carmelizing a bit, so I started adding the majority of the extract with 15 minutes left in the boil. This increased the hops utilization, so the first time my beer was about twice as bitter as I expected. When I bought software, I ran the numbers and it was true- my IBUs went from like 25 to 48. After that, I just adjusted my bittering hops and kept doing the late extract addition.

So, my boil was 60 minutes for the hops, but my extract was in there around 15 minutes. The extract has already been boiled by the manufacturer so you don't need to worry about it, the way you would if you were mashing. The chemical changes in the extract have already happened.
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

Follow me on facebook:
But I'm pretty boring so don't expect much!
Yooper is offline
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 12:57 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
TheJadedDog's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: People's Republic of Cambridge
Posts: 3,309
Liked 16 Times on 13 Posts


I tend to boil for 75 minutes or so as I wait for the hot break before adding my hops (I find that reduces the chances for boil-over). I have never had any attenuation or carmelization issues due to the longer boil time.
And now we go AG!

On Tap: Nadda
Primary: Nadda
Planning: Extra Special Bitter
TheJadedDog is offline
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 02:39 PM   #5
Here's Lookin' Atcha!
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
TexLaw's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,684
Liked 27 Times on 26 Posts


Originally Posted by TheJadedDog
I tend to boil for 75 minutes or so as I wait for the hot break before adding my hops (I find that reduces the chances for boil-over). I have never had any attenuation or carmelization issues due to the longer boil time.
I do the same for ales. I usually make it 90 minutes for lagers. As I also increase boil volume and, thereby, wort dilution to account for the longer boil, I've seen no difference in carmelization. Attenuation is just the same, too. Basically, the only effect I've seen is a more stable beer.

Head retention isn't an issue, since I use Foam Control. If anything, my head retention is too good, and it may take me a while to pour that first beer. I do like that dense, rocky head, though. That goes double for my lagers.

TexLaw is offline
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 04:39 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
malkore's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 6,922
Liked 34 Times on 32 Posts
Likes Given: 9


Well, you're comparing two peoples opinions. expert opinions, but still just opinions, not scientific facts that show 45 minute boils make better or worse beers than 60 minute boils.

beers are judged using opinions based on factual guidelines, so that makes 3 sets of educated opinions on the matter...still no real facts.

Not trying to belittle your question, just explaining how it might be a futile debate where there's no right or wrong answers.
(kinda like hot side aeration)
Primary: English Mild
On tap: Pale Ale, Lancelot's Wheat, English Brown Ale, Steam Beer, HoovNuts IPA
Bottled: MOAM, Braggot, Raspberry Melomel, Merlot, Apfelwein, Pyment, Sweet mead, Cabernet
Gal in 2009: 27, Gal in 2010: 34, Gal in 2011: 13, Gal in 2012: 10
malkore is offline
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 10:59 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
homebrewer_99's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atkinson (near the Quad Cities), IL
Posts: 17,785
Liked 120 Times on 94 Posts
Likes Given: 1


Boil times only really relate to the amount of AA% hop bitterness extraction.

HB Bill
homebrewer_99 is offline
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Extract Boil Times blisterman Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 16 04-04-2010 12:03 AM
Hops & Boil Times Jknapp All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 4 08-28-2009 11:56 PM
Boil times for Lambic Jsta Porter Lambic & Wild Brewing 7 02-11-2009 04:53 AM
What determines Boil Times? redneckbeagle All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 6 05-14-2008 08:23 PM
Reason for different boil times, all grain vs. extract? Thor General Techniques 5 12-18-2005 09:26 PM

Forum Jump

Newest Threads