Coldbreak Brewing Giveaway - Winners Drawn!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Consistently low efficiency - what's my problem?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-26-2013, 11:49 PM   #1
musikguru6
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 110
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default Consistently low efficiency - what's my problem?

Hey all -

Moved to all grain recently, and after two batches I'm getting really low efficiency (around 60% or less).

Setup:
10 gallon cooler system, false bottom for the mash tun, fly sparge w/ a rotating sparge arm.

Other notes:
I've used a PH balancer with both batches. My first batch, I was a few degrees off on my saccharification rest, but this most recent one I hit perfectly.

Grain is purchased pre-milled from Austin Homebrew Supply.

So - what am I doing wrong? I'm on track for another batch next weekend, and would like this one to be better. Thanks for the help!


musikguru6 is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 12:24 AM   #2
MBTB
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 79
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts

Default

What's your batch size?

How many pounds of grain?

What's the mash water to grain ratio?

How many quarts of water for the sparge?

You could try mashing with 1.25 qts. per lb. of grain and sparging with 2 qts. per lb. of grain. This gives me 80% eff. every time

Better luck next time. Enjoy!


MBTB is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 12:42 AM   #3
musikguru6
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 110
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Shoot for about 7 gallons in the pot before boil. Most recent recipe had 17lbs of grain, one before that had 12.5.

Most recent batch had 22.25 quarts for the mash. Sparged till I hit my boil volume (made sure I wasn't going under 1.010).

One before that used 16.62 quarts of water for the match. Again sparged till I hit my boil volume.
musikguru6 is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 01:56 AM   #4
Denny
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eugene OR
Posts: 4,380
Liked 467 Times on 348 Posts
Likes Given: 583

Default

99% of the time, poor crush is the culprit behind low efficiency.
__________________
Life begins at 60....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

http://www.experimentalbrew.com - the website for the book "Experimental Homebrewing"...coming Nov. 2014
Denny is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 02:55 AM   #5
brewmax25
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: , Idaho
Posts: 123
Liked 7 Times on 6 Posts

Default

You're mash was pretty thin. Around 1.3 quarts per pound and I have the same set up as you. I shoot for around 1-1.1 quarts per pound. Thicker mash allows for better enzyme action. Also, unless you are hitting you're mash temp right on with a thinner mash, you may not be getting good enzyme action.
__________________
Primary: empty
Secondary: Bourbon Porter, Belgian Sour Brown, Brett Belgian Quad, Berliner Weisse
Kegged : Fresh Hopped Rye, Fresh Hopped Belgian Pale Ale
On Deck : Finishing the Brew Stand!
brewmax25 is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 02:57 AM   #6
Denny
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eugene OR
Posts: 4,380
Liked 467 Times on 348 Posts
Likes Given: 583

Default

I dunno....I usually use 1.65qt./lb. and average 85% . My efficiency actually went up a few points from a thinner mash.
__________________
Life begins at 60....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

http://www.experimentalbrew.com - the website for the book "Experimental Homebrewing"...coming Nov. 2014
Denny is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 04:20 AM   #7
musikguru6
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 110
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brewmax25 View Post
You're mash was pretty thin. Around 1.3 quarts per pound and I have the same set up as you. I shoot for around 1-1.1 quarts per pound. Thicker mash allows for better enzyme action. Also, unless you are hitting you're mash temp right on with a thinner mash, you may not be getting good enzyme action.
I generally go by the water guidelines given by beersmith. Should I not be following those? Or am I missing a setting somewhere to adjust this?
musikguru6 is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 04:25 AM   #8
Denny
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eugene OR
Posts: 4,380
Liked 467 Times on 348 Posts
Likes Given: 583

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by musikguru6 View Post
I generally go by the water guidelines given by beersmith. Should I not be following those? Or am I missing a setting somewhere to adjust this?
Beersmith is a tool to help you brew the way you want to brew. It is NOT instructions on how to brew. You get to decide that for yourself.
__________________
Life begins at 60....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

http://www.experimentalbrew.com - the website for the book "Experimental Homebrewing"...coming Nov. 2014
Denny is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 04:57 AM   #9
musikguru6
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 110
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Denny View Post
Beersmith is a tool to help you brew the way you want to brew. It is NOT instructions on how to brew. You get to decide that for yourself.
So, do I need to adjust the amount of water that I'm using in my mash - ignore beersmith and calculate my own, or is it more likely to be an issue with the crush?
musikguru6 is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 02:52 PM   #10
MBTB
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 79
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts

Default

I agree with Denny. Beersmith is only a tool. Your supplier has an excellent reputation and is probably providing a good crush. So many Homebrewers complaining about poor efficiency are using Beersmith before they develop a technique. (I'm NOT trying to badmouth Beersmith. It is a good tool.) I would work on your mashing and sparging practices to achieve your goals and then incorporate Beersmith.


MBTB is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Consistently (really) low efficiency, here's my notes. mother_night All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 43 03-25-2012 08:22 PM
Possible Efficiency Problem? klamz General Techniques 6 10-19-2011 11:56 PM
An Efficiency Problem the_mox Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 7 10-11-2011 04:48 PM
Consistently Poor Efficiency SeanS86 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 14 05-06-2011 04:29 AM
Efficiency problem? MikeScott All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 3 10-20-2009 03:31 AM


Forum Jump

Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS