Dry yeast? - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > Dry yeast?

Thread Tools
Old 01-25-2013, 10:41 PM   #1
Jan 2013
Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3

Hello all,

I'm getting back into homebrewing after an extended (~10 year) hiatus. In my previous brewing experience, I basically would have never considered using a dry yeast - I think the shift I made after about 5 batches of beer from dry to liquid when I began brewing back in the mid-90s was the single biggest improvement in my beers - much bigger than the difference between extract and all-grain. In looking through several forums now however, I see quite a few folks using dry yeast. My question is have dry yeasts really improved that much?

Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:45 PM   #2
DirtyOldDuck's Avatar
Jan 2012
Portland, Oregon
Posts: 548
Liked 70 Times on 61 Posts

I wasn't brewing 10 years ago , but there are a few very good dry yeasts, at least in my opinion. I like Nottingham and S-05. I use both liquid and dry and have had very good luck with both of these dry yeasts.

Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 11:03 PM   #3
cluckk's Avatar
Apr 2005
San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,599
Liked 361 Times on 230 Posts

I know ten years ago (I was brewing then) the big problem with dry yeast was the process gave more chance for the culture to get infected before packaging, so you had a greater chance of a bad fermentation. I've never used dry yeast, except for the first batch that the dry yeast came with the extract kit. The first change I discovered and started doing was using liquid yeasts. There was much more variety. I'm not sure of their quality today because I haven't even owned a pack of dry yeast since then.
"So you say you just brewed your first batch of beer. Welcome to the obsession." --me, to every first time brewer I ever meet.

Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 11:10 PM   #4
KeystoneHomebrew's Avatar
Dec 2012
Montgomeryville, PA
Posts: 351
Liked 34 Times on 31 Posts

Dry yeast has come a long way my friend! I remember those days too. I mainly use liquid yeast myself, but switch to dry when doing some big beers and lagers for cost reasons should I not feel like making a starter.

The variety is good, around 20 strains or so. Still not up to the variety of liquid, but most of the popular liquid strains are in dry too. Fear not the dry. Quality wise, it is on the same level as liquid these days, with better shelf stability than liquid to boot!
Got a Question? Always happy to help. Just shoot me a message.

Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 11:15 PM   #5
EdMerican's Avatar
Nov 2010
St Louis, MO
Posts: 369
Liked 54 Times on 34 Posts

I use exclusively dry yeast and I challenge anyone to tell me my beers are inferior to theirs using liquid. I like fermentis stuff, though I have used nottingham with great result also. I primarily use S04 and S05, but their wheat and belgian yeasts make damn fine brew. I can't find anything wrong with the lager strains either. The w34/70 is a tank and makes a great cal common as well as more traditional lagers, and a pretty good baltic porter too.

Personally I prefer the simplicity of use and storage. I keep a few packs of 4, 5 and 34/70 on hand at all times as I keep stock in ingredients and occasionally have the impromptu brew day. Much easier in my opinion to have a couple house strains when there are less options. If you can control your temp, you can control your yeast and get more characteristic variance from less strains. Cheers
E2 Brewing CoOp Est. 2010

"Hell, If it don't turn out good we'll just distill it and get drunk!" - My dad...

Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 11:17 PM   #6

I have absolutely no issues with using dry yeast. I can brew a helluva lot of styles with S-04, US-05, S-23 and W-34/70.
2012 Canadian Brewer of the Year
2013 Canadian Brewer of the Year
2015 Canadian Brewer of the Year


Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 11:22 PM   #7
Jun 2009
Canton, MI
Posts: 987
Liked 41 Times on 27 Posts

I started brewing 13 years ago and back then I used to use only liquid yeast. Back then there were no good dry yeasts. Today I can use 1 pack of US-o5 and it gets going faster then 2 viles of liquid yeast used to back 13 years ago.
Not all dry yeast is better today, but from my own experience: US-05 (it used to be S-56 back in the days), Nottingham and S-04 are as good if not better then their liquid counterparts nowadays.
"My Brew Day" on YouTube.

Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 11:26 PM   #8
Pilgarlic's Avatar
Feb 2010
Tampa Bay, Florida
Posts: 1,330
Liked 138 Times on 109 Posts

US-05 and T-58. I use them both a lot, both cover a lot of territory and I get few complaints. I'll complicate my process only if it gets me better beer. Using a liquid yeast in lieu of one of these doesn't usually fill that bill.

Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 11:41 PM   #9
Jan 2011
oakland, california
Posts: 3,294
Liked 161 Times on 151 Posts

i can get fresh yeast slurry from my local brewery (Drake's) anytime but i use dry yeast 95% of the time. won 2nd place for an APA in the world beer cup last yr with US-05.

Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 11:56 PM   #10
Jan 2013
Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3

Wow - I confess, I'm still something of a Doubting Thomas, but I may have to split out some of my next brew and try one of the drys you folks are recommending!

Reply With Quote
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Beer Yeast Cake, Which Bottles Have Culturable Cider Yeast Ulixes Cider Forum 1 04-20-2012 09:00 PM
Creating cider yeast from wine yeast or capturing wild orchard yeast, thoughts???? Daze Cider Forum 4 01-01-2012 03:15 AM
Queston about adding yeast nutrient, enegrgizer, yeast slurry newbrew77 Winemaking Forum 0 04-18-2011 08:57 PM
Making a yeast starter from washed yeast. What are some physical signs of success? msa8967 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 8 03-16-2011 11:19 AM
Made two batches, one with huge yeast slurry, and one with dry Safale-04 yeast. Jolly McStanson General Beer Discussion 4 03-07-2009 08:23 PM

Forum Jump