Raw wheat, flaked wheat, malted wheat in lambics - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Lambic & Wild Brewing > Raw wheat, flaked wheat, malted wheat in lambics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-22-2013, 03:28 AM   #1
ChrisfromAbby
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Jan 2013
Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 141
Liked 6 Times on 4 Posts



I am contemplating a lambic and am pouring over what information I can find, without spending $85+ on the out of print Guinard book.

It seems the classical way to brew is the raw wheat in a turbid mash process, and that's how I am leaning to brew mine. It doesn't seem as complex now - after a few readings. Plus, I am already used to performing multi-rest infusions.

However, I have seen some recipes that call for simplified mashing and I wonder what differences could be expected? Some call for simple malted wheat, and others for flaked wheat. The malted seems straight forward,and the flaked wheat - well the starches are already gelatinized, so no overly complex rest schedule needed. I am trying to understand what the contribution of these variations on the wheat starches to the wort is?

I gather the turbid mash produces a huge variety of carbohydrates to feed the bugs over a very extended fermentation process. The malted wheat would provide a much more rapid (and traditional) brewing process - maybe where you were avoiding using the wild bugs, maybe? The flaked wheat appaealed to me for a while, but I figured that really,it wasn't significantly differerent from the malted wheat following a proper mash. But then it occurred to me - what really is the resulting difference?

I've never done a side-by-side comparison of even malted vs flaked wheat in a brew. If you can get the same results, why use raw wheat? I can see how it might be cheaper IN BULK. It was hard to find a supplier of raw wheat, and I think the flaked wheat was still cheaper....

Chris

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 03:33 AM   #2
lumpher
Recipes 
 
Jul 2009
texas
Posts: 5,070
Liked 267 Times on 228 Posts


first question: what do you plan to do: a full mash, partial, or steeping for extract? the type of wheat does matter depending on what mashing you're doing
__________________
There is no "i" in denial.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 05:00 PM   #3
ChrisfromAbby
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Jan 2013
Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 141
Liked 6 Times on 4 Posts


Planning on a full mash, probably mixed infusion and decoction-like turbid mash (using only the liquid not the grains) using raw wheat. But I am just curious about the effect of using malted or flaked on the final result, as obviously they would involve a less complicated mashing process. Would there be a loss of character in the beer - or does the very long fermentation eat up everything and leave it at the same end point?

Chris

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 12:23 PM   #4
TNGabe
Recipes 
 
Aug 2012
Posts: 6,655
Liked 2284 Times on 1539 Posts


FYI the out of print Lambic book isn't great. Found it for 6$ at a used book store and sold it on amazon after I read it.

There is a newer Lambic book around 50$ that's supposed to be much better.
__________________
The only thing worse than dumping beer is serving beer you should have dumped.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 02:20 AM   #5
gamb0056
Recipes 
 
Feb 2012
St. Paul, MN
Posts: 36
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts


I wondered about this myself as I planned my first lambic brewday. I used wheat malt with the main single infusion mash and did a separate cereal mash for the flaked wheat and added it to the main mash just before sparge. My assumption was that some of the late addition starches would be broken down to dextrins and simpler sugars, but many would be left behind for the bugs

edit: no results yet, I'm only 6 months in

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 06:33 PM   #6
Boegman
Recipes 
 
Jan 2013
Kingston/Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 17

I'm curious about this as well. I couldn't source raw wheat, so am planning on the following grain bill for a lambic:

4.5 lbs pilsner malt
3.5 lbs wheat malt
2 lbs flaked wheat

Will age 1-2 years then blend with a new brew to carb. It there any advantage to a turbid mash without the raw wheat? Or should I just infusion mash?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 03:39 PM   #7
suprchunk
Fich Eine Ente
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
suprchunk's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2010
Crestview, Florida
Posts: 776
Liked 19 Times on 17 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by TNGabe View Post
FYI the out of print Lambic book isn't great. Found it for 6$ at a used book store and sold it on amazon after I read it.

There is a newer Lambic book around 50$ that's supposed to be much better.
For the process the Guinard book really cannot be beat (however this site has pretty much the boiled down version). The newer lambic book is primarily about the history of each blender and brewer of lambics. And is an excellent book in that regard. Unless you are talking about something other than Geuze and Kriek.
__________________
[807.2, 191.8] Apparent Rennerian

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 01:53 AM   #8
ChugachBrewing
Recipes 
 
Mar 2008
Portland, Maine
Posts: 532
Liked 170 Times on 87 Posts


I have both of those books. Geuze and Kriek is more of a picture book (great photos, like gueze porn) describing processes and breweries, just snagged it on Amazon for $35. The price fluctuates daily.
The Guinard book is great. Also, there are some articles in Brewing Techniques that are great as well.
__________________
Check out my new blog brouwerijchuchach for information on fermenting beer, baking bread, pizza, and other experiments.

Don't like ads on the net? Make sure you have Adblock!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 03:22 PM   #9
Boegman
Recipes 
 
Jan 2013
Kingston/Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 17

I know this isn't the right thread, but people are posting here ... I brewed a lambic yesterday, followed the Wyeast turbid mash schedule in Wild Brews and pitched 2 smack packs of Wyeast Lambic blend into 5 gal wort at 1.048 and 69F. The yeast was manufactured 24SEPT12 (relatively old stock from my LHBS). The smack packs didn't swell much after 12 hrs and there is NO activity in my carboy after 12 hrs. Should I keep waiting or pitch some SF-US05 to get things going?

Reason: typo

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2013, 02:35 AM   #10
ChrisfromAbby
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Jan 2013
Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 141
Liked 6 Times on 4 Posts


I don't think you need the turbos mash unless you are using unmalted wheat.

I'm still sitting on my Brux. smack packs, and no actual experience as yet... But, have a Lindeman's Kriek I cultured the dregs from and it took almost 2 weeks to begin to work. I believe I've heard that Brettomyces cultures are slow to grow. Could that be it?

Also old, or previously frozen smack packs can definitely be slow.

Chris

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Malted Wheat vs. Flaked Wheat in a Hefe? ColoradoXJ13 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 10 05-20-2013 07:52 PM
Wit with both flaked and malted wheat, no go? tegeberg All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 5 03-05-2012 02:08 AM
Doh! I used flaked wheat instead of malted wheat... Newton All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 3 04-11-2010 02:33 PM
Malted Wheat or Flaked Wheat? BeerBalls Recipes/Ingredients 2 03-11-2010 05:52 AM
Malted Wheat vs. Flaked Wheat in a Wit? FlyGuy All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 2 06-27-2007 07:04 PM


Forum Jump